{ "schema_version": 1, "dataset_version": "1.1.0", "name": "Brali Flagship 100 candidate queue", "policy": "/data/flagship-100-policy.json", "target_count": 100, "summary": { "candidates": 224, "eligible": 224, "ineligible": 0, "selected": 100, "gold_candidate_anchors": 20 }, "entries": [ { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:10-minute-morning-stretch-routine", "protocol_id": "brali:10-minute-morning-stretch-routine", "slug": "10-minute-morning-stretch-routine", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/10-minute-morning-stretch-routine/", "title": "Start a Morning Stretch Routine", "description": "Begin each day with a 10-minute stretch routine, increasing to 20 minutes over time.", "action": "Use a short, gentle flexibility routine as a morning movement cue if that timing suits you. Move slowly only as far as is comfortable, start with a few simple movements, and build up gradually rather than forcing a fixed 10-to-20-minute progression.", "check_in": "Did the movements feel comfortable and controlled? Did I stop or modify anything that caused pain or made me feel unwell, and is this routine still appropriate for me?", "life_area": { "slug": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "fit-life", "title": "Fit Life" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "fitness-strength", "title": "Fitness & Strength" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "health-energy", "growth_zone_slug": "fit-life" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/exercise/flexibility-exercises/", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "start-here-anchor" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 3, "selection_score": 1080, "selection_reason": "manual-start-here-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:10-minute-stress-walk", "protocol_id": "brali:10-minute-stress-walk", "slug": "10-minute-stress-walk", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/10-minute-stress-walk/", "title": "Take a Short Walk When Stress Builds", "description": "Whenever stress hits, take a quick 10-minute walk—whether it’s outside, around a park, or just circling your office.", "action": "When stress is building, consider a short, comfortable walk if walking is safe and practical for you. Treat ten minutes as a convenient boundary, not a medically proven dose. If a greener route is just as easy and safe, prefer it as a reasonable experiment rather than making a special trip. Then notice whether you feel any different before returning to the next task.", "check_in": "Did I take the walk? Was the route ordinary or relatively green? How did my stress or tension feel before and after, and did I return more able to continue the next task?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "no-depression", "title": "No Depression" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "stress-regulation", "title": "Stress Regulation" }, { "id": "movement", "title": "Movement" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "no-depression" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1802759/full", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": true, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 20, "selection_score": 980, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:20-20-20-eye-break-reminder", "protocol_id": "brali:20-20-20-eye-break-reminder", "slug": "20-20-20-eye-break-reminder", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/20-20-20-eye-break-reminder/", "title": "Use the 20-20-20 Rule for Screen Breaks", "description": "When you spend a long time looking at screens, take a short distance-viewing break: about every 20 minutes, look at something about 20 feet away for 20 seconds.", "action": "During long periods of screen use, take a short visual break about every 20 minutes and look at something about 20 feet away for 20 seconds. Use the reminder as a simple screen-rest cue, not as a treatment or a substitute for eye care.", "check_in": "Did I take regular screen breaks, and are eye strain, dryness, headaches, or blurred vision still bothering me enough that I should discuss them with an eye-care professional?", "life_area": { "slug": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-healthy", "title": "Be Healthy" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" }, { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "health-basics", "title": "Everyday Health Basics" }, { "id": "digital-wellbeing", "title": "Digital Wellbeing" }, { "id": "recovery-energy", "title": "Recovery & Energy" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "health-energy", "growth_zone_slug": "be-healthy" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.nei.nih.gov/eye-health-information/healthy-vision/how-eyes-work/keep-your-eyes-healthy", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": true, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 21, "selection_score": 980, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:3-minute-sensory-mindfulness-act", "protocol_id": "brali:3-minute-sensory-mindfulness-act", "slug": "3-minute-sensory-mindfulness-act", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/3-minute-sensory-mindfulness-act/", "title": "Use Your Senses to Return to the Present", "description": "Spend 3–5 minutes focusing on your senses. Notice what you see, hear, smell, feel, and taste. Gently redirect your attention whenever your mind wanders.", "action": "Pause somewhere safe and deliberately notice what is happening around you right now. Choose a few sights, sounds, textures, smells or tastes and describe them simply. When your attention drifts into planning, worry or commentary, notice that and gently return to one sensory detail.", "check_in": "What did I notice, how easy or difficult was it to return attention to the present, and did this feel useful enough to try again?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "act", "title": "ACT" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "self-awareness", "title": "Self-Awareness" }, { "id": "stress-regulation", "title": "Stress Regulation" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "act", "title": "ACT-derived" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "act" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.nhs.uk/every-mind-matters/mental-wellbeing-tips/what-is-mindfulness/", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 23, "selection_score": 98, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=12; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:4-minute-hiit-tabata-workout", "protocol_id": "brali:4-minute-hiit-tabata-workout", "slug": "4-minute-hiit-tabata-workout", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/4-minute-hiit-tabata-workout/", "title": "Try Short High-Intensity Intervals Safely", "description": "Perform a HIIT session with 20 seconds of intense exercise (like sprinting or jumping jacks) followed by 10 seconds of rest, repeated for 8 rounds.", "action": "If vigorous exercise is appropriate for your current fitness and health, choose a simple movement you can perform safely. You can use it as one short interval session, or as brief exercise snacks separated across the day when a full workout is unlikely. Make the effort challenging but controlled. Treat 20/10, 3 × 1 minute, 4 × 1 minute and similar timers as formats to adapt, not scientifically optimized doses.", "check_in": "Was the effort genuinely challenging but still controlled, could I repeat it without losing movement quality, and over several weeks is fitness or function trending in a useful direction rather than just my streak count?", "life_area": { "slug": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "fit-life", "title": "Fit Life" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "fitness-strength", "title": "Fitness & Strength" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "health-energy", "growth_zone_slug": "fit-life" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13486332/", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 30, "selection_score": 95, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=10; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:4-minute-tabata-hiit-timer", "protocol_id": "brali:4-minute-tabata-hiit-timer", "slug": "4-minute-tabata-hiit-timer", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/4-minute-tabata-hiit-timer/", "title": "Use a High-Intensity Interval Timer Safely", "description": "Follow the Tabata protocol: 20 seconds of very intense exercise (like burpees or mountain climbers) followed by 10 seconds of rest, repeated for 4 minutes (8 rounds).", "action": "If very vigorous exercise is suitable for you, use an interval timer to alternate a short period of harder work with recovery. A 20-second work and 10-second recovery pattern can be one option, but choose a movement and number of rounds you can control safely rather than treating 8 all-out rounds as mandatory.", "check_in": "What movement and interval did I use, was the effort appropriate for my fitness today, did I maintain control, and was there any pain or reason to stop?", "life_area": { "slug": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "fit-life", "title": "Fit Life" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "fitness-strength", "title": "Fitness & Strength" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "health-energy", "growth_zone_slug": "fit-life" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/exercise/physical-activity-guidelines-for-adults-aged-19-to-64/", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 39, "selection_score": 90, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=6; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:5-minute-meditation-habit-tracker", "protocol_id": "brali:5-minute-meditation-habit-tracker", "slug": "5-minute-meditation-habit-tracker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/5-minute-meditation-habit-tracker/", "title": "Try a Short Breath Meditation", "description": "Sit somewhere safe, let your breathing stay natural, notice when attention wanders, and bring it back. Five minutes is a convenient container, not a therapeutic dose or a test of whether you are good at calming down.", "action": "Sit somewhere comfortable and safe. Let breathing stay natural. Notice the sensations of breathing; when attention drifts into plans, memories, sounds or commentary, notice that and return to the breath without grading yourself. Use five minutes only if it is a convenient starting container. After several attempts, keep the practice only if it is useful for you.", "check_in": "Did I notice attention wandering and return without turning it into a fight? Was the practice useful, neutral or uncomfortable? Would another wellbeing practice fit me better today?", "life_area": { "slug": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-healthy", "title": "Be Healthy" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "health-basics", "title": "Everyday Health Basics" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "health-energy", "growth_zone_slug": "be-healthy" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.nhs.uk/every-mind-matters/mental-wellbeing-tips/how-to-meditate-for-beginners/", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 52, "selection_score": 84, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=2; topic-bonus=2" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:abdominal-breathing-stress-relief", "protocol_id": "brali:abdominal-breathing-stress-relief", "slug": "abdominal-breathing-stress-relief", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/abdominal-breathing-stress-relief/", "title": "Comfortable Diaphragmatic Breathing", "description": "Try a few slow, comfortable breaths while noticing the abdomen move. Keep the exercise easy, stop if it feels uncomfortable, and do not use it instead of medical care.", "action": "Sit or lie in a comfortable position, let the breath slow without forcing a count, notice the abdomen rise and fall, and stop after a few easy cycles or whenever you prefer.", "check_in": "Did the exercise feel comfortable and leave you ready for the next ordinary action? Stop if you feel dizzy, short of breath, distressed, or otherwise unwell.", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "body-oriented", "title": "Body-Oriented" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "stress-regulation", "title": "Stress Regulation" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "body-oriented", "title": "Body-oriented Therapy-derived" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "body-oriented" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/relaxation-techniques-what-you-need-to-know", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 58, "selection_score": 82, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=2" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:active-recall-test-yourself", "protocol_id": "brali:active-recall-test-yourself", "slug": "active-recall-test-yourself", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/active-recall-test-yourself/", "title": "Active Recall: Close the Notes and Make Memory Work", "description": "Before rereading, hide the source and try to produce the answer from memory. Then check it, fix the misses, and practice application separately if the real goal is solving, speaking, writing, or doing. Familiarity feels nice; retrieval tells you what is actually available without the page in front of you.", "action": "Choose a small set of material you want to retain. Hide the source and answer a question, explain the idea, or write what you remember. Check immediately enough to catch errors and repair them. Then, if success means solving, writing, speaking, calculating, or performing, practice that outcome too. Memory practice is useful; it is not a teleportation device to skill.", "check_in": "What could I retrieve without looking? What was missing or wrong? If the real goal is application, could I actually use the knowledge in a relevant task?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "memory", "title": "Memory" }, { "id": "skill-learning", "title": "Skill Learning" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "retrieval-practice", "title": "Retrieval Practice" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 13, "selection_score": 980, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-code-scaffold-test-loop", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-code-scaffold-test-loop", "slug": "ai-code-scaffold-test-loop", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-code-scaffold-test-loop/", "title": "Use AI to Scaffold Code, Then Make Tests Decide", "description": "Use AI to produce a first implementation for a bounded coding task, then inspect the diff, run tests, add missing edge cases, and reject code you cannot explain. A controlled experiment found faster completion on one coding task; it did not establish universal software quality gains.", "action": "Define the behavior and constraints first. Ask AI for a small implementation. Read the diff, run the existing test suite, add tests for edge cases and failure paths, and inspect security or data-handling implications. Keep only code you can explain and maintain.", "check_in": "Did AI shorten implementation time without increasing code I do not understand, test, or want to own?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" }, { "id": "qa", "title": "Quality Assurance" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.06590", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 56, "selection_score": 83, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-customer-reply-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-customer-reply-coach", "slug": "ai-customer-reply-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-customer-reply-coach/", "title": "Let AI Draft Routine Replies, Keep the Human on the Conversation", "description": "For repetitive support or service messages, AI can propose a response from the case facts and approved guidance while the human checks diagnosis, policy, tone, and the actual next step. Large-scale field evidence supports gains in one customer-support setting, especially for less experienced workers.", "action": "Provide only information you are allowed to share, plus the customer question and approved policy or knowledge source. Ask for a concise draft. Check that it answers the real issue, does not invent policy or status, and gives the correct next action before sending.", "check_in": "Did the suggestion save wording effort while leaving the human more attentive to the customer's actual problem?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" }, { "id": "difficult-conversations", "title": "Difficult Conversations" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": true, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 27, "selection_score": 96, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=10; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-decision-alternatives", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-decision-alternatives", "slug": "ai-decision-alternatives", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-decision-alternatives/", "title": "Use AI to Widen the Option Set, Not Make the Decision", "description": "When a decision feels binary or prematurely settled, ask AI for plausible alternatives, missing criteria, and arguments against your current favorite. Verify factual claims independently and keep the final weighting of trade-offs human.", "action": "Write your objective, constraints, and current leading option. Ask AI for materially different alternatives, missing criteria, and the strongest case against your favorite. Verify any external facts, then compare options using your own criteria and downside limits. Do not ask the model to hide the trade-off inside a single confident recommendation.", "check_in": "Did AI reveal an option, criterion, or counterargument I had missed without becoming the authority that decides what I value?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" }, { "id": "error-prevention", "title": "Error Prevention" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60220-5", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 32, "selection_score": 94, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=8; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-idea-divergence-pass", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-idea-divergence-pass", "slug": "ai-idea-divergence-pass", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-idea-divergence-pass/", "title": "Use AI to Widen the Idea Set Before You Choose", "description": "When you are stuck on the first obvious idea, use AI to generate alternatives across different assumptions or constraints. Experimental evidence suggests generative AI can raise judged creativity in some ideation tasks; it does not decide which idea fits your real context.", "action": "State the problem and constraints. Ask for several directions that must differ from one another in a named way. Cluster similar answers, discard obvious filler, and evaluate the remaining options against real constraints and evidence.", "check_in": "Did AI add genuinely different options, or merely rephrase the same idea several times?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "idea-generation", "title": "Idea Generation" }, { "id": "creative-problem-solving", "title": "Creative Problem Solving" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01953-1", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 36, "selection_score": 92, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=6; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-learning-attempt-feedback-retest", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-learning-attempt-feedback-retest", "slug": "ai-learning-attempt-feedback-retest", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-learning-attempt-feedback-retest/", "title": "Attempt First, Use AI for Feedback, Retest Without It", "description": "For learning tasks, make a genuine attempt before asking AI to explain, critique, or extend your work, then reproduce the target skill without assistance. Recent evidence on generative AI in education is mixed enough that the workflow should preserve learner activity rather than assume the chatbot itself improves learning.", "action": "Name the skill you are actually trying to acquire. Attempt a problem, explanation, translation, derivation, or answer unaided. Ask AI to identify gaps, give a contrasting example, or explain one sticking point. Check the feedback against trusted material when accuracy matters, then perform a fresh attempt without AI.", "check_in": "Can I now perform or explain the target skill without leaning on the AI output?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "skill-learning", "title": "Skill Learning" }, { "id": "metacognition", "title": "Metacognition" }, { "id": "memory", "title": "Memory" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-026-11665-9", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 47, "selection_score": 85, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-professional-writing-draft", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-professional-writing-draft", "slug": "ai-professional-writing-draft", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-professional-writing-draft/", "title": "Draft Professional Writing with AI, Then Take Back the Edit", "description": "For routine professional writing, give AI the purpose, audience, constraints, and source facts, ask for a draft, then revise it yourself. Controlled evidence supports productivity gains for some professional writing tasks, not automatic accuracy or judgment.", "action": "Provide the audience, goal, source facts, must-include points, and constraints. Ask for one draft. Compare it with the source material, remove invented details, restore your own judgment and voice, and send only the version you can defend without the model in the room.", "check_in": "Did AI reduce drafting time without introducing claims, tone, or commitments I would not have written myself?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "writing", "title": "Writing" }, { "id": "revision-feedback", "title": "Revision & Feedback" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 48, "selection_score": 85, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-source-summary-verification", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-source-summary-verification", "slug": "ai-source-summary-verification", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-source-summary-verification/", "title": "Summarize with AI, Then Reconcile Against the Source", "description": "For a long document you are allowed to process, ask AI for a structured summary tied to the source, then verify the claims that will affect a decision, message, or deliverable. The summary is navigation; the source remains the authority.", "action": "Provide only material you are permitted to share. Ask for a summary with sections, explicit uncertainties, and source locations when available. Mark the claims that affect your decision, then open the source and verify those claims directly before reusing them.", "check_in": "Can I point from every important statement in my final output back to the original source rather than to the AI summary?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "information-management", "title": "Information Management" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" }, { "id": "qa", "title": "Quality Assurance" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-60220-5", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 40, "selection_score": 90, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=4; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-task-frontier-test", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-task-frontier-test", "slug": "ai-task-frontier-test", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-task-frontier-test/", "title": "Benchmark AI on the Task Before You Trust the Workflow", "description": "AI performance is uneven across tasks that can look similarly difficult. Before redesigning a workflow around a model, run it on representative cases, score the outputs against a human-defined standard, and identify where human review is still mandatory.", "action": "Choose a small sample containing easy, ordinary, and awkward cases. Define what counts as acceptable before running the model. Compare AI output with the source or a trusted human result, record failure patterns, and decide which cases can be assisted, which need review, and which should stay human-first.", "check_in": "Do I know the cases where AI is reliable enough to help and the cases where its polished answer should not be trusted?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" }, { "id": "strategy", "title": "Strategy" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://aiinstitute.hbs.edu/navigating-the-jagged-technological-frontier/", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 43, "selection_score": 88, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=2; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ask-a-peer-to-proofread", "protocol_id": "brali:ask-a-peer-to-proofread", "slug": "ask-a-peer-to-proofread", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ask-a-peer-to-proofread/", "title": "Match Feedback to the Revision Target", "description": "When revising a student or learning-focused draft, decide whether the current pass targets surface features such as grammar and wording or deeper features such as ideas, organization, and coherence. Ask the reviewer to focus feedback on that target, revise at the same level, and use a separate pass when the other level also matters.", "action": "Before asking for feedback on a student or learning-focused draft, choose the current revision target. Use a surface pass for grammar, spelling, wording, and similar features; use a deep pass for ideas, organization, coherence, or other meaning-level features. Tell the reviewer which level you want them to focus on, revise against that target, and run a separate pass if the other level also needs work.", "check_in": "What was the revision target for this pass, and did the feedback actually help you revise at that level?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "avoid-errors", "title": "Avoid Errors" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "writing", "title": "Writing" }, { "id": "revision-feedback", "title": "Revision & Feedback" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "avoid-errors" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101961", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-21" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 24, "selection_score": 98, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=12; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:avoid-list-interference-memory-retention", "protocol_id": "brali:avoid-list-interference-memory-retention", "slug": "avoid-list-interference-memory-retention", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/avoid-list-interference-memory-retention/", "title": "Try Quiet Wakeful Rest After Learning", "description": "After learning declarative material you want to remember, try a short period of quiet, minimally stimulating wakeful rest before switching to another demanding task. Treat it as a personal memory experiment, not a general learning upgrade or a universal ten-minute rule.", "action": "When you finish a focused memory-heavy learning episode, put aside the material and spend a brief period awake in a quiet, low-stimulation setting. Avoid immediately switching to another cognitively demanding task. Choose a duration that is practical for you, then return to normal activity. Do not use the pause as a substitute for self-testing, active review, or other learning methods.", "check_in": "What did I learn, did I actually create a low-interference pause afterward, and when I checked later did recall seem better, unchanged, or worse than usual?