Hack review log.

Recent review activity

• Explain What You Just Learned in Your Own Words2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Publish as a distinct learning protocol because no self-explanation surface exists in the current canonical index, the 2025 meta-analysis directly supports the mechanism in digital learning environments, and the protocol can preserve moderation and scope instead of presenting self-explanation as universally optimal.
• Ask a Few Questions Before You Start Learning2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Publish as a new learning protocol because the current Growth Library has no prequestion/pretesting surface, the meta-analytic signal is directly actionable, and the target-versus-nontarget boundary can be preserved without inventing a dose.
• Ask AI for Failure Cases Before You Ship2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Publish as an AI-assisted QA ideation protocol with an explicit hypothesis-to-test boundary and no claim that model-generated cases are complete or correct.
• Benchmark AI on the Task Before You Trust the Workflow2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Make the jagged-frontier result executable as a low-risk workflow evaluation protocol rather than a generic claim about AI productivity.
• Extract a Table with AI, Then Sample-Check the Rows2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — A practical extraction workflow with traceability, explicit missingness, and consequence-weighted verification instead of unsupported claims about model accuracy.
• Summarize with AI, Then Reconcile Against the Source2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Publish as a source-reconciliation workflow. The protocol makes no universal summarization-quality claim and treats independent verification as the control against persuasive but incorrect output.
• Turn Real Examples into a Draft SOP with AI2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — A practical knowledge-capture workflow where generated documentation is validated against real operator behavior and a fresh case before adoption.
• Give AI a Rubric and Ask for Specific Critique2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — A bounded feedback workflow that keeps criteria and acceptance with the user; no unsupported claim that AI critique is universally superior to human review.
• Draft Professional Writing with AI, Then Take Back the Edit2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Publish as a bounded AI writing workflow: evidence supports task-level productivity gains in a specific professional-writing experiment, while the protocol keeps factual verification and final accountability human.
• Turn Meeting Notes into Actions, Then Reconcile Them2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — A low-risk transformation workflow with explicit privacy and reconciliation gates; no unsupported claim that AI meeting notes improve team performance.
• Attempt First, Use AI for Feedback, Retest Without It2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Turn mixed education evidence into a conservative human-first protocol that preserves the learner's target cognitive operation and requires an unaided retest.
• Use AI to Widen the Idea Set Before You Choose2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Publish as a bounded divergence protocol: empirical evidence supports creativity gains in specific ideation tasks, while selection remains tied to the user's real constraints.
• Use AI to Widen the Option Set, Not Make the Decision2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Publish AI as an option-expansion and challenge mechanism with explicit high-stakes exclusions and independent verification, not as a decision authority.
• Let AI Draft Routine Replies, Keep the Human on the Conversation2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Translate strong workplace evidence into a bounded human-in-the-loop reply workflow without extending the causal claim beyond the studied customer-support setting.
• Rehearse a Difficult Conversation with AI Before the Real One2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Publish as low-risk communication rehearsal with explicit privacy and non-prediction boundaries; not presented as therapy or as evidence about another person's intentions.
• Use AI to Scaffold Code, Then Make Tests Decide2026-09-15 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Keep the productivity signal narrow and pair it with ordinary software QA so generated code is treated as an implementation candidate, not a correctness proof.
• Whenever Stress Hits, Take a Quick 10-Minute Walk—whether It’s Outside, Around a Park, or2026-09-13 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Strengthen the existing conservative stress-walk protocol with a full-source-reviewed 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and crossover-randomized trials of green exercise. The new evidence supports treating a safe green route as an optional modifier for short-term wellbeing and affect, while preserving the existing boundaries: ten minutes is not an evidence-defined dose, a forest is not required, effects are not guaranteed, and the review does not establish a unique biological mechanism or long-term treatment effect.
• Make Goal Progress Visible Instead of Guessing2026-09-11 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Translate experimental meta-analytic evidence on progress monitoring into a minimal decision-oriented feedback loop while explicitly rejecting universal daily tracking and metric maximalism.
• Pair a Useful Task with Something You Genuinely Want2026-09-11 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Use two field experiments, including a large preregistered exercise program, to publish a bounded habit-starting protocol. The page keeps the strongest evidence tied to exercise, teaches compatibility and safety, and makes effect decay and routine disruption explicit.
