Research Gap · Learning & Thinking · Resolved

Which learning practices improve durable memory, and how should Brali separate retention from transfer and application?

Prefer meta-analyses and classroom/field studies that distinguish direct retention, forward effects, and application outcomes.

Resolved 2026-08-20. Memory moved from an ontology growth gap to active coverage after Brali reviewed current evidence on wakeful rest and retrieval practice, narrowed unsupported transfer claims, and published trusted protocols that preserve those evidence boundaries.

Evidence boundary

Do not collapse remembering, learning later material, and skill application into one testing-effect claim.

Discovery queries

Research candidates

Reviewed Evidence Decisions

Trusted Topic protocols

Closure rule

Brali does not close this gap because a paper exists or because a protocol sounds plausible. Closure requires an explicit resolution whose reviewed Evidence Decisions map to this Topic and whose referenced protocols are present in the trusted protocol feed for the same Topic.

Machine-readable gap record → · All research gaps →