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "memory", "title": "Memory" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13423-025-02778-3", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 14, "selection_score": 980, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:batch-non-urgent-notifications", "protocol_id": "brali:batch-non-urgent-notifications", "slug": "batch-non-urgent-notifications", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/batch-non-urgent-notifications/", "title": "Batch Non-Urgent Notifications Instead of Receiving Them All Day", "description": "Group non-urgent smartphone notifications into a few predictable delivery windows while keeping genuinely urgent channels available. The useful idea is predictable batching, not a magic number of batches.", "action": "Choose the apps whose alerts are useful but rarely urgent. Use your phone's notification summary, scheduled focus mode, or another reversible setting to deliver those alerts in predictable windows. Keep calls, selected contacts, security alerts, calendars, or other genuinely time-sensitive channels outside the batch. Start with a schedule that fits your day rather than copying the study's three-times-a-day condition as a universal rule.", "check_in": "Did I feel interrupted less often without creating missed urgent information, compulsive manual checking, or anxiety about what I could not see?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "do-it", "title": "Do It" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" }, { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "digital-attention", "title": "Digital Attention" }, { "id": "attention-focus", "title": "Attention & Focus" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "do-it" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.016", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-11" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 28, "selection_score": 96, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=10; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:cardio-health-daily-habits", "protocol_id": "brali:cardio-health-daily-habits", "slug": "cardio-health-daily-habits", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/cardio-health-daily-habits/", "title": "Build Toward a Weekly Movement Baseline", "description": "Plan how ordinary walking, moderate activity, vigorous activity or strength work can fit your week. Adapt the plan to your abilities and medical guidance rather than forcing one routine.", "action": "Look at the coming week, mark the activity you already do, then add realistic walking, moderate or vigorous activity, and strength sessions where they fit. Build gradually rather than treating the guideline as a one-day target.", "check_in": "Does the plan fit your current ability, schedule and any guidance from your health professional? Adjust it rather than forcing a target that is inappropriate for you.", "life_area": { "slug": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cardio-doc", "title": "Cardio Doc" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cardiovascular-health", "title": "Cardiovascular Health" }, { "id": "movement", "title": "Movement" }, { "id": "health-basics", "title": "Everyday Health Basics" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "health-energy", "growth_zone_slug": "cardio-doc" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-lifestyle/lifes-essential-8/how-to-be-more-active-fact-sheet", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 25, "selection_score": 98, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=12; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:cbt-action-mood-tracker", "protocol_id": "brali:cbt-action-mood-tracker", "slug": "cbt-action-mood-tracker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/cbt-action-mood-tracker/", "title": "Action and Mood Observation Note", "description": "Use a short note to compare an activity with what you noticed before and after it. Treat the note as observation, not proof that an activity caused a mood change.", "action": "Write the situation, the activity you chose, how you felt before, and how you felt afterward. Add one alternative explanation so the note does not turn correlation into certainty.", "check_in": "What did you observe, and what would be worth trying or discussing next without assuming the activity caused the change?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cbt", "title": "CBT" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "self-awareness", "title": "Self-Awareness" }, { "id": "emotion-regulation", "title": "Emotion Regulation" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "cbt", "title": "CBT-derived" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "cbt" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.nhs.uk/tests-and-treatments/cognitive-behavioural-therapy-cbt/", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 29, "selection_score": 96, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=10; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:consider-the-opposite", "protocol_id": "brali:consider-the-opposite", "slug": "consider-the-opposite", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/consider-the-opposite/", "title": "Before You Commit to a Judgment, Consider the Opposite", "description": "When a judgment matters and you already feel convinced, deliberately generate a plausible explanation, evidence pattern, or outcome that would point the other way. Use it as a bias check, not as a rule to distrust every conclusion.", "action": "Write your current conclusion in one sentence. Then ask: what evidence, mechanism, or alternative explanation could make the opposite conclusion reasonable? Generate a concrete alternative rather than telling yourself to be objective. Check whether your decision would change if that alternative were true. Use this on decisions where biased assimilation or one-sided hypothesis testing is a real risk; do not turn it into endless doubt about routine choices.", "check_in": "What plausible disconfirming case did I generate, and did it reveal a missing fact, a weak assumption, or no meaningful reason to change course?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "avoid-errors", "title": "Avoid Errors" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" }, { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "avoid-errors" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1231", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-11" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 33, "selection_score": 94, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=8; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:daily-gratitude-journal-three-things", "protocol_id": "brali:daily-gratitude-journal-three-things", "slug": "daily-gratitude-journal-three-things", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/daily-gratitude-journal-three-things/", "title": "Specific Gratitude Note", "description": "Write one to three specific things you appreciated and why they mattered. Keep the practice optional and factual; gratitude is not a requirement to feel positive or a substitute for care.", "action": "Choose one to three concrete moments, people, resources or actions from the day. Write what happened and one sentence about why it mattered to you. Skip the practice when it feels forced or unhelpful.", "check_in": "Did the note help you notice something specific, or did it feel mechanical, invalidating, or like another obligation? Keep, change, or drop it accordingly.", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "positive-psychotherapy", "title": "Positive Psychotherapy" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "mood-wellbeing", "title": "Mood & Wellbeing" }, { "id": "self-awareness", "title": "Self-Awareness" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "positive-psychotherapy", "title": "Positive Psychotherapy-derived" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "positive-psychotherapy" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40627390/", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": true, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 34, "selection_score": 94, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=8; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:dbt-distress-tolerance-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:dbt-distress-tolerance-coach", "slug": "dbt-distress-tolerance-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/dbt-distress-tolerance-coach/", "title": "Pause Before Acting on a High-Stress Urge", "description": "When a situation is safe enough to pause, notice the urge to react, describe what is happening, choose a harmless short delay, and then reassess the next action. This is not full DBT or crisis care.", "action": "Pause. Describe the situation in one factual sentence and name the action urge without judging it. Choose a harmless brief activity that creates time rather than escalating the situation. Then reassess what action is safest and most useful.", "check_in": "Did you create a pause without making the situation worse, and what safe next action did you choose? Do not score success by whether the emotion disappeared.", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "dbt", "title": "DBT" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "emotion-regulation", "title": "Emotion Regulation" }, { "id": "stress-regulation", "title": "Stress Regulation" }, { "id": "self-awareness", "title": "Self-Awareness" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "dbt", "title": "DBT-derived" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "dbt" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.dorsethealthcare.nhs.uk/our-services-and-sites/mental-health-and-learning-disabilities/intensive-psychological-therapies/dialectical-behaviour-therapy-dbt", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 45, "selection_score": 87, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=2; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:deliberate-email-checking-windows", "protocol_id": "brali:deliberate-email-checking-windows", "slug": "deliberate-email-checking-windows", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/deliberate-email-checking-windows/", "title": "Check Email in Deliberate Windows Instead of Continuously", "description": "If constant inbox checking fragments your day, test a few deliberate email windows and close the inbox between them. Match the schedule to real response expectations rather than copying a fixed number from a study.", "action": "Choose a small number of email windows that still meet the real response expectations of your work and personal life. Close or hide the inbox between those windows and disable nonessential email alerts. Keep a separate urgent channel for issues that genuinely cannot wait. Do not treat three checks per day as a universal rule; that was the experimental condition, not an optimized schedule.", "check_in": "Was my day less stressful or fragmented, did I miss anything genuinely time-sensitive, and did I compensate by manually reopening the inbox anyway?", "life_area": { "slug": "work-money-strategy", "title": "Work, Money & Strategy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "work", "title": "Work" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" }, { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "digital-attention", "title": "Digital Attention" }, { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "work-money-strategy", "growth_zone_slug": "work" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.005", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-11" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 31, "selection_score": 95, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=10; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:genuine-micro-conversation", "protocol_id": "brali:genuine-micro-conversation", "slug": "genuine-micro-conversation", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/genuine-micro-conversation/", "title": "Turn One Routine Exchange into a Genuine Micro-Conversation", "description": "When the situation is relaxed and the other person seems willing, make one routine exchange slightly more human: eye contact, a real greeting, or a brief conversation. Treat it as a small social opportunity, not a cure for loneliness.", "action": "Pick an ordinary low-pressure interaction that already needs to happen: buying coffee, greeting a neighbor, talking to a receptionist, or another brief exchange. If the context is appropriate, make eye contact, greet the person, and add one natural sentence or question. Keep it short and responsive to the other person's cues. If they are busy, uncomfortable, or not interested, let the interaction stay efficient.", "check_in": "Did the interaction feel more connected without becoming intrusive, and did the other person seem willing to engage?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "relationships", "title": "Relationships" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "relationships", "title": "Relationships" }, { "id": "social-confidence", "title": "Social Confidence" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "relationships" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613502990", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-11" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 22, "selection_score": 100, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=14; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:grayscale-phone-friction", "protocol_id": "brali:grayscale-phone-friction", "slug": "grayscale-phone-friction", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/grayscale-phone-friction/", "title": "Make Your Phone Less Visually Tempting with Grayscale", "description": "If you want to spend less time on your phone, try switching the display to grayscale for a bounded trial. Treat it as friction against habitual use, not as a productivity, sleep, or mental-health upgrade.", "action": "Enable grayscale on your phone and leave the rest of your normal setup alone for a bounded trial. Use the phone when you actually need it; the point is not abstinence. Notice whether automatic checking becomes less attractive. If color is important for navigation, accessibility, work, photos, or another real task, switch color back on for that task instead of treating grayscale as a purity test.", "check_in": "Did my phone screen time or automatic checking change, and did I simply move the same distraction to another device?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "do-it", "title": "Do It" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "digital-attention", "title": "Digital Attention" }, { "id": "environment-design", "title": "Environment Design" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "do-it" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/digital-health/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2026.1816095/full", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-11" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 37, "selection_score": 92, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=6; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:guided-pmr-muscle-relaxation", "protocol_id": "brali:guided-pmr-muscle-relaxation", "slug": "guided-pmr-muscle-relaxation", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/guided-pmr-muscle-relaxation/", "title": "Try Progressive Muscle Relaxation Gently", "description": "Tightly squeeze each muscle group for five seconds, then relax it for thirty seconds, moving from your toes up to your head.", "action": "Sit or lie somewhere comfortable and work through a few muscle groups one at a time. Gently tense each group for no more than about five seconds, then release it and notice the contrast. Do not strain, and skip or release any area that causes significant discomfort. If sleep is your target, use PMR as a repeatable wind-down experiment rather than a one-night sleep test.", "check_in": "Did I practise without pain or straining? If I am using PMR for sleep, across several attempts did winding down or my subjective sleep feel meaningfully easier, unchanged, or worse?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "no-depression", "title": "No Depression" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "mood-wellbeing", "title": "Mood & Wellbeing" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "no-depression" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.rbht.nhs.uk/our-services/clinical_support/rehabilitation-and-therapies/psychological-medicine/relaxation-exercises", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": true, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 49, "selection_score": 85, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ideal-sleep-hours-finder", "protocol_id": "brali:ideal-sleep-hours-finder", "slug": "ideal-sleep-hours-finder", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ideal-sleep-hours-finder/", "title": "Protect Enough Sleep Opportunity and Track Daytime Function", "description": "If your sleep is routinely short, protect a realistic window that gives you enough opportunity to sleep and observe simple trends in sleep timing and daytime alertness. Do not deliberately restrict sleep to search for an 'optimal' number or treat one bad night as a result.", "action": "Choose a bedtime-to-wake window that fits your obligations and gives you a reasonable opportunity for enough sleep. For a week or two, record only a few things: roughly when you tried to sleep, when you got up, whether the night was unusually disrupted, and how alert or sleepy you felt during the day. Look for repeated patterns, not single-night scores. Change one practical constraint at a time, such as moving bedtime earlier when your current schedule routinely leaves too little time for sleep.", "check_in": "Did I give myself enough opportunity to sleep, what did my actual sleep/wake pattern look like, and was daytime alertness broadly better, unchanged, or worse over several days?", "life_area": { "slug": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-healthy", "title": "Be Healthy" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "sleep-circadian", "title": "Sleep & Circadian Rhythm" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "health-energy", "growth_zone_slug": "be-healthy" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34507028/", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-19" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 19, "selection_score": 980, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:if-then-rules-productivity", "protocol_id": "brali:if-then-rules-productivity", "slug": "if-then-rules-productivity", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/if-then-rules-productivity/", "title": "Turn a Good Intention into an If-Then Plan", "description": "Turn a repeated low-stakes choice into a simple cue-and-action rule, add a fallback for common exceptions, and revise the rule when it creates friction or no longer fits the work.", "action": "Choose one repeated situation, describe the cue in observable terms, choose a small action you can safely perform when the cue appears, add a fallback for a common exception, use the rule when the situation occurs, and revise or retire it when it stops fitting the work.", "check_in": "Did the cue occur, did I follow the chosen action, what exception appeared, and should the rule stay, change, or be removed?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "do-it", "title": "Do It" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" }, { "id": "habits-consistency", "title": "Habits & Consistency" }, { "id": "task-initiation", "title": "Task Initiation" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "implementation-intentions", "title": "Implementation Intentions" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "do-it" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2024.2334563", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-11" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 41, "selection_score": 90, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=4; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:post-meal-walk", "protocol_id": "brali:post-meal-walk", "slug": "post-meal-walk", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/post-meal-walk/", "title": "Walk Soon After a Meal When You Would Otherwise Sit", "description": "When it is safe and practical, replace some sitting after a meal with comfortable walking. Evidence supports an acute effect on post-meal glucose, not a universal walking dose or long-term treatment claim.", "action": "After a meal, choose an ordinary walk that feels comfortable and fits the situation. Starting relatively soon after eating matches the direction of the reviewed acute evidence better than deliberately waiting a long time, but Brali does not prescribe a universal minute mark, pace, or duration. If you use glucose-lowering medication, have a condition affected by exercise or meals, or have been given specific activity advice, follow your clinical plan instead of using this page as treatment guidance.", "check_in": "Did the walk replace sitting without causing discomfort or disrupting a medical plan, and is it practical enough to repeat when useful?", "life_area": { "slug": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "fit-life", "title": "Fit Life" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "movement", "title": "Movement" }, { "id": "health-basics", "title": "Everyday Health Basics" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "health-energy", "growth_zone_slug": "fit-life" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10036272/", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-11" }, "sensitive": true, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 44, "selection_score": 88, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=4; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:prequestions-before-learning", "protocol_id": "brali:prequestions-before-learning", "slug": "prequestions-before-learning", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/prequestions-before-learning/", "title": "Ask a Few Questions Before You Start Learning", "description": "Before reading, watching, or studying new material, try a few questions about the specific information you want to learn. Attempt an answer, then study and check it. Evidence supports better learning for the prequestioned information, not a general boost to everything else.", "action": "Choose a small set of questions that point to information you genuinely want to learn. Before opening the explanation, reading the chapter, or watching the lesson, make a brief attempt at each answer even if you are unsure. Then study normally, paying attention when the material resolves those questions. Afterward, check the answers against the source. Use this to target important information, not as a claim that every unasked detail will also be learned better.", "check_in": "After studying, can I answer the questions accurately without looking, and did the questions point me toward information that actually mattered?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "skill-sprint", "title": "Skill Sprint" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "memory", "title": "Memory" }, { "id": "skill-learning", "title": "Skill Learning" }, { "id": "metacognition", "title": "Metacognition" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "skill-sprint" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10075-7", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 53, "selection_score": 84, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ready-to-resume-plan", "protocol_id": "brali:ready-to-resume-plan", "slug": "ready-to-resume-plan", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ready-to-resume-plan/", "title": "Leave a Ready-to-Resume Note Before You Switch Tasks", "description": "When you must leave unfinished work, capture where you stopped, the next concrete action, and one critical restart detail before switching. The goal is a cleaner return, not eliminating every cost of interruption.", "action": "Use this only when unfinished work is about to be interrupted or deliberately parked. Before switching, capture three pieces of information in whatever format fits the task: your current state, the next concrete action, and one critical detail or open question that would otherwise have to be reconstructed. Then switch. When you return, read the note and start from the recorded next action rather than re-scanning the entire task.", "check_in": "When I returned, could I identify the next action quickly, or did I still have to reconstruct the task from scratch?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "do-it", "title": "Do It" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "attention-focus", "title": "Attention & Focus" }, { "id": "task-initiation", "title": "Task Initiation" }, { "id": "planning-prioritization", "title": "Planning & Prioritization" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "do-it" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1184", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-11" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 46, "selection_score": 87, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=2; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:refocus-present-stop-mind-wandering", "protocol_id": "brali:refocus-present-stop-mind-wandering", "slug": "refocus-present-stop-mind-wandering", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/refocus-present-stop-mind-wandering/", "title": "Deliberate Attention Switching with Everyday Sounds", "description": "Use several neutral sounds around you to practice deliberately selecting one sound, switching to another, and then noticing several at once. Treat this as an attention-flexibility drill, not a treatment for worry, anxiety, or another condition.", "action": "Find a safe place with several ordinary sounds. Attend closely to one sound without needing to block the others. Deliberately switch to a second and then a third sound. Finish by broadening attention so several sounds can be noticed together. Keep the exercise brief and stop when you choose.", "check_in": "Could you intentionally select, switch, and broaden attention? Record the skill you practiced, not whether worry or another symptom changed.", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "metacognitive", "title": "Metacognitive" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "attention-focus", "title": "Attention & Focus" }, { "id": "metacognition", "title": "Metacognition" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "metacognitive-therapy", "title": "Metacognitive Therapy-derived" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "metacognitive" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42344681/", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": true, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 38, "selection_score": 92, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=6; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:relationship-repair-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:relationship-repair-coach", "slug": "relationship-repair-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/relationship-repair-coach/", "title": "Make a Specific Repair Attempt After a Workable Conflict", "description": "After a misunderstanding or conflict where it is safe to re-engage, make a specific repair attempt: name what you did, acknowledge the likely impact without arguing about intent, apologize for your part, offer a concrete corrective action, and invite the other person's view. Do not demand forgiveness or immediate reconciliation.", "action": "Wait until you can speak without escalating. Name the specific action or words you are taking responsibility for. Acknowledge the impact as you understand it without using your intention to cancel the other person's experience. Apologize for your part without an 'if'. Offer one concrete repair or behavior change you can actually make, then ask how the other person sees it. Listen to the answer. Do not require forgiveness, agreement, or immediate trust in return.", "check_in": "Did I own a specific part without defending it, offer a realistic repair, and give the other person room to respond or decline?