• Pause Long Enough to Notice a Good Moment2026-09-11 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Translate a fully reviewed 2026 RCT-only savoring meta-analysis into a minimal nonclinical practice. The article explicitly separates the supported savoring construct from Brali's concrete implementation and avoids forced-positivity, dosage, long-term, and treatment claims.
• Leave a Ready-to-Resume Note Before You Switch Tasks2026-09-11 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Publish the strongest new productivity mechanism from the 2026-09-11 deep run as a bounded interruption-recovery protocol, preserving the study's actual scope and avoiding invented timing or performance claims.
• Walk Soon After a Meal When You Would Otherwise Sit2026-09-11 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Create a conservative movement protocol from a fully reviewed preregistered systematic review and meta-analysis. The page preserves the acute postprandial-glucose finding while explicitly excluding universal dose, exact timing, long-term prevention, disease-treatment, and medication claims.
• Turn a Good Intention into an If-Then Plan2026-09-11 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported effect-size claims, fabricated outcomes and observations, health-adjacent triggers, wearable thresholds, and rigid repetition schedules with a bounded cue-action decision rule for ordinary work.
• Tightly Squeeze Each Muscle Group for Five Seconds, Then Relax It for Thirty Seconds,2026-09-11 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Refresh the existing reviewed progressive muscle relaxation protocol with a 2026 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials focused on subjective sleep quality. The new synthesis supports PMR as a plausible low-cost sleep-support practice in the studied clinical populations, but high heterogeneity, possible publication bias, subjective outcomes, heterogeneous protocols and the absence of healthy-general-population trials in the review make a universal sleep claim inappropriate. The public protocol therefore keeps the conservative NHS technique, adds a sleep-specific use case and observation loop, and explicitly rejects magic session counts, mechanistic certainty and the claim that older adults do not benefit.
• Make Your Phone Less Visually Tempting with Grayscale2026-09-11 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Create a narrow Digital Attention protocol from a fully reviewed 2026 cross-over feasibility trial. The public protocol keeps the demonstrated endpoint—smartphone screen time—and explicitly excludes unsupported productivity, sleep, mental-health, long-term, and universal-effect claims.
• Turn One Routine Exchange into a Genuine Micro-Conversation2026-09-11 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Translate a fully reviewed randomized field experiment into a small context-sensitive relationship protocol. The public page preserves consent/context cues and limits claims to immediate social-affective outcomes rather than loneliness, social-anxiety treatment, or universal stranger interaction.
• Check Email in Deliberate Windows Instead of Continuously2026-09-11 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Create a bounded work-system protocol from the full experimental report. The public page keeps the direct causal endpoint—lower stress under less frequent email checking—and treats schedule design, urgent-channel separation, and operational fit as implementation choices rather than evidence-based universal doses.
• Before You Commit to a Judgment, Consider the Opposite2026-09-11 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Combine a fully reviewed classic consider-the-opposite experiment with a 2025 randomized-trial meta-analysis to create a narrow decision check. The article explicitly rejects universal debiasing, automatic reversal of first judgments, and strong real-world transfer claims.
• Batch Non-Urgent Notifications Instead of Receiving Them All Day2026-09-11 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Turn a reviewed randomized field experiment into a mechanism-first Digital Attention protocol: preserve urgent channels, batch non-urgent alerts predictably, and explicitly avoid treating the study's three-times-daily schedule or broad self-reported outcomes as universal prescriptions.
• Run a Weekly Review That Produces One Clear Change2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated adherence and execution results, unsupported optimal review windows, pseudo-precise weekly time leverage, health and nutrition examples, and arbitrary metric targets with a bounded operational weekly review.
• Choose Up to Three Priority Outcomes for the Day2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated completion samples, unsupported habit-decay and estimation claims, universal time budgets, morning-work prescriptions, and invented first-party observations with a capacity-based daily prioritization checklist.
• Structure Dense Writing for Fast Navigation2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated usability observations, unsupported comprehension gains, support-ticket claims, and arbitrary visual thresholds with a bounded document-structure review protocol.
• Evaluate Options Against Fixed Criteria Before Comparing Them2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported cognitive-bias mechanisms, fabricated team experiments, invented satisfaction and speed effects, arbitrary universal timeboxes and score scales, and high-stakes insurance or job-offer prescriptions with a criteria-stability decision workflow.
