973
224 reviewed or practical; 598 pending review; 151 restricted.
State of Practical Knowledge · 2026-08-19
How large, reviewed, structured, and machine-usable is Brali?
A reproducible snapshot built from the same datasets that power the public library. No traffic estimates, fake popularity scores, or decorative “AI confidence” numbers have been smuggled in.
23%
Publication-state coverage, not a claim that all entries have equal scientific support.
76.8%
747 of 973 entries map to at least one canonical Topic.
224
100 are in the current Flagship core.
50 Topics · 50 Zones
7 problem-first Topic Hubs are currently published.
65 candidates
63 reviewed Evidence Decisions are recorded.
50 cases
Maintained retrieval, evidence-boundary, multilingual, safety and no-answer scenarios.
4.7%
46 library entries have a recorded usable source in the evidence index.
How to read these numbers
Reviewed and practical are Brali publication states. They describe editorial trust handling, not one universal level of scientific proof. Topic coverage measures taxonomy mapping. Source coverage measures whether a usable source is recorded in the evidence index.
What changes over time
The Evidence Trends report tracks review activity and the evidence-state distribution. Brali Updates covers broader project changes, while Research & trends explains individual evidence corrections and new findings.
Intentional trust boundaries
Legacy Sensitive Collections → See which preserved archives are intentionally excluded from trusted recommendation and why.
Machine-readable snapshot
State snapshot JSON · Evidence index · Trusted Protocol Feed · AI integration guide