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "relationships", "title": "Relationships" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "conflict-repair", "title": "Conflict & Repair" }, { "id": "relationships", "title": "Relationships" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "relationships" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34162912/", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-19" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 26, "selection_score": 98, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=12; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:safety-statements-exposure-anxiety", "protocol_id": "brali:safety-statements-exposure-anxiety", "slug": "safety-statements-exposure-anxiety", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/safety-statements-exposure-anxiety/", "title": "Practice Facing a Small Fear Gradually", "description": "When facing a fear, remind yourself that you’re safe. Repeat phrases like, ‘I am safe,’ ‘This is just a feeling,’ or ‘I can handle this.’", "action": "Choose one situation you avoid because it feels frightening but that is not actually dangerous. Break it into smaller steps, start with a manageable step, approach it gradually, and notice what happens rather than trying to force fear away with a required phrase or ritual.", "check_in": "What step did I try, how difficult did it feel before and after, what did I learn, and what would be a sensible next step?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "exposure", "title": "Exposure" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "fear-confidence", "title": "Fear & Confidence" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "exposure", "title": "Exposure-derived" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "exposure" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.nhs.uk/every-mind-matters/mental-wellbeing-tips/self-help-cbt-techniques/facing-your-fears/", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 42, "selection_score": 90, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=4; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:savor-positive-moment", "protocol_id": "brali:savor-positive-moment", "slug": "savor-positive-moment", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/savor-positive-moment/", "title": "Pause Long Enough to Notice a Good Moment", "description": "When something genuinely pleasant is already happening, give it a little deliberate attention instead of rushing past it. This is a conservative savoring practice, not a rule to feel positive or reinterpret difficult experiences.", "action": "Choose a positive experience that is already real: a good meal, a joke, a quiet walk, finishing useful work, music, a kind message, or another ordinary moment. For a short period, stop adding new input. Notice one or two concrete details and what makes the moment worth noticing. Then continue your day. Do not use the exercise to deny an unpleasant feeling or to manufacture gratitude for something that is not good.", "check_in": "Did I actually stay with a positive experience for a moment, and did the practice feel useful, neutral, awkward, or forced?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-positive", "title": "Be Positive" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "mood-wellbeing", "title": "Mood & Wellbeing" }, { "id": "self-awareness", "title": "Self-Awareness" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "be-positive" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.70134", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-11" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 54, "selection_score": 84, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:self-explain-what-you-learn", "protocol_id": "brali:self-explain-what-you-learn", "slug": "self-explain-what-you-learn", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/self-explain-what-you-learn/", "title": "Explain What You Just Learned in Your Own Words", "description": "After a meaningful chunk of digital learning, pause and explain the idea, relationship, or step in your own words, then compare with the source and correct gaps. Meta-analytic evidence supports self-explanation in digital learning, with meaningful variation across contexts and material types.", "action": "Study a manageable chunk, then look away from the explanation and produce a brief self-explanation: what the idea means, why a step follows, how it connects to what you already know, or when it would apply. Compare your explanation with the source, identify one gap or error, and revise it. Use the prompts that fit the material; do not turn every paragraph into a compulsory monologue.", "check_in": "Can I explain the idea accurately enough to reconstruct the key relationship or step, and what did I have to correct after checking the source?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "skill-sprint", "title": "Skill Sprint" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "skill-learning", "title": "Skill Learning" }, { "id": "metacognition", "title": "Metacognition" }, { "id": "memory", "title": "Memory" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "skill-sprint" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10001-x", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 57, "selection_score": 83, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:spaced-recall-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:spaced-recall-coach", "slug": "spaced-recall-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/spaced-recall-coach/", "title": "Separate Review Sessions Instead of Cramming", "description": "For verbal material you need to recall later, divide repeated study across separate sessions instead of concentrating the same planned review into one sitting. Choose the gap in relation to the intended retention period, then check recall and adjust rather than following one universal schedule.", "action": "Choose one set of verbal material and decide how long you need to retain it. Split the planned repetitions across at least two sessions separated by time. Use a longer gap when the required retention period is longer, then check final recall and adjust the next schedule instead of treating one interval as universally optimal.", "check_in": "Did I separate the study episodes rather than cram them together, and did the chosen gap fit the period over which I needed to remember the material?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "memory", "title": "Memory" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 59, "selection_score": 81, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=1" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:stop-caffeine-after-lunch", "protocol_id": "brali:stop-caffeine-after-lunch", "slug": "stop-caffeine-after-lunch", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/stop-caffeine-after-lunch/", "title": "Move Caffeine Earlier When Sleep Matters", "description": "If caffeine may be reaching into the night, move the last dose earlier and reduce large late-day doses. A 2025 randomized crossover trial found that a single 400 mg dose disrupted several sleep measures even when taken many hours before bed; a small 100 mg dose did not show a significant effect at the tested timings. That is a reason to be dose-aware, not a license for one universal cutoff.", "action": "For one or two weeks, note the time and rough amount of your last caffeine, your bedtime, and whether sleep onset, overnight restfulness, and next-day sleepiness are broadly better or worse. Start by moving the last large dose earlier or reducing it; do not deliberately take caffeine late just to test your tolerance.", "check_in": "When was my last caffeine, roughly how much was it, and did sleep and next-day alertness look better, worse, or unchanged across several days?", "life_area": { "slug": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-healthy", "title": "Be Healthy" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "sleep-circadian", "title": "Sleep & Circadian Rhythm" }, { "id": "health-basics", "title": "Everyday Health Basics" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "health-energy", "growth_zone_slug": "be-healthy" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11985402/", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-06" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 35, "selection_score": 93, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=8; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:talk-about-fears-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:talk-about-fears-coach", "slug": "talk-about-fears-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/talk-about-fears-coach/", "title": "Talk About a Fear With Someone You Trust", "description": "Share your fears with a trusted friend, family member, or therapist.", "action": "Choose someone you trust and tell them, in your own words, what you are worried or afraid about. You can also say what kind of support you want, such as listening, practical help, or simply company. Keep the conversation within boundaries that feel appropriate for both of you.", "check_in": "Who did I talk to, what did I want from the conversation, did I feel heard or supported, and is there any next step I need?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "no-fears", "title": "No Fears" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "fear-confidence", "title": "Fear & Confidence" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "no-fears" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://www.nhs.uk/every-mind-matters/mental-wellbeing-tips/how-to-talk-about-your-mental-health/", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 50, "selection_score": 85, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:temptation-bundling", "protocol_id": "brali:temptation-bundling", "slug": "temptation-bundling", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/temptation-bundling/", "title": "Pair a Useful Task with Something You Genuinely Want", "description": "Pair a beneficial activity that is easy to postpone with a compatible pleasure you already enjoy. Temptation bundling has field-experiment support for exercise, but it is not a universal habit formula and effects can fade.", "action": "Choose one 'should' behavior that is useful but easy to delay and one 'want' experience that can happen at the same time without making the task worse. Examples might include a favorite audiobook during a walk or routine cardio, a preferred podcast while doing repetitive household work, or another compatible pairing. If you want a stronger commitment device, reserve that entertainment for the target activity. Keep the pairing safe: do not add absorbing media to driving, technical work, strength movements that require concentration, or any task where divided attention creates risk.", "check_in": "Did the pairing make the useful activity easier to start or repeat, and did the reward stay enjoyable without damaging the quality or safety of the task?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "do-it", "title": "Do It" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "habits-consistency", "title": "Habits & Consistency" }, { "id": "task-initiation", "title": "Task Initiation" }, { "id": "movement", "title": "Movement" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "do-it" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.09.003", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-11" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 51, "selection_score": 85, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:visible-progress-monitoring", "protocol_id": "brali:visible-progress-monitoring", "slug": "visible-progress-monitoring", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/visible-progress-monitoring/", "title": "Make Goal Progress Visible Instead of Guessing", "description": "For a goal you are actively pursuing, choose one observable progress signal, record it at useful checkpoints, compare it with the target, and use the result to adjust the next action. Monitoring helps when it informs action; more tracking is not automatically better.", "action": "Choose one goal where feedback can still change what you do. Pick one observable indicator that is close to the real outcome or behavior you care about. Record it at checkpoints that match the task, compare it with the target or previous checkpoint, and decide one adjustment. Prefer a small trace you will actually use over a dashboard full of decorative metrics.", "check_in": "What changed in the progress signal, and what is the one next action that follows from that information?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "do-it", "title": "Do It" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" }, { "id": "planning-prioritization", "title": "Planning & Prioritization" }, { "id": "habits-consistency", "title": "Habits & Consistency" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "do-it" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000025", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-11" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 55, "selection_score": 84, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:walking-meeting-assistant", "protocol_id": "brali:walking-meeting-assistant", "slug": "walking-meeting-assistant", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/walking-meeting-assistant/", "title": "Turn a Screen-Free Meeting Into a Walking Meeting", "description": "Use a walking meeting to replace part of a long sitting block when the conversation does not require a screen. Evidence supports the movement break, not a special meeting effect.", "action": "When a meeting is mostly listening and talking, replace some of that sitting with an easy walk if the route, weather, privacy and meeting format make it safe. Keep screen-heavy or safety-critical conversations seated. Capture decisions before you finish.", "check_in": "Did I replace a sitting block with walking without making the meeting worse? Was the route safe and the conversation easy enough to follow? Would I use this format again for this kind of meeting?", "life_area": { "slug": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-healthy", "title": "Be Healthy" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "health-basics", "title": "Everyday Health Basics" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "health-energy", "growth_zone_slug": "be-healthy" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwag079", "reviewed_at": "2026-09-08" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 60, "selection_score": 81, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=1" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:woop-goal-planner", "protocol_id": "brali:woop-goal-planner", "slug": "woop-goal-planner", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/woop-goal-planner/", "title": "Use WOOP to Turn a Wish Into an If-Then Plan", "description": "Use a Wish, desired Outcome, likely internal Obstacle, and a concrete if-then Plan to make one meaningful goal easier to act on. Treat the method as a self-regulation tool, not a guarantee of goal achievement.", "action": "Choose one meaningful and reasonably feasible wish. Describe the outcome you want, identify an internal obstacle that could derail you, then write: If I notice this obstacle, then I will take this specific action. Try the plan in real life and revise it if the cue or response is not useful.", "check_in": "Did the obstacle actually appear, did my if-then response help me act, and what should I keep or change next time?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "future-builder", "title": "Future Builder" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "future-builder" } }, "evidence": { "status": "reviewed", "source_recorded": true, "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.565202", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 80, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": true, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "source-reviewed", "source-linked", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 8, "selection_score": 980, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:10-minute-language-microsprints", "protocol_id": "brali:10-minute-language-microsprints", "slug": "10-minute-language-microsprints", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/10-minute-language-microsprints/", "title": "Practice One Small Language Skill for a Short Session", "description": "Use a short study session to practice one narrow language skill such as recalling a few words, listening to a short clip, or speaking a brief response. Ten minutes is a convenient starting point, not a required dose.", "action": "Pick one narrow language task, such as reviewing a few phrases, listening to a short clip, reading a small passage, or recording a brief spoken answer. Practice for a short session and finish with one note about what to revisit next.", "check_in": "What did I practice, what could I recall or understand without help, and what is the next small thing worth repeating?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "language", "title": "Language" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "language-learning", "title": "Language Learning" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "language" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 15, "selection_score": 950, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:2-minute-desk-tidy-timer", "protocol_id": "brali:2-minute-desk-tidy-timer", "slug": "2-minute-desk-tidy-timer", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/2-minute-desk-tidy-timer/", "title": "Do a Short Desk Reset", "description": "Set a timer for 2 minutes and tidy up your workspace. Put away unnecessary items and clear some space for your tasks.", "action": "Set a short timer and tidy one small part of your workspace. Make only obvious moves, then stop before tidying turns into a larger task.", "check_in": "Is the workspace easier to use now, and did I stop before tidying became a new form of procrastination?", "life_area": { "slug": "work-money-strategy", "title": "Work, Money & Strategy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "work", "title": "Work" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" }, { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "workspace", "title": "Workspace" }, { "id": "task-initiation", "title": "Task Initiation" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "work-money-strategy", "growth_zone_slug": "work" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 12, "selection_score": 950, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:25-minute-pomodoro-focus-sprints", "protocol_id": "brali:25-minute-pomodoro-focus-sprints", "slug": "25-minute-pomodoro-focus-sprints", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/25-minute-pomodoro-focus-sprints/", "title": "Work in Focused 25-Minute Intervals (pomodoros) Followed by a 5-Minute Break", "description": "Work in focused 25-minute intervals (Pomodoros) followed by a 5-minute break. After four Pomodoros, take a longer break.", "action": "Pick one concrete outcome, work on it for one 25-minute focus block, take a short break, and then decide whether another block is useful. Treat 25 minutes as a starting setting, not a scientifically optimal duration.", "check_in": "Did I work on the intended outcome? What interrupted me, and should the next focus block be shorter, the same, or longer?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "future-builder", "title": "Future Builder" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "future-builder" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "start-here-anchor", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 1, "selection_score": 1050, "selection_reason": "manual-start-here-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:3-3-3-workday-planner", "protocol_id": "brali:3-3-3-workday-planner", "slug": "3-3-3-workday-planner", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/3-3-3-workday-planner/", "title": "Plan Your Workday in Three Simple Blocks", "description": "Split the day into a few broad work blocks and choose a small set of clear outcomes for each. Use three blocks and up to three tasks per block as a template, not a rule.", "action": "Divide the workday into up to three broad blocks. Give each block one to three clear outcomes that fit the time you actually have. Replan when meetings, urgent work, or delays change the day.", "check_in": "Did the blocks help me choose what mattered, and was any block overloaded, too vague, or too rigid?", "life_area": { "slug": "work-money-strategy", "title": "Work, Money & Strategy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "work", "title": "Work" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "work-money-strategy", "growth_zone_slug": "work" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 9, "selection_score": 950, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:30-min-eye-break-tracker", "protocol_id": "brali:30-min-eye-break-tracker", "slug": "30-min-eye-break-tracker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/30-min-eye-break-tracker/", "title": "Screen Break Checkpoint", "description": "Use a simple checkpoint during screen-heavy work: look away, change posture, and decide whether the next block still deserves your attention.", "action": "At a natural breakpoint in a long screen session, look away from the display, relax your posture, and name the next task before returning.", "check_in": "Did the pause make the next action clearer, or did it reveal that you should stop, switch, or rest?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "avoid-errors", "title": "Avoid Errors" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" }, { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "digital-attention", "title": "Digital Attention" }, { "id": "error-prevention", "title": "Error Prevention" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "avoid-errors" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 74, "selection_score": 55, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:30-minute-deadline-sprints", "protocol_id": "brali:30-minute-deadline-sprints", "slug": "30-minute-deadline-sprints", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/30-minute-deadline-sprints/", "title": "Use a Short Timebox for a Rough First Pass", "description": "Give a low-risk task a shorter-than-usual timebox, define what a useful first pass must contain, and reduce scope instead of pretending you can preserve everything by working faster.", "action": "Pick a low-risk task where an imperfect first pass is useful. Set a short timebox, define the minimum useful output, and decide what you will leave for later. Stop or reassess when the timebox ends.", "check_in": "Did the timebox help me make useful scope decisions, and what should be improved before this work is actually finished or shared?", "life_area": { "slug": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-creative", "title": "Be Creative" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "task-initiation", "title": "Task Initiation" }, { "id": "planning-prioritization", "title": "Planning & Prioritization" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "creativity-expression", "growth_zone_slug": "be-creative" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 10, "selection_score": 950, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:5-whys-goal-clarity", "protocol_id": "brali:5-whys-goal-clarity", "slug": "5-whys-goal-clarity", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/5-whys-goal-clarity/", "title": "Ask Why Until a Goal Becomes Clearer", "description": "Use repeated why questions to examine what is behind a goal, then turn the useful insight into a next step. Five questions are a prompt, not a requirement or a guarantee of finding one root cause.", "action": "Write one goal or problem, ask why it matters, and continue asking why while each answer adds something useful. Stop when the answers become repetitive, speculative, or split into different causes. Then choose one next step or one assumption to check.", "check_in": "Did the questions reveal a useful reason, assumption, or constraint, and what will I do or verify next?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "future-builder", "title": "Future Builder" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "future-builder" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 17, "selection_score": 950, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:5w1h-communication-checklist", "protocol_id": "brali:5w1h-communication-checklist", "slug": "5w1h-communication-checklist", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/5w1h-communication-checklist/", "title": "Check Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How", "description": "Before an important operational message, check whether the reader has the people, action, place, timing, reason, and next-step details they actually need.", "action": "Review an important operational message using six questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Add only the missing details the reader needs to act, then send the shortest version that is still clear.", "check_in": "Could the reader act without guessing, and did I include any detail that was unnecessary or sensitive?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "talk-smart", "title": "Talk Smart" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "talk-smart" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 16, "selection_score": 950, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:90-30-focus-rest-schedule", "protocol_id": "brali:90-30-focus-rest-schedule", "slug": "90-30-focus-rest-schedule", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/90-30-focus-rest-schedule/", "title": "Alternate Focused Work With Real Breaks", "description": "Use a protected focus block followed by a real break, then adjust the length to your task, energy, and schedule instead of treating 90/30 as a biological rule.", "action": "Choose one important task, protect a focus block from avoidable interruptions, then step away for a real break. Adjust both periods to your workload and energy rather than forcing a fixed 90/30 schedule.", "check_in": "Was the focus block long enough to make progress, did the break actually feel like a break, and what duration would fit the next cycle better?