• Write a QA Report Another Person Can Act On2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated engineering-org results, unsupported cycle-time reductions, pseudo-optimal evidence quantities, invented social effects, and over-specific universal QA prescriptions with a practical defect-reporting template.
• Build a QA Checklist from Real Failure Modes2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated release observations, unsupported defect-rate claims, rigid checklist-size rules, and invented benchmarks with a bounded QA execution protocol.
• Use Elimination Rules to Narrow a Decision2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated decision-time and satisfaction statistics, invented first-party observations, arbitrary universal numeric thresholds, and pseudo-optimized probe rules with a bounded elimination workflow for low-stakes decisions.
• Match Demanding Work to Your Own High-Energy Windows2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported chronobiology effect sizes, fabricated productivity observations, caffeine and nutrition prescriptions, health-adjacent advice, and rigid timing claims with a self-observation and scheduling experiment.
• Create a Clear Handoff Between Two Activities2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace physics analogies presented as behavioral mechanisms, fabricated field trials and self-report effects, health-adjacent breathing and mobility prescriptions, arbitrary optimized durations, and unsupported psychological claims with a practical context-handoff checklist.
• Use One Random Constraint to Break a Creative Stalemate2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated internal pilots, completion-rate and idea-count effects, pseudo-optimal deck sizes and timers, and overclaimed creativity mechanisms with a simple reversible prompt-constraint exercise.
• Review a Decision Using What Was Known at the Time2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported debiasing effects, invented timing and memory thresholds, fabricated first-party process results, arbitrary scoring systems, and therapy-adjacent framing with a bounded retrospective decision review.
• Audit Workspace Friction Before Buying More Gear2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported productivity and discomfort outcomes, pseudo-medical posture rules, rigid dimensions and timing prescriptions, and fabricated observations with a bounded workspace-friction audit.
• Audit a Default Before Letting It Decide for You2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported uptake effects, invented attention savings and annualized impact, fabricated personal observations, arbitrary audit cadences, and overgeneralized privacy or security conclusions with a bounded default-choice review.
• Review Open Tasks and Leave With a Clear Next Action2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated user cohorts and retention results, unsupported time-savings, arbitrary review durations and archival thresholds, and pseudo-optimized task counts with a bounded task-list maintenance workflow.
• Use One Constraint to Produce a Different Creative Draft2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported creativity mechanisms, fabricated output comparisons and observations, physiological engagement claims, pseudo-optimal session lengths, and arbitrary completion targets with a reversible constraint-based drafting exercise.
• Turn an AI Reflection into One Next Action2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace obsolete Coot.AI branding, fabricated completion-rate observations, pseudo-optimized session lengths, mental-health-adjacent language, and unsupported follow-through claims with a vendor-neutral AI reflection and decision protocol.
• Use a Short Story to Explain One Point in Conversation2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported recall and credibility effects, fabricated training outcomes, pseudo-optimal story lengths and beat timing, and overgeneralized listener-state prescriptions with a concise relevance-and-privacy storytelling workflow.
• Separate Controllable Actions From Dependencies and Outcomes2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace therapy and physiological framing, medical and family-health examples, fabricated completion outcomes, fixed concern counts, timing prescriptions and attention claims with a bounded action-allocation workflow.
• Rehearse One Real Language Scenario2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported language-learning effects, fabricated classroom and pilot outcomes, rigid phrase counts and repetition schedules, anxiety claims and unsafe pharmacy examples with a bounded scenario-rehearsal workflow.
• Write a Context Brief Before Drafting2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated editing and publication outcomes, invented user tests, fixed word-count menus, pseudo-precise timing and unsupported audience-response claims with a bounded pre-draft context brief.
• Check the Operating Context Before Reusing a Decision2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated project outcomes, psychological mechanism claims, universal timing and sample rules, health and emotional examples and assumptions about other people's motives with a bounded operating-context check.
• Compare a Condition With the Same Condition Plus Another Requirement2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated pause experiments, cognitive-mechanism claims, arbitrary probability bins, daily quotas and inappropriate high-stakes examples with the underlying logical subset check.
• Run One Disconfirming Check Before a Consequential Commitment2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported historical and cognitive claims, fabricated volunteer and cohort outcomes, fixed habit targets, emotional mechanisms, high-stakes examples and arbitrary numerical thresholds with a narrow decision-preflight check.
