Research Gap · Focus & Action · Ready for resolution review
Which lightweight decision-hygiene practices improve judgment or reduce avoidable errors outside tightly controlled laboratory tasks?
Prefer systematic reviews, meta-analyses, or field experiments on checklists, premortems, debiasing, or structured decision processes.
Still open. A reviewed Evidence Decision and trusted Topic protocol exist, but no explicit closure record exists yet.
Evidence boundary
Keep effects task-specific; do not promise that a checklist removes bias.
Discovery queries
decision making checklist premortem debiasing systematic review workplacegenerative AI human AI collaboration workflow calibration delegation agency self-efficacy systematic review randomized experiment organizational
Research candidates
- Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment · propose-protocol · 1984-12-01
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of educational approaches to reduce cognitive biases among students · support-existing · 2025-08-26
- Relying on AI at work reduces self-efficacy, ownership, and meaning while active collaboration mitigates the effects · propose-protocol · 2026-03-15
- Bias in the Loop: How Humans Evaluate AI-Generated Suggestions · propose-protocol · 2026-04-30
- Voice AI in Firms: A Natural Field Experiment on Automated Job Interviews · propose-protocol · 2025-08-18
Reviewed Evidence Decisions
- Bias in the Loop: How Humans Evaluate AI-Generated Suggestions · propose-protocol · reviewed 2026-08-29
- Voice AI in Firms: A Natural Field Experiment on Automated Job Interviews · propose-protocol · reviewed 2026-08-29
- Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment · propose-protocol · reviewed 2026-09-11
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of educational approaches to reduce cognitive biases among students · support-existing · reviewed 2026-09-11
- Relying on AI at work reduces self-efficacy, ownership, and meaning while active collaboration mitigates the effects · propose-protocol · reviewed 2026-08-26
Trusted Topic protocols
- AI-Assisted Premortem · practical
- Before You Commit to a Judgment, Consider the Opposite · reviewed
- Check the Operating Context Before Reusing a Decision · practical
- Check Whether a Streak Changes the Next Event · practical
- Check Whether Familiarity Is Driving a Low-Stakes Choice · practical
- Compare Two Approaches and Learn From the Result · practical
- Decision Calibration Journal · practical
- Judge Each Option Against the Same Criteria · practical
- Record What Would Change Your Confidence Before You Commit · practical
- Run One Disconfirming Check Before a Consequential Commitment · practical
- Separate Controllable Actions From Dependencies and Outcomes · practical
- Separate Outcomes From Actions You Can Control · practical
- Use AI to Widen the Option Set, Not Make the Decision · reviewed
- Use Elimination Rules to Narrow a Decision · practical
Closure rule
Brali does not close this gap because a paper exists or because a protocol sounds plausible. Closure requires an explicit resolution whose reviewed Evidence Decisions map to this Topic and whose referenced protocols are present in the trusted protocol feed for the same Topic.