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "antifragility", "title": "Antifragility" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "health-energy", "title": "Health & Energy" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "attention-focus", "title": "Attention & Focus" }, { "id": "recovery-energy", "title": "Recovery & Energy" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "antifragility", "title": "Antifragility" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "antifragility" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 11, "selection_score": 950, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ab-test-learning-loop", "protocol_id": "brali:ab-test-learning-loop", "slug": "ab-test-learning-loop", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ab-test-learning-loop/", "title": "Compare Two Approaches and Learn From the Result", "description": "When a decision is reversible, compare two approaches around one clear question, keep the outcome you care about visible, and avoid treating a tiny informal comparison as statistical proof.", "action": "Choose one reversible decision, define what you want to learn, compare two approaches as fairly as you can, and record the outcome before deciding what to try next. Use proper experimental design when the result needs statistical confidence.", "check_in": "What changed between the two approaches, what outcome did I observe, and is the evidence strong enough to act or only strong enough to suggest another test?", "life_area": { "slug": "work-money-strategy", "title": "Work, Money & Strategy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "marketing", "title": "Marketing" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "problem-solving", "title": "Problem Solving" }, { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" }, { "id": "data-literacy", "title": "Data Literacy" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "work-money-strategy", "growth_zone_slug": "marketing" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 18, "selection_score": 950, "selection_reason": "gold-20-retrieval-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:achieve-multiple-goals-at-once", "protocol_id": "brali:achieve-multiple-goals-at-once", "slug": "achieve-multiple-goals-at-once", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/achieve-multiple-goals-at-once/", "title": "One Move, Several Benefits", "description": "Look for one concrete action that advances two compatible priorities, then check that combining them does not make the action vague or overloaded.", "action": "Name two priorities, brainstorm one concrete action that can serve both, and reject the combination if it makes either priority weaker or unclear.", "check_in": "Did combining the priorities simplify the plan, or did it create a compromised task that serves neither one well?", "life_area": { "slug": "work-money-strategy", "title": "Work, Money & Strategy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "grandmaster", "title": "Grandmaster" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "planning-prioritization", "title": "Planning & Prioritization" }, { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "chess", "title": "Chess" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "work-money-strategy", "growth_zone_slug": "grandmaster" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 75, "selection_score": 55, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=2; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:active-listening-exercises", "protocol_id": "brali:active-listening-exercises", "slug": "active-listening-exercises", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/active-listening-exercises/", "title": "Do Active Listening Exercises", "description": "Practice active listening by summarizing and repeating back what the other person has said to confirm understanding.", "action": "In one conversation, wait until the other person finishes a thought, paraphrase the main point in your own words, invite correction, and ask one open question before offering advice or changing the topic.", "check_in": "Did I summarize before responding? Was my summary accepted or corrected, and what did the correction teach me?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "relationships", "title": "Relationships" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "relationships", "title": "Relationships" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "relationships" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "start-here-anchor", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 5, "selection_score": 1050, "selection_reason": "manual-start-here-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:active-listening-meeting-notes", "protocol_id": "brali:active-listening-meeting-notes", "slug": "active-listening-meeting-notes", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/active-listening-meeting-notes/", "title": "Stay Sharp: - Take Notes: Write Down Key Points from the Person Speaking Before", "description": "To stay sharp: - Take notes: Write down key points from the person speaking before you. - Breathe and listen: Avoid rehearsing your own response while someone else is speaking. - Repeat mentally: After someone speaks, quickly repeat their main point in your head. Example: In a team meeting, note what the person before you says and reference it when it’s your turn.", "action": "To stay sharp: - Take notes: Write down key points from the person speaking before you. - Breathe and listen: Avoid rehearsing your own response while someone else is speaking. - Repeat mentally: After someone speaks, quickly repeat their main point in your head. Example: In a team meeting, note what the person before you says and reference it when it’s your turn.", "check_in": "Check in when you stay present during group conversations and recall the last speaker's points.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 76, "selection_score": 55, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ad-astra-per-aspera-motivation-tracker", "protocol_id": "brali:ad-astra-per-aspera-motivation-tracker", "slug": "ad-astra-per-aspera-motivation-tracker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ad-astra-per-aspera-motivation-tracker/", "title": "Use a Short Phrase to Choose the Next Step", "description": "Use a brief phrase as a cue to acknowledge a difficult moment and choose one small, controllable action. The phrase is a reminder, not a prediction about how the situation will end.", "action": "When you feel stuck, pause and repeat a short phrase once. Name what is difficult in plain language, then choose one action that is small enough to begin now. Skip the phrase if it feels hollow, pressuring or unrelated to the real problem.", "check_in": "What was difficult, what action did I choose, and did the phrase help me begin or should I use a different cue next time?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "phrases", "title": "Phrases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "task-initiation", "title": "Task Initiation" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "phrases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 87, "selection_score": 53, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=2; topic-bonus=1" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:affirmation-habit-tracker", "protocol_id": "brali:affirmation-habit-tracker", "slug": "affirmation-habit-tracker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/affirmation-habit-tracker/", "title": "Replace grand claims with a grounded statement and one next action.", "description": "Turn a vague positive statement into words you can presently stand behind, connect it to one action under your control, and revise the statement when it becomes false, empty, or unhelpful.", "action": "Write the positive statement you are tempted to use, underline the part that feels exaggerated or outside your control, replace it with language you can currently stand behind, attach one concrete action that would be consistent with the statement, and review the wording after you act.", "check_in": "Can I honestly endorse this statement now, what action does it point to, and should I keep, narrow, or replace the wording after seeing what I actually did?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-positive", "title": "Be Positive" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "mood-wellbeing", "title": "Mood & Wellbeing" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "be-positive" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 88, "selection_score": 53, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-conversation-rehearsal", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-conversation-rehearsal", "slug": "ai-conversation-rehearsal", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-conversation-rehearsal/", "title": "Rehearse a Difficult Conversation with AI Before the Real One", "description": "Before a difficult but ordinary conversation, use AI to role-play several plausible reactions, practise a concise opening, and identify points where you may become unclear or defensive. Treat the simulation as rehearsal, not as a model of the other person's mind.", "action": "State the goal, your opening, and relevant context without unnecessary private detail. Ask AI to play a neutral, skeptical, and confused counterpart. Practise responding with facts, boundaries, and questions. Write one shorter opening after the rehearsal and use that in the real conversation if it still fits.", "check_in": "Am I better prepared to listen and respond, or did I start treating the simulated person's reaction as a prediction?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "difficult-conversations", "title": "Difficult Conversations" }, { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 77, "selection_score": 55, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-premortem-risk-planner", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-premortem-risk-planner", "slug": "ai-premortem-risk-planner", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-premortem-risk-planner/", "title": "AI-Assisted Premortem", "description": "Use an AI model as a brainstorming partner for possible failure modes, then verify important risks against the real plan before choosing mitigations.", "action": "Describe the plan without sensitive information, ask an AI for plausible ways it could fail, group the suggestions, verify the important ones yourself, and choose mitigations only for risks that survive the check.", "check_in": "Which risks were genuinely relevant after verification, and which model suggestions were generic, impossible, or based on missing context?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "thinking", "title": "Thinking" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "error-prevention", "title": "Error Prevention" }, { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" }, { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "thinking" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 83, "selection_score": 54, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-rubric-critique", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-rubric-critique", "slug": "ai-rubric-critique", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-rubric-critique/", "title": "Give AI a Rubric and Ask for Specific Critique", "description": "For a draft you own, give AI the purpose and a short rubric, ask it to point to specific places that miss the criteria, then decide which suggestions actually improve the work. Use critique as input, not as an automatic rewrite command.", "action": "Write three to six criteria that describe a good result. Give the model the draft and rubric, ask for evidence from the draft for each criticism, and request no rewrite on the first pass. Triage the feedback, then make the changes you agree with.", "check_in": "Did the critique point to observable gaps in the draft, or mostly produce generic advice I could paste onto any text?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "revision-feedback", "title": "Revision & Feedback" }, { "id": "writing", "title": "Writing" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 89, "selection_score": 53, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-structured-extraction-check", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-structured-extraction-check", "slug": "ai-structured-extraction-check", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-structured-extraction-check/", "title": "Extract a Table with AI, Then Sample-Check the Rows", "description": "For repeated unstructured text you are allowed to process, ask AI to extract a fixed schema, include the source span for each row, and flag uncertainty. Then sample-check rows and fully verify fields that drive money, access, compliance, or other high-cost actions.", "action": "Define the columns and allowed values before extraction. Ask the model to return null rather than guess, preserve a source snippet or locator for each row, and flag ambiguous cases. Check a random sample plus all high-impact rows against the original text before using the result downstream.", "check_in": "Do I know the observed extraction error rate well enough for the consequence of the next step?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "information-management", "title": "Information Management" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" }, { "id": "qa", "title": "Quality Assurance" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 90, "selection_score": 53, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-test-case-generator", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-test-case-generator", "slug": "ai-test-case-generator", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-test-case-generator/", "title": "Ask AI for Failure Cases Before You Ship", "description": "Give AI a feature, process, calculation, message, or workflow and ask for edge cases and failure modes. Treat the output as a candidate list, deduplicate it, verify relevance, and convert the useful cases into executable tests or checklist items.", "action": "Describe the intended behavior, constraints, known happy path, and expensive failures. Ask for boundary cases, invalid inputs, state transitions, concurrency or timing issues where relevant, and user misunderstandings. Remove duplicates, verify each candidate against the real system, and write tests for the cases worth keeping.", "check_in": "Did AI expose a failure I had not covered, and did I turn that idea into a check rather than merely admire the list?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "error-prevention", "title": "Error Prevention" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" }, { "id": "qa", "title": "Quality Assurance" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 91, "selection_score": 53, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:analogy-studio", "protocol_id": "brali:analogy-studio", "slug": "analogy-studio", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/analogy-studio/", "title": "Explain One Idea with an Analogy and Its Limit", "description": "Compare an unfamiliar idea with something familiar, state the matching point, name where the comparison stops and ask the listener to restate the idea.", "action": "Write the idea you need to explain. Choose a familiar comparison, map only the important relationship, add one boundary sentence and ask the listener to restate the original idea. Revise the analogy if the restatement keeps the wrong detail.", "check_in": "Could the listener restate the intended idea, and which part of the analogy clarified or distorted it?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "nlp", "title": "NLP" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" }, { "id": "creative-problem-solving", "title": "Creative Problem Solving" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "nlp" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 98, "selection_score": 52, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=2" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ancestral-torch-resilience-tracker", "protocol_id": "brali:ancestral-torch-resilience-tracker", "slug": "ancestral-torch-resilience-tracker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ancestral-torch-resilience-tracker/", "title": "Short Resilience Reminder", "description": "Create a short phrase that acknowledges difficulty without pretending it is easy, then points back to one action you can still control.", "action": "Write one sentence in the form: This is difficult, and the next thing I can control is ___. Keep it specific to the current situation.", "check_in": "Did the phrase lead to a concrete action, or did it become empty motivation that you repeated without changing anything?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "phrases", "title": "Phrases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "stress-regulation", "title": "Stress Regulation" }, { "id": "psychological-flexibility", "title": "Psychological Flexibility" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "phrases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 62, "selection_score": 66, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=10; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:anticipate-sudden-trend-shifts", "protocol_id": "brali:anticipate-sudden-trend-shifts", "slug": "anticipate-sudden-trend-shifts", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/anticipate-sudden-trend-shifts/", "title": "Expect the Unexpected", "description": "When predicting trends: - Ask yourself: \"Could there be sudden changes or breaks in this trend?\" - Prepare for shifts: Always consider outliers and unexpected events in planning. - Look for weak signals: Early signs of change can help you adapt quickly. Example: A stock steadily rising? Plan for a downturn just as much as for continued growth.", "action": "When predicting trends: - Ask yourself: \"Could there be sudden changes or breaks in this trend?\" - Prepare for shifts: Always consider outliers and unexpected events in planning. - Look for weak signals: Early signs of change can help you adapt quickly. Example: A stock steadily rising? Plan for a downturn just as much as for continued growth.", "check_in": "Check in when you account for potential trend breaks in your planning.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 84, "selection_score": 54, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ask-better-interview-questions", "protocol_id": "brali:ask-better-interview-questions", "slug": "ask-better-interview-questions", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ask-better-interview-questions/", "title": "Run a Short, Concrete Information Interview", "description": "Ask permission, focus on one recent event, follow the sequence step by step and separate remembered facts, estimates and interpretation.", "action": "Explain why you are asking and get permission. Ask the person to walk through the most recent relevant example. Use one question at a time about sequence, context, tools, decisions and uncertainty. Summarize what you heard and invite correction.", "check_in": "What concrete sequence did I learn, what remains an estimate or interpretation, and what did the person correct?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "as-detective", "title": "As Detective" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "listening", "title": "Listening" }, { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "detective", "title": "Detective" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "as-detective" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 72, "selection_score": 56, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ask-for-feedback-tracker", "protocol_id": "brali:ask-for-feedback-tracker", "slug": "ask-for-feedback-tracker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ask-for-feedback-tracker/", "title": "Ask for Feedback on One Specific Decision", "description": "Give the reviewer context, ask one focused question, make the reply easy and decide what you will accept, test, discuss, defer or ignore.", "action": "State the intended outcome and the current decision. Ask one focused question such as what is unclear, what assumption looks wrong or what should change first. Choose a reviewer who can judge that question, then record what you will accept, test, discuss, defer or ignore.", "check_in": "What did I ask, what did the reviewer actually say, and what decision or test changed because of it?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "thinking", "title": "Thinking" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "metacognition", "title": "Metacognition" }, { "id": "revision-feedback", "title": "Revision & Feedback" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "thinking" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 99, "selection_score": 52, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=2" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:assumed-similarity-bias-check", "protocol_id": "brali:assumed-similarity-bias-check", "slug": "assumed-similarity-bias-check", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/assumed-similarity-bias-check/", "title": "Challenge Assumed Similarities", "description": "When interacting with others: - Ask: \"What’s unique about this person’s perspective or experience?\" - Listen actively: Avoid projecting your own traits or beliefs onto them. - Reflect: Notice when you assume similarities without evidence and correct yourself. Example: Don’t assume a coworker has the same work style as you; ask about their preferences and needs.", "action": "When interacting with others: - Ask: \"What’s unique about this person’s perspective or experience?\" - Listen actively: Avoid projecting your own traits or beliefs onto them. - Reflect: Notice when you assume similarities without evidence and correct yourself. Example: Don’t assume a coworker has the same work style as you; ask about their preferences and needs.", "check_in": "Check in when you actively avoid assuming someone is just like you.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 92, "selection_score": 53, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:attention-to-detail-trainer", "protocol_id": "brali:attention-to-detail-trainer", "slug": "attention-to-detail-trainer", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/attention-to-detail-trainer/", "title": "Run a Detail Check Before You Ship", "description": "Inspect a concrete artifact against a small checklist, run a second pass from a different angle, log anomalies, and improve the checklist from real misses rather than training vague hypervigilance.", "action": "Choose an artifact or environment where errors matter, write a short checklist from known failure modes, inspect once for completeness and once from a different perspective such as data consistency or user flow, record anomalies, fix them, and update the checklist when a new recurring miss appears.", "check_in": "What defect or ambiguity did the check find, which checklist item caught it, and what recurring miss should change the next review?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "as-detective", "title": "As Detective" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "error-prevention", "title": "Error Prevention" }, { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "detective", "title": "Detective" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "as-detective" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 100, "selection_score": 52, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=2" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:automate-routine-data-reports", "protocol_id": "brali:automate-routine-data-reports", "slug": "automate-routine-data-reports", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/automate-routine-data-reports/", "title": "Automate a Routine Report with Validation and Fallback", "description": "Automate a stable reporting workflow only after defining source ownership, transformations, validation rules, freshness, failure handling, and a manual fallback.", "action": "Map the report consumer, source data, transformations and delivery step. Define validation rules for schema, completeness, freshness and key totals. Build a small automated path with logging and a visible failure state, keep a manual fallback, and stop publication when validation fails.", "check_in": "Did the automated report use the expected source, pass validation, arrive on time, and fail visibly when an assumption broke?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "data", "title": "Data" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "data-literacy", "title": "Data Literacy" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "data" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 78, "selection_score": 55, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:automatic-paycheck-to-savings", "protocol_id": "brali:automatic-paycheck-to-savings", "slug": "automatic-paycheck-to-savings", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/automatic-paycheck-to-savings/", "title": "Automatic Savings Rule", "description": "If essential obligations are covered, automate a modest transfer to savings and review whether the amount remains comfortable. This is general educational guidance, not individualized financial advice.", "action": "Review upcoming essential expenses, choose a small transfer amount you can change or cancel, schedule it after income arrives, and check that it does not create a shortfall.", "check_in": "Did the automation make saving easier without making bills, debt payments, or necessary spending harder to cover?", "life_area": { "slug": "work-money-strategy", "title": "Work, Money & Strategy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "money", "title": "Money" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "personal-finance", "title": "Personal Finance" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "work-money-strategy", "growth_zone_slug": "money" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 64, "selection_score": 64, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=8; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:avoid-anthropocentric-bias", "protocol_id": "brali:avoid-anthropocentric-bias", "slug": "avoid-anthropocentric-bias", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/avoid-anthropocentric-bias/", "title": "Separate Observation from Human-Like Interpretation", "description": "Describe what a non-human animal, plant, machine or model did before assigning a human motive. Add a system-specific alternative and state what remains uncertain.", "action": "Choose one behavior or output. Record only what you could point to or reproduce. Write the human-like interpretation you first considered, then add a system-specific alternative and one low-risk way to check between them. Keep uncertainty visible when you cannot check.", "check_in": "What did I directly observe, what interpretation did I add, and what alternative or check changed my next action?