• Record What Would Change Your Confidence Before You Commit2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated calibration statistics, effect claims, fixed probability increments, action thresholds, reminder schedules and first-party examples with a qualitative judgment-and-feedback loop.
• Batch Routine Messages Around Real Response Obligations2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported context-switching statistics, invented time-savings, rigid universal message schedules, fabricated observations, and pseudo-optimized block lengths with a role-aware communication batching workflow.
• Trace Repeated Claims Back to Their Underlying Sources2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported claims about repetition, judgment improvement and training targets, fabricated tracing outcomes, rigid timing rules and high-stakes examples with a bounded source-lineage procedure.
• Stress-Test a Belief With Strong Counter-Information2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported named-study and forecasting claims, fabricated bias effects, health examples, numeric source scoring, fixed search durations and equal-weight both-sides framing with a bounded claim-update workflow.
• Check a Streak Before Treating It as a Pattern2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated time savings and internal experiments, arbitrary sample cutoffs, probability thresholds, fold-change rules and financial action bands with a bounded denominator-and-context check.
• Connect a General Point to a Concrete Example2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported cognitive and rhetoric authority, fabricated recall and throughput effects, invented internal examples and rigid abstract-to-concrete ratios and timing prescriptions with a bounded message-editing move.
• Organize Complex Information Around One Decision2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported working-memory and comprehension claims, fabricated internal outcomes, universal chunk counts, fixed timing and word limits and pseudo-precise audience or template multipliers with a bounded information-structure workflow.
• Choose Resources for the Next Concrete Step2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated internal project outcomes, universal freshness windows, arbitrary time and price thresholds and claimed follow-through improvements with a bounded resource-selection and evaluation workflow.
• Taste and Adjust One Variable at a Time2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated kitchen outcomes, pseudo-precise seasoning formulas, unsupported physiological claims, and unsafe overgeneralization of tasting with a conservative feedback workflow.
• Check a Relevant Baseline Before Interpreting One Case2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported accuracy claims, fabricated outcomes, arbitrary sample-size confidence rules and medical, political, hiring and relationship prescriptions with a bounded reference-class and applicability workflow.
• Separate Observed Facts From Assumed Intent2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated conflict outcomes, unsupported neurological mechanism claims, arbitrary evidence-count thresholds, fixed response delays and overbroad high-stakes scripts with a bounded fact-versus-inference check.
• Calibrate Task Estimates With Planned vs Actual Work2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported planning-fallacy authority language, universal milestone sizes, fixed correction percentages, invented quick-task timing rules and claimed calibration gains with a bounded planned-versus-actual feedback loop.
• Use a Short Bullet Outline Before You Speak2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated clarity and meeting outcomes, unsupported working-memory explanations, invented client observations and rigid prescriptions for bullet counts, word counts, rehearsal doses and speaking rhythm with a bounded speaking-outline workflow.
• Build a Support Map Around Specific Needs2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated response rates and observational samples, rigid network-size targets, broad psychological claims, and pseudo-optimized social scripts with a consent- and boundary-aware support mapping protocol.
• Check Whether Familiarity Is Driving a Low-Stakes Choice2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated prototype outcomes, invented satisfaction changes, mechanism claims, arbitrary experiment counts and universal statements about cues or habit formation with a bounded low-stakes choice check.
• Decompose a Hard Problem with TRIZ-Inspired Contradictions2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace pseudo-quantified TRIZ outcomes, fabricated pilots, arbitrary timing rules, and broad superiority claims with a bounded problem-structuring exercise inspired by contradiction and separation.
• Turn a Large Goal into the Next Verifiable Step2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported completion-rate claims, fabricated experiments, arbitrary duration rules, and broad motivational promises with a concrete decomposition protocol.
• Keep a Work Wins Log You Can Reuse2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated pilot outcomes, unsupported confidence and motivation claims, invented adherence figures, arbitrary logging targets and pseudo-precise review schedules with a bounded work-record workflow.
• Batch Similar Tasks When Switching Is the Problem2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported productivity percentages, invented switching costs, rigid batch durations, and fabricated observations with a reversible workflow exercise.
• Run a Missing-Evidence Check Before a Decision2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated colleague and user results, unsupported uncertainty and risk-reduction percentages, guarantee-like language, and arbitrary thresholds with a bounded missing-evidence checklist.