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 93, "selection_score": 53, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:avoid-gamblers-fallacy-trust-the-odds", "protocol_id": "brali:avoid-gamblers-fallacy-trust-the-odds", "slug": "avoid-gamblers-fallacy-trust-the-odds", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/avoid-gamblers-fallacy-trust-the-odds/", "title": "Check Whether a Streak Changes the Next Event", "description": "Before acting on a streak, identify whether earlier outcomes can change the next event and use a pre-defined decision rule rather than a story about what is due.", "action": "Describe the next event and the recent streak. Ask what carries information or state from earlier outcomes into the next one. If there is no connection, ignore the streak and use the same probability or decision rule. If a connection may exist, identify the relevant state and gather that information. Use a pre-defined stop rule for repeated high-cost decisions.", "check_in": "What connection did I identify between past and next events, and did my action follow the rule or merely the feeling that an outcome was due?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" }, { "id": "data-literacy", "title": "Data Literacy" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 85, "selection_score": 54, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:avoid-selection-bias-in-analysis", "protocol_id": "brali:avoid-selection-bias-in-analysis", "slug": "avoid-selection-bias-in-analysis", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/avoid-selection-bias-in-analysis/", "title": "Write the Inclusion Rule Before Generalizing", "description": "Record who or what entered an analysis, who was excluded and how the conclusion changes when missing cases are considered.", "action": "State the question and population you want to understand. Record how cases entered the analysis, which cases were excluded or missing and whether selection depends on the outcome. Compare the conclusion with a broader view or label it as applying only to the selected group. Write what additional data would change the conclusion.", "check_in": "Who was included, who was missing, and is my conclusion limited to the selected group or supported beyond it?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" }, { "id": "data-literacy", "title": "Data Literacy" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 94, "selection_score": 53, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:backfire-effect-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:backfire-effect-coach", "slug": "backfire-effect-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/backfire-effect-coach/", "title": "Pause a Heated Disagreement and Test One Claim", "description": "Slow down a defensive exchange, restate the other person's claim, identify what could change either view and choose one concrete check or a respectful stopping point.", "action": "Notice that you are defending rather than examining. Pause before replying. Restate the other person's claim in words they accept, then state your own position and uncertainty. Ask what information would change either view. Choose one concrete check, or stop when the exchange is no longer productive or safe.", "check_in": "What claim did we clarify, what could change either view, and did we choose a check, revise a position or stop respectfully?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" }, { "id": "conflict-repair", "title": "Conflict & Repair" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 79, "selection_score": 55, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:biomimicry-creative-problem-solving", "protocol_id": "brali:biomimicry-creative-problem-solving", "slug": "biomimicry-creative-problem-solving", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/biomimicry-creative-problem-solving/", "title": "Translate a Problem into a Nature-Inspired Design Principle", "description": "Describe the function a solution must perform, inspect a biological example, extract a transferable principle and test one safe application without copying the organism literally.", "action": "State what the solution must do without naming the current solution. Choose a biological example from a reliable description. Separate the observed structure or process from the metaphor. Write one transferable principle, generate several applications and test the smallest reversible option within safety and operational constraints.", "check_in": "What function did I study, what principle did I extract, and what did the small test reveal about its usefulness or limit?", "life_area": { "slug": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-creative", "title": "Be Creative" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "creative-problem-solving", "title": "Creative Problem Solving" }, { "id": "idea-generation", "title": "Idea Generation" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "creativity-expression", "growth_zone_slug": "be-creative" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 61, "selection_score": 69, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=14; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:bold-brainstorm-kickoff", "protocol_id": "brali:bold-brainstorm-kickoff", "slug": "bold-brainstorm-kickoff", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/bold-brainstorm-kickoff/", "title": "Use an Extreme Seed, Then Return to Reality", "description": "Start an idea session with a deliberately unrealistic seed, explore its consequences without defending it and then translate useful fragments back into real constraints.", "action": "State the real problem. Choose an extreme seed that changes one constraint, customer, resource or rule. During a short generation round, list consequences and variants without arguing with the seed. Remove the seed, restore actual constraints and choose one feasible fragment to test or develop.", "check_in": "Which useful fragment came from the extreme seed, and what real constraint or next test made it actionable?", "life_area": { "slug": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-creative", "title": "Be Creative" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "creative-problem-solving", "title": "Creative Problem Solving" }, { "id": "idea-generation", "title": "Idea Generation" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "creativity-expression", "growth_zone_slug": "be-creative" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 63, "selection_score": 66, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=12; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:brag-doc-wins-hub", "protocol_id": "brali:brag-doc-wins-hub", "slug": "brag-doc-wins-hub", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/brag-doc-wins-hub/", "title": "Keep a Work Wins Log You Can Reuse", "description": "Record completed work, solved problems, decisions, useful contributions and recoveries in a compact log so you can retrieve concrete examples for reviews, resumes, proposals, retrospectives and planning.", "action": "After a meaningful piece of work, add a short entry with the situation, your contribution, the concrete result or current state, and one or two tags. During a review, retrieve entries that match the purpose and verify any figures or claims before reusing them.", "check_in": "What changed, what did I contribute, what detail will I need later, and is the entry specific enough to reuse without exaggeration?", "life_area": { "slug": "work-money-strategy", "title": "Work, Money & Strategy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "grandmaster", "title": "Grandmaster" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" }, { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "information-management", "title": "Information Management" }, { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "chess", "title": "Chess" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "work-money-strategy", "growth_zone_slug": "grandmaster" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 70, "selection_score": 58, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=4; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:brainwriting-group-idea-generation", "protocol_id": "brali:brainwriting-group-idea-generation", "slug": "brainwriting-group-idea-generation", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/brainwriting-group-idea-generation/", "title": "In a Group, Write Down Ideas and Pass Them Around for Others to Build", "description": "In a group, write down ideas and pass them around for others to build on.", "action": "Give the group one clear question, let everyone write ideas silently, pass the ideas to another person to add or change them, and delay discussion until the group has built several options.", "check_in": "Did everyone get a chance to contribute before discussion? Which idea became more useful after another person built on it, and what should the group test next?", "life_area": { "slug": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-creative", "title": "Be Creative" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "idea-generation", "title": "Idea Generation" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "creativity-expression", "growth_zone_slug": "be-creative" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "start-here-anchor", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 6, "selection_score": 1050, "selection_reason": "manual-start-here-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:break-down-big-problems-triz", "protocol_id": "brali:break-down-big-problems-triz", "slug": "break-down-big-problems-triz", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/break-down-big-problems-triz/", "title": "Decompose a Hard Problem with TRIZ-Inspired Contradictions", "description": "Describe the unwanted result, expose the trade-off or contradiction, split the system into parts, and check a change that removes a constraint instead of merely optimizing around it.", "action": "State the unwanted outcome, map the main parts and interactions, write the trade-off as two requirements that appear to conflict, generate separation or redesign options, choose a reversible check, and record which assumption or constraint changed.", "check_in": "What contradiction did I expose, what separation or redesign did I check, and did it remove the conflict or only move it elsewhere?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "triz", "title": "TRIZ" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "problem-solving", "title": "Problem Solving" }, { "id": "creative-problem-solving", "title": "Creative Problem Solving" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "triz", "title": "TRIZ" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "triz" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 86, "selection_score": 54, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:build-your-support-network", "protocol_id": "brali:build-your-support-network", "slug": "build-your-support-network", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/build-your-support-network/", "title": "Build a Support Map Around Specific Needs", "description": "Map the kinds of support you sometimes need, identify appropriate people or communities for each kind, make specific requests that are easy to decline, and protect reciprocity and boundaries.", "action": "Write down one current need, decide what kind of help would actually be useful, identify a person or community that is appropriate for that request, ask specifically and make declining easy, respect the answer, and record whether you need a different resource or a different kind of help next time.", "check_in": "Was the request specific and appropriate, was the other person's boundary clear, and do I need to change the ask, the resource, or my own next action?", "life_area": { "slug": "work-money-strategy", "title": "Work, Money & Strategy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "insider", "title": "Insider" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "relationships", "title": "Relationships" }, { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "insider-fieldcraft", "title": "Fieldcraft" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "work-money-strategy", "growth_zone_slug": "insider" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 95, "selection_score": 53, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:chunk-complex-ideas-for-clarity", "protocol_id": "brali:chunk-complex-ideas-for-clarity", "slug": "chunk-complex-ideas-for-clarity", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/chunk-complex-ideas-for-clarity/", "title": "Organize Complex Information Around One Decision", "description": "Define the audience and decision, group related material into labeled parts, put the main path in a useful order, and move supporting detail into linked layers instead of either flattening everything or presenting every detail at once.", "action": "Name the primary audience and the decision or action they need to understand. Group related material by purpose, give each group a descriptive label, order the groups into a main path, and move supporting definitions, examples, calculations or source detail into a layer that remains easy to retrieve.", "check_in": "What does the audience need to decide or do, which groups form the main path, what belongs in supporting detail, and can a reader find that detail when needed?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "talk-smart", "title": "Talk Smart" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" }, { "id": "information-management", "title": "Information Management" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "talk-smart" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 66, "selection_score": 63, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=8; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:circles-of-control-planner", "protocol_id": "brali:circles-of-control-planner", "slug": "circles-of-control-planner", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/circles-of-control-planner/", "title": "Separate Outcomes From Actions You Can Control", "description": "Draw two circles; one for factors you can control and another for those you cannot. Set clear, achievable goals based on what’s within your control.", "action": "Write down one concern, separate the outcome from the actions you can take, convert anything you can influence into one concrete behavior, and choose the next useful action without pretending you control the final result.", "check_in": "What part of this situation was actually mine to act on, what remained outside my control, and did the sorting help me choose a clearer next step?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "stoicism", "title": "Stoicism" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" }, { "id": "stress-regulation", "title": "Stress Regulation" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "stoicism", "title": "Stoicism" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "stoicism" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "start-here-anchor", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 2, "selection_score": 1050, "selection_reason": "manual-start-here-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:clarity-ladder-analyzer", "protocol_id": "brali:clarity-ladder-analyzer", "slug": "clarity-ladder-analyzer", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/clarity-ladder-analyzer/", "title": "Connect a General Point to a Concrete Example", "description": "State the general point, add a concrete example or observable detail that belongs to it, connect the example back to the point, and remove specifics that do not help the audience understand the message or next action.", "action": "Write the main point in plain language, choose an example, observation, step or verified figure that illustrates it, explain the connection in one sentence, and remove details that do not change understanding or action. If you began with a detail, reverse the sequence by stating the broader point it supports.", "check_in": "What is the general point, which concrete detail makes it easier to understand, what does that detail show here, and which specifics can be removed without changing the meaning?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "talk-smart", "title": "Talk Smart" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" }, { "id": "writing", "title": "Writing" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "talk-smart" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 73, "selection_score": 56, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=4; topic-bonus=2" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:context-planner-for-writers", "protocol_id": "brali:context-planner-for-writers", "slug": "context-planner-for-writers", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/context-planner-for-writers/", "title": "Write a Context Brief Before Drafting", "description": "Before drafting, write a compact brief that identifies the primary reader, where the text will appear, what the reader should understand or do, which constraints apply, and what facts or sources must be verified.", "action": "Write the primary reader, publication surface, desired reader action or understanding, required tone or format constraints, facts that must be checked, and any detail that should be omitted for privacy, confidentiality or scope. Then build the outline from that brief.", "check_in": "Who is this for, where will it appear, what should the reader understand or do, and which constraint or fact must the draft respect?", "life_area": { "slug": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "writing", "title": "Writing" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" }, { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "writing", "title": "Writing" }, { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "creativity-expression", "growth_zone_slug": "writing" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 65, "selection_score": 64, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=10; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:contextual-language-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:contextual-language-coach", "slug": "contextual-language-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/contextual-language-coach/", "title": "Rehearse One Real Language Scenario", "description": "Choose a real low-risk interaction in the language you are learning, prepare the minimum useful phrases plus a repair phrase, rehearse likely turns, try the interaction when appropriate, and update the phrase set from what was difficult.", "action": "Define the scenario and desired outcome, write the core request or response, add likely follow-up phrases and one repair phrase for misunderstanding, rehearse both sides aloud, use the interaction when appropriate, and update the phrase set from the point where you hesitated or needed clarification.", "check_in": "Which scenario did I rehearse, where did the interaction become difficult, which phrase or listening cue should I add, and what can I reuse next time?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "language", "title": "Language" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "language-learning", "title": "Language Learning" }, { "id": "skill-learning", "title": "Skill Learning" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "language" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 80, "selection_score": 55, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:coot-ai-growth-journal", "protocol_id": "brali:coot-ai-growth-journal", "slug": "coot-ai-growth-journal", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/coot-ai-growth-journal/", "title": "Turn an AI Reflection into One Next Action", "description": "Give an AI assistant a concrete goal, current constraints, and the decision you need to make; ask for options, assumptions, and failure modes; verify factual claims; then choose one reversible next action yourself.", "action": "State one concrete goal or decision, provide the relevant constraints and what you already know, ask the AI for a small set of distinct options with assumptions and failure modes, challenge anything vague, verify factual claims that matter, choose one reversible next action yourself, and record what would cause you to change course.", "check_in": "What became clearer, which AI claim still needs verification, what action did I choose, and what new information would make me revise the decision?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "grow-fast", "title": "Grow fast" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "habits-consistency", "title": "Habits & Consistency" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "grow-fast" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 96, "selection_score": 53, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:create-win-win-outcomes", "protocol_id": "brali:create-win-win-outcomes", "slug": "create-win-win-outcomes", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/create-win-win-outcomes/", "title": "Shared-Value Option Map", "description": "Map what each side values, where constraints differ, and which exchanges could create value without pretending every conflict has a win-win solution.", "action": "List what each side wants, what each side can trade at relatively low cost, and two or three options that combine those differences. Then test the options with the other side.", "check_in": "Did the conversation uncover a real trade, or are the interests still incompatible enough that a clear boundary or no-deal option is better?", "life_area": { "slug": "work-money-strategy", "title": "Work, Money & Strategy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "game-theory", "title": "Game Theory" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "strategy", "title": "Strategy" }, { "id": "negotiation", "title": "Negotiation" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "game-theory", "title": "Game Theory" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "work-money-strategy", "growth_zone_slug": "game-theory" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 67, "selection_score": 62, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=6; topic-bonus=6" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:creativity-within-constraints", "protocol_id": "brali:creativity-within-constraints", "slug": "creativity-within-constraints", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/creativity-within-constraints/", "title": "Use One Constraint to Produce a Different Creative Draft", "description": "When open-ended exploration is producing more browsing than making, choose one reversible constraint on scope, tools, format, or time and use it to create a concrete alternative you can compare with the original direction.", "action": "Name the artifact and the part that feels too open, choose one constraint that does not violate the brief, create a reversible variant without adding new constraints midstream, compare the result with the original requirements, and keep only the useful difference.", "check_in": "What did I constrain, what changed in the artifact, and did the constraint reveal anything worth keeping?", "life_area": { "slug": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-creative", "title": "Be Creative" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "idea-generation", "title": "Idea Generation" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "creativity-expression", "growth_zone_slug": "be-creative" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 71, "selection_score": 58, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=6; topic-bonus=2" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ergonomic-workspace-assessment", "protocol_id": "brali:ergonomic-workspace-assessment", "slug": "ergonomic-workspace-assessment", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ergonomic-workspace-assessment/", "title": "Audit Workspace Friction Before Buying More Gear", "description": "Inspect where a workspace makes the actual task harder to see, reach, switch, connect, or reset; change one layout variable; and keep the change only when it removes friction without creating a new problem.", "action": "Choose one frequent task, walk through it slowly, note every unnecessary reach, obstruction, visibility issue, cable move, device swap, or reset, rank the friction points, change one reversible layout variable, use the task again, and keep or undo the change based on what became easier or harder.", "check_in": "Which step in the task had avoidable friction, what single workspace change did I make, and did it remove that friction without moving the problem somewhere else?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "as-architector", "title": "As Architector" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "workspace", "title": "Workspace" }, { "id": "environment-design", "title": "Environment Design" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "architecture", "title": "Architecture" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "as-architector" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 81, "selection_score": 55, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=5" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:leave-an-app-review", "protocol_id": "brali:leave-an-app-review", "slug": "leave-an-app-review", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/leave-an-app-review/", "title": "Leave Useful Feedback", "description": "Write feedback that separates what happened, why it mattered to you, and what change would make the experience better.", "action": "Describe one concrete thing that worked or failed, explain the effect it had on your task, and add one specific suggestion if you have one.", "check_in": "Could the recipient understand what happened and what might improve without guessing what you meant?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "grow-together", "title": "Grow Together" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" }, { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "revision-feedback", "title": "Revision & Feedback" }, { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "grow-together" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 69, "selection_score": 60, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=6; topic-bonus=4" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:oblique-strategies-prompt-cards", "protocol_id": "brali:oblique-strategies-prompt-cards", "slug": "oblique-strategies-prompt-cards", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/oblique-strategies-prompt-cards/", "title": "Use One Random Constraint to Break a Creative Stalemate", "description": "When familiar approaches keep producing the same result, draw or select one bounded prompt, create a reversible alternative for a few minutes, and keep only the part that improves the actual work.", "action": "Name the part of the work that feels stuck, select one prompt or constraint without hunting for the perfect one, create a separate reversible version under that constraint, stop after one useful pass, compare it with the original, and keep only the changes that improve the brief.", "check_in": "What constraint did I try, what changed in the artifact, and which part—if any—is worth carrying into the real version?", "life_area": { "slug": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-creative", "title": "Be Creative" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "idea-generation", "title": "Idea Generation" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "creativity-expression", "growth_zone_slug": "be-creative" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 82, "selection_score": 55, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=4; topic-bonus=1" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:process-of-elimination-tracker", "protocol_id": "brali:process-of-elimination-tracker", "slug": "process-of-elimination-tracker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/process-of-elimination-tracker/", "title": "Use Elimination Rules to Narrow a Decision", "description": "Define a few decision constraints, eliminate options that clearly fail them, then compare the smaller remaining set without pretending arbitrary thresholds are universal rules.", "action": "List the viable options, write two to four constraints that are genuinely relevant to this decision, eliminate only options that clearly fail a constraint, inspect what remains for missing information and trade-offs, then choose the next reversible test or decision step.", "check_in": "Which constraint removed an option, what uncertainty remains among the survivors, and what is the smallest next step that would improve the decision?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "as-detective", "title": "As Detective" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" }, { "id": "problem-solving", "title": "Problem Solving" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "detective", "title": "Detective" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "as-detective" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 97, "selection_score": 53, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=0; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:start-with-a-hypothesis", "protocol_id": "brali:start-with-a-hypothesis", "slug": "start-with-a-hypothesis", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/start-with-a-hypothesis/", "title": "When Faced with a Problem, Start by Making an Educated Guess About the Cause", "description": "When faced with a problem, start by making an educated guess about the cause. Write down your hypothesis and what you expect to happen if it’s true.", "action": "When a work problem is unclear, write one plausible explanation, state what you would expect to observe if it were true, run the smallest safe check that could change your mind, and update the hypothesis from the result.", "check_in": "What did I expect to observe, what actually happened, and what changed in my explanation after the test?", "life_area": { "slug": "work-money-strategy", "title": "Work, Money & Strategy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "work", "title": "Work" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "problem-solving", "title": "Problem Solving" }, { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "work-money-strategy", "growth_zone_slug": "work" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "start-here-anchor", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 7, "selection_score": 1050, "selection_reason": "manual-start-here-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:structure-writing-with-visuals", "protocol_id": "brali:structure-writing-with-visuals", "slug": "structure-writing-with-visuals", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/structure-writing-with-visuals/", "title": "Structure Dense Writing for Fast Navigation", "description": "Turn a dense draft into a navigable document by giving each section one job and choosing headings, tables, diagrams, or images according to the information the reader needs to inspect.", "action": "Name the reader's main task, read the current headings without the body, reorganize sections around that path, replace repeated comparisons with a table when rows share the same attributes, use a diagram for relationships or sequence, and keep images only when they show information that prose would make harder to inspect.", "check_in": "Can a reader scan the headings and understand the path, and does every visual element answer a question that the surrounding text does not answer as clearly?", "life_area": { "slug": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "writing", "title": "Writing" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "writing", "title": "Writing" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "creativity-expression", "growth_zone_slug": "writing" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 68, "selection_score": 61, "selection_reason": "quality-ranked; life-area-bonus=8; topic-bonus=3" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:weekly-theme-learning-sprints", "protocol_id": "brali:weekly-theme-learning-sprints", "slug": "weekly-theme-learning-sprints", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/weekly-theme-learning-sprints/", "title": "Spend Each Week Focused on a Single Theme", "description": "Spend each week focused on a single theme. Immerse yourself in everything related to that topic through reading, watching, and activities.", "action": "Choose one narrow learning theme for the week, define one visible result for Friday, and complete at least one small practice rep on each day you work on it.", "check_in": "Did I complete one practice rep? What was the main friction, and what should I change for the next rep?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "skill-sprint", "title": "Skill Sprint" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "skill-learning", "title": "Skill Learning" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "skill-sprint" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-18" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description", "start-here-anchor", "gold-20-candidate" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": true, "selection_rank": 4, "selection_score": 1050, "selection_reason": "manual-start-here-anchor" }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:10x-goal-sprints-tracker", "protocol_id": "brali:10x-goal-sprints-tracker", "slug": "10x-goal-sprints-tracker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/10x-goal-sprints-tracker/", "title": "Use a Stretch-Goal Sprint to Expose What Must Change", "description": "Choose an intentionally ambitious outcome, separate controllable levers from external constraints, test one reversible change, and review what the sprint actually teaches you.", "action": "Write one desired outcome and the constraints around it. List the levers you can actually change, choose one reversible experiment, define what you will observe, run the smallest useful version, and review whether the result changes your plan.", "check_in": "What assumption, constraint, or controllable lever did the sprint expose, and what should I keep, change, or stop next?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "future-builder", "title": "Future Builder" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "future-builder" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:478-breathing-technique-guide", "protocol_id": "brali:478-breathing-technique-guide", "slug": "478-breathing-technique-guide", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/478-breathing-technique-guide/", "title": "Comfortable Breathing Reset", "description": "Use a few comfortable, unforced breaths as a brief pause before deciding what to do next. Skip counts that create strain or dizziness.", "action": "Sit or stand comfortably, let your breathing slow without forcing a count, take a few easy breaths, and then return attention to one concrete next action.", "check_in": "Did the pause help you feel more settled and able to choose the next action? Stop if breathing feels uncomfortable or light-headed.", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "be-calm", "title": "Be Calm" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "stress-regulation", "title": "Stress Regulation" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "be-calm" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:7-breath-decision-pause", "protocol_id": "brali:7-breath-decision-pause", "slug": "7-breath-decision-pause", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/7-breath-decision-pause/", "title": "Use a Short Pause Before an Ordinary Decision", "description": "Pause briefly before a reactive low-risk choice, breathe comfortably or simply sit quietly, then decide whether to act, gather one missing fact, or defer deliberately.", "action": "Name the decision in one sentence. Take a few comfortable breaths or use a quiet pause; seven is only a memorable optional count. Ask what is known, what is missing, and whether the choice is reversible. Then act, gather one specific piece of information, or set a deliberate time to revisit it.", "check_in": "After the pause, did I act, identify one missing fact, or defer the decision intentionally—and what made that the appropriate next step?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "future-builder", "title": "Future Builder" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "future-builder" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:active-listening-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:active-listening-coach", "slug": "active-listening-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/active-listening-coach/", "title": "Use a Brief Summary to Check What You Heard", "description": "In an important conversation, delay your response long enough to capture the speaker's main point, summarize it in your own words, ask whether you understood correctly, and adjust before moving to advice or action.", "action": "Let the speaker finish the relevant thought, identify the main point and any stated constraint, summarize it briefly in your own words, ask whether you captured it correctly, update your understanding if they correct you, and only then move to your response or the next action.", "check_in": "What did I think the person meant, what did they correct or add, and did the final next step reflect the shared understanding?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "talk-smart", "title": "Talk Smart" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "talk-smart" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:adopt-new-tools-at-work", "protocol_id": "brali:adopt-new-tools-at-work", "slug": "adopt-new-tools-at-work", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/adopt-new-tools-at-work/", "title": "Test a New Work Tool on a Low-Risk Task", "description": "Pick one recurring work problem, try one tool on a noncritical task, compare the old and new workflow, then keep, adjust, or drop it based on what you observe.", "action": "Choose one recurring low-risk work task, note how you handle it now, try one new tool on a test or noncritical case, compare the result and friction, and decide whether to repeat, adjust, or stop.", "check_in": "What task did I test, what changed in the workflow, what friction appeared, and is the next step to keep, adjust, or drop the tool?", "life_area": { "slug": "work-money-strategy", "title": "Work, Money & Strategy" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "work", "title": "Work" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "work-money-strategy", "growth_zone_slug": "work" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-meeting-notes-to-actions", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-meeting-notes-to-actions", "slug": "ai-meeting-notes-to-actions", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-meeting-notes-to-actions/", "title": "Turn Meeting Notes into Actions, Then Reconcile Them", "description": "After a meeting, use AI to convert permitted notes or a transcript into decisions, actions, owners, dates, and open questions. Then reconcile the structured output against the original record before it becomes the team's memory.", "action": "Use only notes or transcripts you are allowed to process. Ask for five buckets: decisions, actions, owners, dates, and unresolved questions. Compare each populated field with the source, remove inferred commitments, and publish the checked version quickly while context is fresh.", "check_in": "Does every named owner and commitment come from the meeting, or did the model quietly turn a suggestion into an assignment?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-question-bank-builder", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-question-bank-builder", "slug": "ai-question-bank-builder", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-question-bank-builder/", "title": "Build an AI-Assisted Question Bank You Can Verify", "description": "Use AI to draft varied practice questions from material you already have, verify every answer against the source, and keep only questions that test the knowledge you actually need.", "action": "Choose a source you need to learn, ask AI for questions covering definitions, explanations, comparisons, application and error cases, verify every answer against the source, remove ambiguous or unsupported items, and practice from the cleaned bank.", "check_in": "Which questions exposed a gap, which answers could not be verified, and what should be corrected or added before the next practice round?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "skill-sprint", "title": "Skill Sprint" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "skill-learning", "title": "Skill Learning" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "skill-sprint" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-six-hats-facilitator", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-six-hats-facilitator", "slug": "ai-six-hats-facilitator", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-six-hats-facilitator/", "title": "Run a Six-Perspective Thinking Pass", "description": "Separate facts, reactions, risks, opportunities, alternatives, and process into distinct passes so a discussion can expose what is missing before choosing a next step.", "action": "Write one question. Make six short passes: facts and unknowns; reactions and preferences; risks and failure modes; benefits and opportunities; alternatives and experiments; then process and next step. Keep observations in their own pass so facts are not silently mixed with preferences or forecasts.", "check_in": "Which perspective added information the first discussion was missing, and what decision, question, or test follows from it?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "talk-smart", "title": "Talk Smart" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "talk-smart" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:ai-sop-from-examples", "protocol_id": "brali:ai-sop-from-examples", "slug": "ai-sop-from-examples", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/ai-sop-from-examples/", "title": "Turn Real Examples into a Draft SOP with AI", "description": "When a recurring task lives mostly in someone's head, give AI a few sanitized examples and ask for a draft procedure with inputs, steps, decisions, outputs, and exceptions. Validate the draft with the person who does the work and test it on a fresh case before treating it as process documentation.", "action": "Choose several representative examples and remove information you should not share. Ask AI to separate inputs, steps, decisions, outputs, exceptions, and unresolved questions. Review the draft with the actual operator, then run one new case using only the SOP and revise where the procedure breaks.", "check_in": "Could another competent person complete a fresh case from the checked SOP without relying on the hidden knowledge that created the examples?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "using-ai", "title": "Using AI" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "ai-collaboration", "title": "AI Collaboration" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "record-fields", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "using-ai" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-15" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:aida-message-optimizer", "protocol_id": "brali:aida-message-optimizer", "slug": "aida-message-optimizer", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/aida-message-optimizer/", "title": "Use AIDA as a Message Clarity Checklist", "description": "Check whether a message earns attention, makes the relevant point understandable, explains why it matters, and gives the reader a clear next action without treating AIDA as a persuasion guarantee.", "action": "Name the audience and desired next step, review the opening for relevance, remove information that does not help understanding, explain the concrete value or consequence honestly, and end with one clear action the reader can accept, decline, or ignore.", "check_in": "Can the reader quickly tell why this matters, what is being asked, and what they should do next without exaggerated claims or hidden pressure?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "talk-smart", "title": "Talk Smart" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "talk-smart" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:apply-80-20-principle", "protocol_id": "brali:apply-80-20-principle", "slug": "apply-80-20-principle", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/apply-80-20-principle/", "title": "Use 80/20 as a Prioritization Hypothesis", "description": "Rank the few inputs most likely to matter, test that ranking against observed results, and revise it instead of treating 80/20 as a law or exact forecast.", "action": "Define one outcome, list the inputs that could influence it, rank a small number by expected impact and cost, choose one to check, and compare the observed result with your initial ranking. Revise the ranking when the data disagrees.", "check_in": "Which input actually changed the outcome, what did it cost, and what should move up, down, or out of the priority list?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "future-builder", "title": "Future Builder" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "future-builder" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:attribution-bias-checker", "protocol_id": "brali:attribution-bias-checker", "slug": "attribution-bias-checker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/attribution-bias-checker/", "title": "See Beyond Personality", "description": "When analyzing behavior: - Ask for others: \"What situations might have influenced their actions?\" - Ask for yourself: \"Am I underestimating my own tendencies in this scenario?\" - Broaden the lens: Balance personality traits with situational influences for everyone. Example: If someone is late, consider traffic or unexpected delays, not just lack of punctuality.", "action": "When analyzing behavior: - Ask for others: \"What situations might have influenced their actions?\" - Ask for yourself: \"Am I underestimating my own tendencies in this scenario?\" - Broaden the lens: Balance personality traits with situational influences for everyone. Example: If someone is late, consider traffic or unexpected delays, not just lack of punctuality.", "check_in": "Check in when you evaluate behavior with both situational and personality factors in mind.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:attribution-bias-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:attribution-bias-coach", "slug": "attribution-bias-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/attribution-bias-coach/", "title": "Understand Context in Behavior", "description": "When judging behavior: - For others: Ask, \"What situations might have influenced their actions?\" - For yourself: Reflect, \"How much of this is about my choices versus circumstances?\" - Balance the view: Consider both personality and context for all parties. Example: A colleague misses a deadline—consider if external factors, not just laziness, played a role.", "action": "When judging behavior: - For others: Ask, \"What situations might have influenced their actions?\" - For yourself: Reflect, \"How much of this is about my choices versus circumstances?\" - Balance the view: Consider both personality and context for all parties. Example: A colleague misses a deadline—consider if external factors, not just laziness, played a role.", "check_in": "Check in when you evaluate behavior by considering both personality and situational factors.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:avoid-availability-heuristic-decisions", "protocol_id": "brali:avoid-availability-heuristic-decisions", "slug": "avoid-availability-heuristic-decisions", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/avoid-availability-heuristic-decisions/", "title": "Run a Missing-Evidence Check Before a Decision", "description": "When a vivid or recent example is dominating a decision, separate what is easy to recall from what is representative, then look for one missing denominator, counterexample, or relevant source.", "action": "Write the example or story currently driving the decision. Ask whether it is representative or simply vivid, recent, or personal. Look for one counterexample and, when the decision warrants it, one relevant denominator, base rate, or source. Update the decision only as far as the new information supports.", "check_in": "What information was easy to recall, what was missing, and did the additional evidence change the decision or only the level of uncertainty?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "thinking", "title": "Thinking" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "thinking" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:avoid-boundary-extension-errors", "protocol_id": "brali:avoid-boundary-extension-errors", "slug": "avoid-boundary-extension-errors", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/avoid-boundary-extension-errors/", "title": "Avoid Boundary Extension Errors", "description": "When recalling visuals: - Focus on details: Try to actively recall both the foreground and the background. - Verify: Revisit the original image or scene to compare your memory. - Practice recall: Test yourself on visual memories to sharpen your accuracy. Example: After seeing a photo, draw it from memory and then compare it to the original.", "action": "When recalling visuals: - Focus on details: Try to actively recall both the foreground and the background. - Verify: Revisit the original image or scene to compare your memory. - Practice recall: Test yourself on visual memories to sharpen your accuracy. Example: After seeing a photo, draw it from memory and then compare it to the original.", "check_in": "Check in when you actively verify your visual memory of an image or scene.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:avoid-contrast-effect", "protocol_id": "brali:avoid-contrast-effect", "slug": "avoid-contrast-effect", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/avoid-contrast-effect/", "title": "Judge Each Option Against the Same Criteria", "description": "Define the decision criteria before comparing options, assess each option on its own and only then compare the results.", "action": "State the outcome and non-negotiables. Review each option separately using the same short criteria and note pass, unclear or fail. Compare only after the separate assessments are complete. Recheck any choice that depends mainly on the previous option looking unusually good or bad.", "check_in": "Would I make the same choice if this option appeared first, and which criterion actually supports the decision?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:avoid-group-halo-bias-in-evaluations", "protocol_id": "brali:avoid-group-halo-bias-in-evaluations", "slug": "avoid-group-halo-bias-in-evaluations", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/avoid-group-halo-bias-in-evaluations/", "title": "See Beyond the Group Glow", "description": "When evaluating a group: - Pause and observe: \"Am I judging individuals or the group as a whole?\" - Focus on specifics: Look at individual contributions or qualities instead of the overall impression. - Compare individually: Evaluate members one by one to get a clearer picture. Example: Judging team performance? Break it down into individual efforts, not just the group’s vibe.", "action": "When evaluating a group: - Pause and observe: \"Am I judging individuals or the group as a whole?\" - Focus on specifics: Look at individual contributions or qualities instead of the overall impression. - Compare individually: Evaluate members one by one to get a clearer picture. Example: Judging team performance? Break it down into individual efforts, not just the group’s vibe.", "check_in": "Check in when you assess individuals within a group independently.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:avoid-groupthink-decision-checklist", "protocol_id": "brali:avoid-groupthink-decision-checklist", "slug": "avoid-groupthink-decision-checklist", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/avoid-groupthink-decision-checklist/", "title": "Think Off the Bandwagon", "description": "When considering a popular opinion: - Pause: Ask yourself, \"Do I agree because it’s popular or because it’s right?\" - Analyze: Break down the reasoning behind the opinion. Does it align with your values or evidence? - Decide independently: Make choices based on your evaluation, not peer pressure. Example: A team might agree on a subpar idea because everyone else does. Challenge it with better logic.", "action": "When considering a popular opinion: - Pause: Ask yourself, \"Do I agree because it’s popular or because it’s right?\" - Analyze: Break down the reasoning behind the opinion. Does it align with your values or evidence? - Decide independently: Make choices based on your evaluation, not peer pressure. Example: A team might agree on a subpar idea because everyone else does. Challenge it with better logic.", "check_in": "Check in when you resist following a crowd and evaluate decisions independently.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:batch-similar-tasks-planner", "protocol_id": "brali:batch-similar-tasks-planner", "slug": "batch-similar-tasks-planner", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/batch-similar-tasks-planner/", "title": "Batch Similar Tasks When Switching Is the Problem", "description": "Group comparable low-risk tasks when repeated setup is slowing the work, then compare the batch with your normal flow and stop batching when responsiveness suffers.", "action": "Pick one recurring task family, define what makes the tasks similar, collect a small batch, process it with the same setup, and record completed items, rework, waiting time, and missed urgency. Compare with the ordinary flow before expanding the batch.", "check_in": "Did batching remove repeated setup without adding unacceptable delay, rework, or missed urgent work?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "do-it", "title": "Do It" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "task-initiation", "title": "Task Initiation" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "do-it" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:belief-update-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:belief-update-coach", "slug": "belief-update-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/belief-update-coach/", "title": "Record What Would Change a Belief", "description": "Write a claim, the basis for your current view, the new information and the condition under which you would revise, narrow or suspend the belief.", "action": "Choose one claim that affects a decision. Write its current basis and the new information separately. Check whether the information addresses the same claim and context. Choose a disposition: unchanged, less certain, revised, narrowed or unresolved. Record what additional information would change the disposition.", "check_in": "What changed in the claim, its scope or my certainty, and what information would justify another update?