• Automate a Routine Report with Validation and Fallback2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated team savings, unsupported reliability targets, arbitrary engineering thresholds, and broad automation claims with a bounded report-automation readiness and control protocol.
• Run a Detail Check Before You Ship2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported perception statistics, fabricated improvement timelines, invented pilot outcomes, and people-observation prompts with a bounded artifact verification routine.
• Use 80/20 as a Prioritization Hypothesis2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace an inherited Pareto article containing pseudo-precise effect sizes, arbitrary work intervals, fabricated observations, and ROI-style claims with a bounded prioritization exercise.
• Use AIDA as a Message Clarity Checklist2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported response-rate improvements, fabricated A/B outcomes, and formula-like persuasion claims with a bounded editing checklist.
• Run a Six-Perspective Thinking Pass2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported effectiveness claims, invented team observations, fabricated timing and conversion examples, and arbitrary experiment thresholds with a neutral six-perspective facilitation checklist.
• Build an AI-Assisted Question Bank You Can Verify2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported learning-effect percentages, rigid question ratios, fixed timing prescriptions, and research-sounding claims with a source-checked question-authoring workflow.
• Write an Affirmation You Can Actually Act On2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace therapy-adjacent framing, unsupported behavioral outcomes, fabricated first-party observations, rigid repetition schedules, and selectively presented literature claims with a bounded statement-to-action exercise.
• Test a New Work Tool on a Low-Risk Task2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated pilots, unsupported adoption metrics, medical-adjacent examples, and arbitrary success thresholds with a low-risk tool-evaluation protocol.
• Use a Brief Summary to Check What You Heard2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace unsupported empathy and speed effects, fabricated interpersonal observations, prescriptive eye-contact and nodding percentages, physiological instructions, and culture-insensitive nonverbal rules with an accessible comprehension-check protocol.
• Use a Short Pause Before an Ordinary Decision2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated pilots, unsupported physiological and decision-quality claims, prescriptive breathing mechanics, and arbitrary frequency and duration rules with an optional decision pause.
• Use a Stretch-Goal Sprint to Expose What Must Change2026-09-10 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated output and completion statistics, invented internal observations, arbitrary effort prescriptions, and projection-like 10x claims with a bounded stretch-goal experiment.
• Perform a Hiit Session with 20 Seconds of Intense Exercise (like Sprinting or Jumping2026-09-09 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Update the reviewed short-HIIT page with 2026 exercise-snack evidence. The strongest fresh synthesis is an RCT-only systematic review/meta-analysis of 21 studies (921 adults) showing moderate-certainty improvements in VO2max and peak power, while body-composition and blood-lipid findings remain low-certainty or inconclusive. A 2026 real-world randomized trial in 69 insufficiently active adults with type 2 diabetes provides an important boundary: four 1-minute vigorous bouts on at least five days per week were feasible, but did not outperform an active mobility/stretching comparator on most secondary cardiometabolic or fitness outcomes. The page therefore distinguishes a short interval session from exercise snacks spread through the day, keeps safety boundaries, and rejects one magic timer or cadence as an optimized prescription.
• Turn a Screen-Free Meeting Into a Walking Meeting2026-09-08 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace an inherited walking-meeting article containing unsupported cognition percentages, step and heart-rate estimates, wind and battery pseudo-precision, and overbroad cardiometabolic claims. Two full-text 2026 systematic reviews/meta-analyses support a narrower claim: in acute controlled settings, interrupting prolonged sitting with physical activity, especially walking or light-to-moderate movement, improves postprandial glucose and insulin outcomes. The evidence does not test walking meetings as a format, establish a universal timer, or show long-term disease prevention.
• Move Caffeine Earlier When Sleep Matters2026-09-06 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace a rigid, unsupported after-lunch/1 p.m. rule and inherited dosing advice with a bounded protocol based on a fully reviewed 2025 randomized crossover trial. The trial directly tests caffeine dose and timing relative to bedtime. It supports a stronger caution around a single 400 mg dose and shows why dose matters, while its small all-male sample and acute capsule design do not justify universal personal cutoffs or claims that 100 mg four hours before bed is harmless for everyone.