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" }, { "id": "metacognition", "title": "Metacognition" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-22" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:best-odds-decision-making", "protocol_id": "brali:best-odds-decision-making", "slug": "best-odds-decision-making", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/best-odds-decision-making/", "title": "Focus on Best Odds", "description": "When making decisions with probabilities: - Stick to the best choice: Pick the option with the highest likelihood of success, even if it feels repetitive. - Avoid overthinking: Don’t try to \"balance\" probabilities—maximize them instead. - Track outcomes: Note what works best over time to reinforce smarter decisions. Example: Choosing between two investments? Opt for the one with higher consistent returns, even if less exciting.", "action": "When making decisions with probabilities: - Stick to the best choice: Pick the option with the highest likelihood of success, even if it feels repetitive. - Avoid overthinking: Don’t try to \"balance\" probabilities—maximize them instead. - Track outcomes: Note what works best over time to reinforce smarter decisions. Example: Choosing between two investments? Opt for the one with higher consistent returns, even if less exciting.", "check_in": "Check in when you follow probabilities rather than splitting decisions.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:bias-aware-meeting-insights", "protocol_id": "brali:bias-aware-meeting-insights", "slug": "bias-aware-meeting-insights", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/bias-aware-meeting-insights/", "title": "Uncover Hidden Insights", "description": "In group discussions: - Encourage: Ask each member to share unique perspectives or information. - Facilitate: Guide the conversation to ensure unshared insights are discussed. - Balance: Avoid spending too much time on what everyone already knows. Example: Start meetings by asking, \"What does everyone know that hasn’t been shared yet?\"", "action": "In group discussions: - Encourage: Ask each member to share unique perspectives or information. - Facilitate: Guide the conversation to ensure unshared insights are discussed. - Balance: Avoid spending too much time on what everyone already knows. Example: Start meetings by asking, \"What does everyone know that hasn’t been shared yet?\"", "check_in": "Check in when you prioritize new or unique insights during a discussion.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:bias-checkpoints-for-teams", "protocol_id": "brali:bias-checkpoints-for-teams", "slug": "bias-checkpoints-for-teams", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/bias-checkpoints-for-teams/", "title": "Spot and Challenge Hidden Biases", "description": "When interacting or making decisions: - Pause and reflect: \"Am I acting on assumptions based on someone’s background or appearance?\" - Seek diverse input: Surround yourself with perspectives different from your own. - Use structured decision-making: Avoid snap judgments by following a clear process. Example: Hiring? Focus on qualifications and skills, not personal characteristics.", "action": "When interacting or making decisions: - Pause and reflect: \"Am I acting on assumptions based on someone’s background or appearance?\" - Seek diverse input: Surround yourself with perspectives different from your own. - Use structured decision-making: Avoid snap judgments by following a clear process. Example: Hiring? Focus on qualifications and skills, not personal characteristics.", "check_in": "Check in when you notice and challenge an unconscious bias.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:break-big-goals-into-steps", "protocol_id": "brali:break-big-goals-into-steps", "slug": "break-big-goals-into-steps", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/break-big-goals-into-steps/", "title": "Turn a Large Goal into the Next Verifiable Step", "description": "Define the finish condition, expose dependencies, split the goal into observable deliverables, and choose the smallest next step that creates information or progress.", "action": "Write what done looks like, list the major deliverables and external dependencies, split uncertain work until each next step has an observable output, choose the smallest useful step, complete it, and update the map from what you learned.", "check_in": "What became complete or clearer, what dependency blocks the next step, and what is the smallest observable deliverable now?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "as-detective", "title": "As Detective" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" }, { "id": "planning-prioritization", "title": "Planning & Prioritization" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "detective", "title": "Detective" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "as-detective" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:break-familiarity-bias", "protocol_id": "brali:break-familiarity-bias", "slug": "break-familiarity-bias", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/break-familiarity-bias/", "title": "Check Whether Familiarity Is Driving a Low-Stakes Choice", "description": "For an ordinary low-stakes choice, name the familiar default, state the criterion that matters, compare one viable alternative, and keep or change the default for a concrete reason rather than novelty alone.", "action": "Name the default, write the criterion that matters, identify one viable alternative, compare the two on that criterion and any important constraint, then keep the default or try the alternative for a stated reason. Use this only for ordinary low-stakes choices.", "check_in": "What was the default, what criterion mattered, what alternative did I compare, and why did I keep or change the choice?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:bullet-point-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:bullet-point-coach", "slug": "bullet-point-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/bullet-point-coach/", "title": "Use a Short Bullet Outline Before You Speak", "description": "Before a meeting, update or presentation, write a compact set of cue points that preserves the purpose, the information the listener needs and the requested next step, then speak from the outline rather than reading a script.", "action": "Write the purpose of the conversation, the key facts or updates the listener needs, the decision or request if there is one, and any important risk or unknown. Put the cues in a useful order, remove duplicate points, then speak from them and adjust when the conversation changes.", "check_in": "Did the outline make the purpose, key information and next step easy to find, and which cue should be changed before the next use?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "talk-smart", "title": "Talk Smart" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "talk-smart" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:calibrate-task-estimates", "protocol_id": "brali:calibrate-task-estimates", "slug": "calibrate-task-estimates", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/calibrate-task-estimates/", "title": "Calibrate Task Estimates With Planned vs Actual Work", "description": "Define a concrete deliverable, make an initial estimate, record what completion actually required, note the main source of difference, and use that local record when planning similar work again.", "action": "Write the deliverable and important assumptions, make an estimate that includes the work you currently know about, complete or reassess the task, record the actual conditions and the main reason for any difference, then consult that record before estimating similar work again.", "check_in": "What did I estimate, what actually happened, what caused the largest difference, and what will I change in the next comparable estimate?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "planning-prioritization", "title": "Planning & Prioritization" }, { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:challenge-assumed-intent", "protocol_id": "brali:challenge-assumed-intent", "slug": "challenge-assumed-intent", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/challenge-assumed-intent/", "title": "Separate Observed Facts From Assumed Intent", "description": "When an ordinary ambiguous event feels intentional, separate the observable facts from your interpretation, list plausible alternatives, check relevant information, and use a neutral clarification before treating intent as established.", "action": "Write the observable event without motive language, mark the inferred intent as an interpretation, list other explanations that fit the known facts, check the information that is reasonably available, and ask a neutral clarifying question when another person can resolve the ambiguity.", "check_in": "What did I directly observe, what intent did I infer, what else could explain it, and what information would actually distinguish those explanations?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:challenge-generalizations-counterexamples", "protocol_id": "brali:challenge-generalizations-counterexamples", "slug": "challenge-generalizations-counterexamples", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/challenge-generalizations-counterexamples/", "title": "Counterexample Check", "description": "When a statement uses words such as always, never, everyone, or nothing, look for one genuine exception before treating it as a rule.", "action": "Write the absolute statement, underline the universal word, and find one genuine case where the statement does not hold. Then rewrite the claim more precisely.", "check_in": "Did the counterexample change the claim, or was the original statement already precise enough to survive the check?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "nlp", "title": "NLP" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" }, { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "nlp", "title": "NLP (legacy)" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "nlp" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:challenge-groupthink-in-meetings", "protocol_id": "brali:challenge-groupthink-in-meetings", "slug": "challenge-groupthink-in-meetings", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/challenge-groupthink-in-meetings/", "title": "Challenge the Consensus", "description": "In group discussions: - Ask questions: \"Have we considered other perspectives?\" - Encourage dissent: Create a safe space for alternative viewpoints. - Pause before deciding: Suggest taking time to explore overlooked options. Example: Before agreeing with a team’s rushed decision, propose reviewing potential risks and alternatives.", "action": "In group discussions: - Ask questions: \"Have we considered other perspectives?\" - Encourage dissent: Create a safe space for alternative viewpoints. - Pause before deciding: Suggest taking time to explore overlooked options. Example: Before agreeing with a team’s rushed decision, propose reviewing potential risks and alternatives.", "check_in": "Check in when you challenge groupthink and push for diverse perspectives.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:challenge-stereotypes-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:challenge-stereotypes-coach", "slug": "challenge-stereotypes-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/challenge-stereotypes-coach/", "title": "See the Individual, Not the Group", "description": "When thinking about other groups: - Pause assumptions: Ask yourself, \"Am I generalizing based on the group?\" - Get personal: Interact with individuals from the group to learn about their unique experiences. - Stay curious: Challenge stereotypes by seeking real, diverse examples. Example: If you think \"All people from X group act this way,\" question that thought and find real-world exceptions.", "action": "When thinking about other groups: - Pause assumptions: Ask yourself, \"Am I generalizing based on the group?\" - Get personal: Interact with individuals from the group to learn about their unique experiences. - Stay curious: Challenge stereotypes by seeking real, diverse examples. Example: If you think \"All people from X group act this way,\" question that thought and find real-world exceptions.", "check_in": "Check in when you recognize individuality over group stereotypes.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:check-base-rates-before-deciding", "protocol_id": "brali:check-base-rates-before-deciding", "slug": "check-base-rates-before-deciding", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/check-base-rates-before-deciding/", "title": "Check a Relevant Baseline Before Interpreting One Case", "description": "For an ordinary data-informed decision, define the relevant reference class, find a comparable baseline, inspect its scope and denominator, then combine that general context with the facts that are specific to the case.", "action": "State the decision, define the reference class, find a baseline with a clear denominator and scope, check whether it is comparable to the current case, add the case-specific information that genuinely differs, and keep the conclusion tentative when the baseline or fit is weak.", "check_in": "What reference class did I use, where did its baseline come from, how comparable is it to this case, and which case-specific fact could justify departing from it?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "data-literacy", "title": "Data Literacy" }, { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:check-blame-bias", "protocol_id": "brali:check-blame-bias", "slug": "check-blame-bias", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/check-blame-bias/", "title": "Check Blame Bias", "description": "When assigning blame: - Pause: Ask, \"Am I blaming more because the outcome was worse?\" - Separate outcome from intent: Focus on actions, not just consequences. - Avoid personal filters: Check if you’re influenced by similarities to the victim. Example: In a car accident case, avoid assigning more blame just because the damage was severe.", "action": "When assigning blame: - Pause: Ask, \"Am I blaming more because the outcome was worse?\" - Separate outcome from intent: Focus on actions, not just consequences. - Avoid personal filters: Check if you’re influenced by similarities to the victim. Example: In a car accident case, avoid assigning more blame just because the damage was severe.", "check_in": "Check in when you assess blame without being influenced by severity or personal connections.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:chef-taste-and-adjust", "protocol_id": "brali:chef-taste-and-adjust", "slug": "chef-taste-and-adjust", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/chef-taste-and-adjust/", "title": "Taste and Adjust One Variable at a Time", "description": "For food that is safe to taste, sample at useful stages, identify the specific imbalance you notice, make one small adjustment, and taste again before changing something else.", "action": "Choose a useful tasting point, make sure the food is safe and cool enough to sample, name the issue you notice such as blandness, excess salt, acidity, texture, or thickness, choose one small adjustment appropriate to the dish, mix or cook as needed, then taste again before making another change.", "check_in": "What did I notice before the adjustment, what single change did I make, and what is different after the next safe taste?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "chef", "title": "Chef" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "creativity-expression", "title": "Creativity & Expression" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "revision-feedback", "title": "Revision & Feedback" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "chef-operations", "title": "Chef / Operations" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "chef" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:choice-supportive-bias-check-in", "protocol_id": "brali:choice-supportive-bias-check-in", "slug": "choice-supportive-bias-check-in", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/choice-supportive-bias-check-in/", "title": "Spot Choice-Supportive Bias", "description": "After making a decision: - Be honest: Reflect on whether your choice truly delivered the results you hoped for. - Compare alternatives: Consider how other options might have played out. - Learn for next time: Focus on improving future decisions rather than justifying past ones. Example: If you bought a gadget and it didn’t meet expectations, admit it instead of defending the purchase.", "action": "After making a decision: - Be honest: Reflect on whether your choice truly delivered the results you hoped for. - Compare alternatives: Consider how other options might have played out. - Learn for next time: Focus on improving future decisions rather than justifying past ones. Example: If you bought a gadget and it didn’t meet expectations, admit it instead of defending the purchase.", "check_in": "Check in when you objectively evaluate a decision rather than justifying it.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:choose-best-resources", "protocol_id": "brali:choose-best-resources", "slug": "choose-best-resources", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/choose-best-resources/", "title": "Choose Resources for the Next Concrete Step", "description": "Start from the output or decision you need, choose the resource that best fits that next step, check authority, freshness, licensing and security where relevant, test the smallest useful use, then keep, defer or archive it.", "action": "Name the output or decision you need, compare candidate resources on direct relevance and usability, check authority, freshness, licensing, privacy and security where they matter, try the smallest useful interaction, and record whether to keep, defer or archive the resource.", "check_in": "What next step was this resource meant to support, did it fit that job, what constraint did I verify, and should I keep using it, defer it or archive it?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "chef", "title": "Chef" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" }, { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "information-management", "title": "Information Management" }, { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "chef-operations", "title": "Chef / Operations" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "chef" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:chunk-long-lists-memory-helper", "protocol_id": "brali:chunk-long-lists-memory-helper", "slug": "chunk-long-lists-memory-helper", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/chunk-long-lists-memory-helper/", "title": "Handle Long Lists: - Chunk It: Break the List into Smaller Groups of 3–5", "description": "To handle long lists: - Chunk it: Break the list into smaller groups of 3–5 items. - Prioritize: Focus on the most important items first. - Use categories: Group similar items together to make them easier to remember. Example: When shopping, group items like fruits, dairy, and snacks into separate categories.", "action": "To handle long lists: - Chunk it: Break the list into smaller groups of 3–5 items. - Prioritize: Focus on the most important items first. - Use categories: Group similar items together to make them easier to remember. Example: When shopping, group items like fruits, dairy, and snacks into separate categories.", "check_in": "Check in when you use grouping or chunking to manage long lists.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:clarify-probabilities-risk-breakdown", "protocol_id": "brali:clarify-probabilities-risk-breakdown", "slug": "clarify-probabilities-risk-breakdown", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/clarify-probabilities-risk-breakdown/", "title": "Clarify Probabilities", "description": "To improve judgment: - Break it down: Divide events into clear, mutually exclusive parts. - Add them up: Compare individual probabilities to the total likelihood. - Check your math: Avoid underestimating by verifying if the sum makes sense. Example: When assessing risks for a project, split them into categories (e.g., budget, time, resources) and evaluate each separately.", "action": "To improve judgment: - Break it down: Divide events into clear, mutually exclusive parts. - Add them up: Compare individual probabilities to the total likelihood. - Check your math: Avoid underestimating by verifying if the sum makes sense. Example: When assessing risks for a project, split them into categories (e.g., budget, time, resources) and evaluate each separately.", "check_in": "Check in when you clarify probabilities for better decision-making.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:clustering-illusion-guard", "protocol_id": "brali:clustering-illusion-guard", "slug": "clustering-illusion-guard", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/clustering-illusion-guard/", "title": "Check a Streak Before Treating It as a Pattern", "description": "When a short streak looks meaningful, record the complete observation window and denominator, compare the cluster with the broader history, check whether measurement or operating conditions changed, and avoid changing a plan solely because the sequence looks striking.", "action": "Record what happened, the full period or set you are looking at, and the denominator behind the visible cluster. Compare it with the earlier history when available, note any change in measurement or operating conditions, identify plausible alternative explanations, and choose whether to act, gather more information or keep the current plan.", "check_in": "What streak caught my attention, what is the full denominator and observation window, what changed in the context, and would I make the same decision if the sequence looked less visually striking?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, { "id": "data-literacy", "title": "Data Literacy" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:cognitive-bias-memory-capture", "protocol_id": "brali:cognitive-bias-memory-capture", "slug": "cognitive-bias-memory-capture", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/cognitive-bias-memory-capture/", "title": "Balance Leveling and Sharpening", "description": "To keep memories accurate: - Write details down: Capture events as soon as possible to avoid losing information. - Check for gaps: Ask yourself what might be missing in your memory. - Avoid exaggeration: Be mindful of which details you emphasize when retelling stories. Example: After a meeting, jot down key points immediately before memories get distorted.", "action": "To keep memories accurate: - Write details down: Capture events as soon as possible to avoid losing information. - Check for gaps: Ask yourself what might be missing in your memory. - Avoid exaggeration: Be mindful of which details you emphasize when retelling stories. Example: After a meeting, jot down key points immediately before memories get distorted.", "check_in": "Check in when you recall an event and actively balance details to avoid distortion.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:cognitive-biases-how-to-when-safety-increases-assess-risks-ask-am-i", "protocol_id": "brali:cognitive-biases-how-to-when-safety-increases-assess-risks-ask-am-i", "slug": "cognitive-biases-how-to-when-safety-increases-assess-risks-ask-am-i", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/cognitive-biases-how-to-when-safety-increases-assess-risks-ask-am-i/", "title": "Balance Safety and Risk", "description": "When safety increases: - Assess risks: Ask, \"Am I compensating for safety by taking unnecessary risks?\" - Set boundaries: Stick to cautious habits even in safer environments. - Focus on long-term impact: Remember that short-term safety doesn’t eliminate long-term consequences. Example: Driving a car with advanced safety features? Avoid speeding just because you feel more protected.", "action": "When safety increases: - Assess risks: Ask, \"Am I compensating for safety by taking unnecessary risks?\" - Set boundaries: Stick to cautious habits even in safer environments. - Focus on long-term impact: Remember that short-term safety doesn’t eliminate long-term consequences. Example: Driving a car with advanced safety features? Avoid speeding just because you feel more protected.", "check_in": "Check in when you avoid risky behaviors that counteract increased safety.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:cognitive-dissonance-resolution", "protocol_id": "brali:cognitive-dissonance-resolution", "slug": "cognitive-dissonance-resolution", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/cognitive-dissonance-resolution/", "title": "Stress-Test a Belief With Strong Counter-Information", "description": "Write the specific claim you currently accept, note the strongest support you have, seek credible information that could challenge it, compare relevance and independence, then keep, narrow or revise the claim without giving weak counterclaims equal weight.", "action": "Write the claim precisely, record what currently supports it, identify what kind of information would materially challenge it, seek the strongest relevant counter-information you can verify, compare source directness, relevance and independence, and record whether the claim stays, narrows or changes.", "check_in": "What is the exact claim, what currently supports it, what strong counter-information did I find, and did I keep, narrow or revise the claim for a stated reason?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "skill-sprint", "title": "Skill Sprint" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" }, { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "skill-sprint" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:common-source-radar", "protocol_id": "brali:common-source-radar", "slug": "common-source-radar", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/common-source-radar/", "title": "Trace Repeated Claims Back to Their Underlying Sources", "description": "When several pages or reports repeat the same claim, follow their links and citations back to the underlying material, record shared documents, datasets or organizations, and distinguish independent origins from repeated summaries.", "action": "Write the claim, list the pages or reports repeating it, follow their citations or links toward the origin, note shared documents, datasets, organizations or copied wording, and classify the set as independent origins, shared origin, mixed, or unclear.", "check_in": "Which items looked separate, what underlying origin did each one use, where did they overlap, and how many genuinely distinct origins remain?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, { "id": "environment-digital", "title": "Environment & Digital Life" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" }, { "id": "information-management", "title": "Information Management" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:communication-blocks-scheduler", "protocol_id": "brali:communication-blocks-scheduler", "slug": "communication-blocks-scheduler", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/communication-blocks-scheduler/", "title": "Batch Routine Messages Around Real Response Obligations", "description": "Set predictable windows for non-urgent messages, keep an explicit path for work that genuinely cannot wait, and adjust the schedule when it conflicts with actual response duties.", "action": "List the communication channels you monitor, separate channels that require rapid coverage from routine messages, place routine processing into predictable windows, define an exception path for genuinely time-sensitive items, turn longer requests into tasks, and review whether your response obligations are still being met.", "check_in": "Which messages waited until the planned window, which exception was genuinely time-sensitive, and did the schedule still meet the response expectations of my role?