• Active Recall: Close the Notes and Make Memory Work2026-09-05 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Retain the bounded retrieval-practice evidence while rewriting the reviewed protocol in your tracker's explanatory voice. The page now teaches the difference between familiarity, retrieval, and application; removes inherited unsupported precision; and uses dry humor only to challenge learning theatre, not the reader. A 2021 systematic review supports retrieval practice for classroom learning/retention; two 2026 sources narrow interpretation by distinguishing direct and forward testing effects and showing that improved rule retention did not automatically produce better rule application in one classroom study.
• Try a Short Breath Meditation — Without Turning Five Minutes Into a Religion2026-09-05 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Keep the conservative short breath-meditation protocol while replacing brochure-like copy with Brali's teaching voice. NHS guidance supports a simple beginner practice with no universal session length and warns that mindfulness is not helpful for everyone. A 2026 preregistered network meta-analysis of 183 RCTs and 22,811 adults without diagnosed conditions adds a useful boundary: mindfulness is one evidence-informed route to general well-being alongside exercise, yoga, compassion and positive-psychology approaches, with no clear reason to present one as the universal winner. The page therefore teaches the attention-return loop, treats five minutes as a convenience rather than a dose, and normalizes switching practices when the method is unhelpful.
• Try Quiet Wakeful Rest After Learning2026-08-28 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Keep the conservative post-learning wakeful-rest protocol grounded in a 2026 meta-analysis of 142 effect sizes from 51 experimental studies, while adding a 2026 randomized classroom challenge study of 161 university students. The newer study found no consistent wakeful-rest advantage for factual recall or conceptual understanding of a complex expository text, so the public protocol is explicitly restricted to an optional declarative-memory experiment and must not claim better comprehension or general learning performance.
• Separate Review Sessions Instead of Cramming2026-08-22 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace an inherited AI-coach article containing an invented universal schedule, neuroscience explanations, adherence tracking, app promotion and unsupported transfer claims with a source-bounded distributed-practice protocol for verbal recall.
• Use an Extreme Seed, Then Return to Reality2026-08-22 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated session logs, keeper multipliers, percentage outcomes and tested-duration claims with a bounded provocation-to-feasible-idea exercise.
• Translate a Problem into a Nature-Inspired Design Principle2026-08-22 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated capacity, cleaning, communication and team outcomes with a bounded function-to-principle design exercise.
• Record What Would Change a Belief2026-08-22 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace numeric confidence prescriptions, fabricated observations and arbitrary update rules with a bounded belief-review record.
• Pause a Heated Disagreement and Test One Claim2026-08-22 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace fabricated trials, effect ranges and internal outcomes with a bounded disagreement-and-claim-check protocol.
• Write the Inclusion Rule Before Generalizing2026-08-22 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace an inherited article containing unsupported mistake reduction, conversion examples, sample prescriptions, statistical precision and fabricated work scenes with a bounded inclusion-rule and scope check.
• Check Whether a Streak Changes the Next Event2026-08-22 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace an inherited article containing fabricated tests, financial action rules, arbitrary confidence, sample and cost thresholds, and adherence claims with a bounded dependence-and-stop-rule check.
• Judge Each Option Against the Same Criteria2026-08-22 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace an inherited article containing fabricated trials, regret reduction, laboratory ranges, hiring outcomes and savings claims with a bounded independent-assessment protocol.
• Separate Observation from Human-Like Interpretation2026-08-22 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace an inherited article containing survey ranges, fabricated volunteer outcomes, self-reported effect claims, rigid observation quotas and app-first promotion with a bounded observation-and-alternative-explanation check.
• Ask for Feedback on One Specific Decision2026-08-22 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace an inherited Dunning-Kruger and feedback article containing fabricated internal trials, cohort outcomes, response-rate claims and arbitrary quotas with a bounded feedback request and review protocol.
• Run a Short, Concrete Information Interview2026-08-22 · reviewed · current: reviewed — Replace an inherited interview guide containing unsupported multipliers, sample claims, fabricated observations and arbitrary precision with a consent-based protocol for gathering concrete, correctable information.

How to read this ledger

The current status is derived from source provenance plus append-only lifecycle events. Existing editorial curation is exposed as legacy review provenance; new changes are recorded in data/hack-review-events.json.

Personal observations can trigger investigation but cannot change an evidence conclusion on their own. A material challenge or refutation requires traceable references.

Machine-readable review data Submit a challenge