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "do-it", "title": "Do It" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "task-initiation", "title": "Task Initiation" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "do-it" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:confidence-calibration-habit", "protocol_id": "brali:confidence-calibration-habit", "slug": "confidence-calibration-habit", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/confidence-calibration-habit/", "title": "Record What Would Change Your Confidence Before You Commit", "description": "State your current confidence in plain language, record the main support and unknowns, name an observable fact that would change the judgment, then compare the expectation with what later happened and update future decisions accordingly.", "action": "State the decision or prediction, label your confidence in ordinary language, list the strongest support and the most important unknown, name one observable condition that would make you update, then revisit the record when the outcome or new information becomes available.", "check_in": "What did I expect, how confident was I, what would have changed my view, what actually happened, and what should I update next time?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "thinking", "title": "Thinking" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "metacognition", "title": "Metacognition" }, { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "thinking" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:confirmation-bias-challenge", "protocol_id": "brali:confirmation-bias-challenge", "slug": "confirmation-bias-challenge", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/confirmation-bias-challenge/", "title": "Run One Disconfirming Check Before a Consequential Commitment", "description": "Before an ordinary consequential commitment, state the assumption you currently favor, name one observable condition that would weaken it, check that condition directly, and update, narrow or escalate the decision when the result matters.", "action": "Write the assumption driving the decision, state one observation that would materially weaken it, identify where that information can be checked, inspect it before the commitment becomes difficult to reverse, and then keep, narrow, change or escalate the plan according to what you found.", "check_in": "What assumption was I favoring, what would have weakened it, did I check that condition, and how did the result change the commitment?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "thinking", "title": "Thinking" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" }, { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "thinking" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:conjunction-fallacy-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:conjunction-fallacy-coach", "slug": "conjunction-fallacy-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/conjunction-fallacy-coach/", "title": "Compare a Condition With the Same Condition Plus Another Requirement", "description": "When one option is A and another is A plus an additional condition B, write the two event sets explicitly and check their logical relationship before letting the more detailed description seem more likely.", "action": "Identify condition A, identify the additional condition B, write the compound event as A-and-B, and check whether every compound case is already included among the A cases. If so, do not rank the compound event above A merely because the added detail makes the story feel more specific.", "check_in": "What was A, what extra condition did B add, is every A-and-B case already an A case, and did the detailed wording change my initial ranking?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" }, { "id": "data-literacy", "title": "Data Literacy" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:consistency-bias-tracker", "protocol_id": "brali:consistency-bias-tracker", "slug": "consistency-bias-tracker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/consistency-bias-tracker/", "title": "When Reflecting on Your Past: - Write It Down: Keep a Journal of Key", "description": "When reflecting on your past: - Write it down: Keep a journal of key events and your thoughts at the time. - Ask others: Check your memories against those who were present. - Stay objective: Remind yourself that people change, and it’s okay if your past views differ from the present. Example: If you recall always loving your current career, check past entries or conversations to see if you had doubts.", "action": "When reflecting on your past: - Write it down: Keep a journal of key events and your thoughts at the time. - Ask others: Check your memories against those who were present. - Stay objective: Remind yourself that people change, and it’s okay if your past views differ from the present. Example: If you recall always loving your current career, check past entries or conversations to see if you had doubts.", "check_in": "Check in when you identify differences between past and present attitudes.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:context-cue-memory-recall", "protocol_id": "brali:context-cue-memory-recall", "slug": "context-cue-memory-recall", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/context-cue-memory-recall/", "title": "Use Context to Boost Recall", "description": "To retrieve memories: - Recreate the setting: Recall the sights, sounds, and smells of the original context. - Use prompts: Bring objects or tools from the original environment to trigger memory. - Mentally revisit: Imagine yourself back in the original situation. Example: To recall work-related ideas, sit at your desk or review materials from the office.", "action": "To retrieve memories: - Recreate the setting: Recall the sights, sounds, and smells of the original context. - Use prompts: Bring objects or tools from the original environment to trigger memory. - Mentally revisit: Imagine yourself back in the original situation. Example: To recall work-related ideas, sit at your desk or review materials from the office.", "check_in": "Check in when you use context cues to retrieve an otherwise forgotten memory.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:context-guard-for-decisions", "protocol_id": "brali:context-guard-for-decisions", "slug": "context-guard-for-decisions", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/context-guard-for-decisions/", "title": "Check the Operating Context Before Reusing a Decision", "description": "Before applying a familiar solution, state what changed, identify the people and system constraints that matter, separate verified facts from assumptions, and choose a reversible next step when important context is still missing.", "action": "State the decision, note what changed since the comparable case, list the concrete constraints and stakeholders that affect execution, mark assumptions separately from verified facts, and choose a reversible next step or clarification when a missing condition could change the choice.", "check_in": "What changed, which constraint matters now, what am I assuming rather than verifying, and what is the smallest next step that fits the current context?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:continued-influence-effect-misinformation", "protocol_id": "brali:continued-influence-effect-misinformation", "slug": "continued-influence-effect-misinformation", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/continued-influence-effect-misinformation/", "title": "Combat the Continued Influence Effect", "description": "When dealing with misinformation: - Fact-check: Verify the source of any information before accepting it. - Mentally replace: Once corrected, actively focus on the updated information. - Repeat the truth: Reinforce the correct version to overwrite the false one. Example: If a rumor about a coworker turns out false, remind yourself of the actual facts whenever you think about them.", "action": "When dealing with misinformation: - Fact-check: Verify the source of any information before accepting it. - Mentally replace: Once corrected, actively focus on the updated information. - Repeat the truth: Reinforce the correct version to overwrite the false one. Example: If a rumor about a coworker turns out false, remind yourself of the actual facts whenever you think about them.", "check_in": "Check in when you actively replace misinformation with the corrected version.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:control-to-action-compass", "protocol_id": "brali:control-to-action-compass", "slug": "control-to-action-compass", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/control-to-action-compass/", "title": "Separate Controllable Actions From Dependencies and Outcomes", "description": "For a concern or desired outcome, separate actions you can directly perform from dependencies you can influence or only observe, choose one concrete next action, and define how waiting items will be revisited instead of repeatedly planning the outcome itself.", "action": "Write the concern or desired outcome, list the actions you can directly perform, list dependencies or responses owned by others, identify outcomes you can only observe, choose one next action under your control, and give waiting items a review trigger rather than repeatedly treating them as current work.", "check_in": "What action can I perform directly, what depends on someone or something else, what outcome can I only observe, and when will I revisit the waiting part?", "life_area": { "slug": "mind-resilience", "title": "Mind & Resilience" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "stoicism", "title": "Stoicism" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "stoicism", "title": "Stoicism" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "mind-resilience", "growth_zone_slug": "stoicism" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:conversational-storytelling-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:conversational-storytelling-coach", "slug": "conversational-storytelling-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/conversational-storytelling-coach/", "title": "Use a Short Story to Explain One Point in Conversation", "description": "Choose one real example that directly supports the point you are making, keep only the context needed to understand what changed, connect the ending back to the current conversation, and remove confidential or identifying details that are not necessary.", "action": "State the point you need to explain, choose one real example that directly supports it, keep only the minimum context, describe the change or decision that matters, connect the ending back to the present topic, and remove confidential or identifying details that are not necessary for the explanation.", "check_in": "What point was the story serving, which detail made it clearer, what could be removed, and did I protect information that did not need to be shared?", "life_area": { "slug": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "talk-smart", "title": "Talk Smart" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "communication-relationships", "growth_zone_slug": "talk-smart" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:cut-your-losses-sunk-cost", "protocol_id": "brali:cut-your-losses-sunk-cost", "slug": "cut-your-losses-sunk-cost", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/cut-your-losses-sunk-cost/", "title": "Judge a Commitment by What Comes Next", "description": "When past time, money, or effort is dominating a continuation decision, separate what cannot be recovered and compare realistic future costs, benefits, constraints, and alternatives.", "action": "Name the decision. Separate unrecoverable past cost from future cost. List the realistic benefit of continuing, the best alternative use of the same resources, and any obligation or switching cost that genuinely exists now. Then choose stop, continue, change, or gather one missing fact.", "check_in": "If I were deciding from today forward, what future cost and benefit would justify continuing, and what alternative am I giving up?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "thinking", "title": "Thinking" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "critical-thinking", "title": "Critical Thinking" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "thinking" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:daily-priority-review-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:daily-priority-review-coach", "slug": "daily-priority-review-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/daily-priority-review-coach/", "title": "Review Open Tasks and Leave With a Clear Next Action", "description": "Scan open work, remove or park stale items, clarify the next action for active commitments, and choose what deserves attention now without turning the review itself into a large planning project.", "action": "Scan the open list, close or park items that are no longer active, rewrite vague active work as a concrete next action, identify blocked items and their dependency, choose the small set that deserves attention now, and stop the review before it turns into doing the tasks themselves.", "check_in": "What became clearer, what was removed or parked, which item is blocked, and what is the next action I can actually take?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "grow-fast", "title": "Grow fast" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "habits-consistency", "title": "Habits & Consistency" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "grow-fast" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:data-context-fit-checker", "protocol_id": "brali:data-context-fit-checker", "slug": "data-context-fit-checker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/data-context-fit-checker/", "title": "Question Data in New Contexts", "description": "When using numerical data: - Ask yourself: \"Does this data apply to this specific situation?\" - Double-check assumptions: Ensure the numbers make sense in the new context. - Explore alternatives: Seek additional information before drawing conclusions. Example: Using an old formula for a new project? Verify if it fits the current conditions first.", "action": "When using numerical data: - Ask yourself: \"Does this data apply to this specific situation?\" - Double-check assumptions: Ensure the numbers make sense in the new context. - Explore alternatives: Seek additional information before drawing conclusions. Example: Using an old formula for a new project? Verify if it fits the current conditions first.", "check_in": "Check in when you verify the relevance of data in a new context.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:decision-calibration-journal", "protocol_id": "brali:decision-calibration-journal", "slug": "decision-calibration-journal", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/decision-calibration-journal/", "title": "Decision Calibration Journal", "description": "Before an uncertain decision, record your expectation, confidence, and key assumption. Later compare them with the outcome and update how you make similar choices.", "action": "Before a meaningful uncertain choice, write the expected outcome, how confident you are in plain language, and the assumption that matters most. Revisit the note after the outcome is clear.", "check_in": "Which assumption held, which one failed, and what would you change in a similar decision next time?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "quantum", "title": "Quantum" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "decision-making", "title": "Decision Making" }, { "id": "metacognition", "title": "Metacognition" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "quantum" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-08-20" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:deepen-memory-levels-of-processing", "protocol_id": "brali:deepen-memory-levels-of-processing", "slug": "deepen-memory-levels-of-processing", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/deepen-memory-levels-of-processing/", "title": "Deepen Memory with Levels of Processing", "description": "To remember more effectively: - Think deeply: Relate new info to something personal or meaningful. - Visualize: Picture concepts or create mental stories about them. - Engage actively: Rephrase or discuss what you’re learning. Example: Instead of memorizing “photosynthesis,” think about how it powers the food you eat and describe it to a friend.", "action": "To remember more effectively: - Think deeply: Relate new info to something personal or meaningful. - Visualize: Picture concepts or create mental stories about them. - Engage actively: Rephrase or discuss what you’re learning. Example: Instead of memorizing “photosynthesis,” think about how it powers the food you eat and describe it to a friend.", "check_in": "Check in when you use deeper processing techniques to improve memory.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:default-choice-audit", "protocol_id": "brali:default-choice-audit", "slug": "default-choice-audit", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/default-choice-audit/", "title": "Audit a Default Before Letting It Decide for You", "description": "For a setting, subscription, workflow, or template with meaningful consequences, identify the current default, compare the relevant alternatives, and make a deliberate keep-or-change decision with an easy rollback when possible.", "action": "Pick one consequential default, identify what is currently selected, state what you need from the setting or service, compare only the realistic alternatives, note switching costs and important constraints, make a keep-or-change decision, and record how to reverse it when reversal matters.", "check_in": "What default did I inspect, what requirement mattered most, why did I keep or change it, and can I reverse the decision if the new choice is worse?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:estimate-vs-actual-calibrator", "protocol_id": "brali:estimate-vs-actual-calibrator", "slug": "estimate-vs-actual-calibrator", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/estimate-vs-actual-calibrator/", "title": "Adjust for Regressive Bias", "description": "When recalling or estimating: - Use actual data: Base your judgment on numbers or facts rather than instinct. - Check extremes: Ask if you’re underestimating highs or overestimating lows. - Keep track: Maintain a log to compare memories with reality over time. Example: Track your work hours to see if your memory matches the actual effort.", "action": "When recalling or estimating: - Use actual data: Base your judgment on numbers or facts rather than instinct. - Check extremes: Ask if you’re underestimating highs or overestimating lows. - Keep track: Maintain a log to compare memories with reality over time. Example: Track your work hours to see if your memory matches the actual effort.", "check_in": "Check in when you rely on data instead of assumptions to adjust your memories.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:euphoric-recall-reality-check", "protocol_id": "brali:euphoric-recall-reality-check", "slug": "euphoric-recall-reality-check", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/euphoric-recall-reality-check/", "title": "Spot Euphoric Recall", "description": "When reflecting on past events: - List the facts: Write down both positive and negative aspects of the memory. - Get perspective: Talk to others who shared the experience to balance your view. - Be realistic: Remind yourself that every memory has highs and lows. Example: If you recall an old job fondly, note the challenges you faced there to keep things balanced.", "action": "When reflecting on past events: - List the facts: Write down both positive and negative aspects of the memory. - Get perspective: Talk to others who shared the experience to balance your view. - Be realistic: Remind yourself that every memory has highs and lows. Example: If you recall an old job fondly, note the challenges you faced there to keep things balanced.", "check_in": "Check in when you identify a memory that feels overly positive and balance it with the full picture.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:evaluate-advice-not-authority", "protocol_id": "brali:evaluate-advice-not-authority", "slug": "evaluate-advice-not-authority", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/evaluate-advice-not-authority/", "title": "Question Authority", "description": "When considering an opinion or advice: - Ask yourself: \"Am I agreeing because of the person or because of the evidence?\" - Check the facts: Verify the information independently, regardless of who said it. - Value expertise over titles: Focus on the actual knowledge or experience behind the opinion. Example: A senior manager gives advice—analyze the content, not just their title.", "action": "When considering an opinion or advice: - Ask yourself: \"Am I agreeing because of the person or because of the evidence?\" - Check the facts: Verify the information independently, regardless of who said it. - Value expertise over titles: Focus on the actual knowledge or experience behind the opinion. Example: A senior manager gives advice—analyze the content, not just their title.", "check_in": "Check in when you evaluate advice based on evidence, not authority.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:evaluate-external-ideas-objectively", "protocol_id": "brali:evaluate-external-ideas-objectively", "slug": "evaluate-external-ideas-objectively", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/evaluate-external-ideas-objectively/", "title": "Embrace Outsider Ideas", "description": "When evaluating external ideas: - Ask: \"Is this idea or product effective, regardless of where it came from?\" - Compare: Assess its potential objectively against internal solutions. - Collaborate: Consider how external knowledge might complement your existing methods. Example: Your team resists using an external tool because it’s not developed in-house. Challenge this by focusing on its benefits and efficiency.", "action": "When evaluating external ideas: - Ask: \"Is this idea or product effective, regardless of where it came from?\" - Compare: Assess its potential objectively against internal solutions. - Collaborate: Consider how external knowledge might complement your existing methods. Example: Your team resists using an external tool because it’s not developed in-house. Challenge this by focusing on its benefits and efficiency.", "check_in": "Check in when you adopt or explore an external idea that adds value.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:fading-affect-bias-journal-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:fading-affect-bias-journal-coach", "slug": "fading-affect-bias-journal-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/fading-affect-bias-journal-coach/", "title": "Balance the Fading Affect Bias", "description": "To stay balanced: - Acknowledge both sides: Write about unpleasant memories alongside the positive ones. - Reflect intentionally: Spend time thinking about what you learned from difficult moments. - Focus on growth: Use past challenges as a reminder of your resilience. Example: When recalling a failed project, consider the lessons learned rather than just forgetting the negatives.", "action": "To stay balanced: - Acknowledge both sides: Write about unpleasant memories alongside the positive ones. - Reflect intentionally: Spend time thinking about what you learned from difficult moments. - Focus on growth: Use past challenges as a reminder of your resilience. Example: When recalling a failed project, consider the lessons learned rather than just forgetting the negatives.", "check_in": "Check in when you balance fading negative emotions with the lessons they taught you.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:fight-illusory-truth-effect", "protocol_id": "brali:fight-illusory-truth-effect", "slug": "fight-illusory-truth-effect", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/fight-illusory-truth-effect/", "title": "Stay Sharp: - Double-Check: Look up Facts You Think You", "description": "To stay sharp: - Double-check: Look up facts you think you \"just know.\" - Ask questions: Challenge statements that feel familiar but unverified. - Don’t repeat unverified info: Sharing it reinforces the bias. Example: Before you repeat a fun “fact” you read online, spend 5 minutes confirming it.", "action": "To stay sharp: - Double-check: Look up facts you think you \"just know.\" - Ask questions: Challenge statements that feel familiar but unverified. - Don’t repeat unverified info: Sharing it reinforces the bias. Example: Before you repeat a fun “fact” you read online, spend 5 minutes confirming it.", "check_in": "Check in when you challenge a statement that feels true just because it’s familiar.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:finish-strong-peak-end-rule", "protocol_id": "brali:finish-strong-peak-end-rule", "slug": "finish-strong-peak-end-rule", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/finish-strong-peak-end-rule/", "title": "End on a High Note", "description": "To create great memories: - Finish strong: End tasks or experiences with something positive. - Celebrate small wins: After completing a tough task, reward yourself with something enjoyable. - Pause to reflect: Take a moment to focus on the highlights before ending your day. Example: After a meeting, share a positive takeaway with your team to leave a good impression.", "action": "To create great memories: - Finish strong: End tasks or experiences with something positive. - Celebrate small wins: After completing a tough task, reward yourself with something enjoyable. - Pause to reflect: Take a moment to focus on the highlights before ending your day. Example: After a meeting, share a positive takeaway with your team to leave a good impression.", "check_in": "Check in when you focus on the best parts and how you wrap up experiences.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:fix-time-distortions-with-anchors", "protocol_id": "brali:fix-time-distortions-with-anchors", "slug": "fix-time-distortions-with-anchors", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/fix-time-distortions-with-anchors/", "title": "Anchor Your Timeline", "description": "To fix time distortions: - Use anchors: Connect events to specific dates or milestones. - Journal regularly: Write down events as they happen to track their timing. - Review your calendar: Check past schedules to confirm when things actually happened. Example: If you’re unsure when you last met a client, refer to your notes or calendar to avoid assuming it was more recent or distant.", "action": "To fix time distortions: - Use anchors: Connect events to specific dates or milestones. - Journal regularly: Write down events as they happen to track their timing. - Review your calendar: Check past schedules to confirm when things actually happened. Example: If you’re unsure when you last met a client, refer to your notes or calendar to avoid assuming it was more recent or distant.", "check_in": "Check in when you use tools to correct your perception of time.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:full-list-recall-technique", "protocol_id": "brali:full-list-recall-technique", "slug": "full-list-recall-technique", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/full-list-recall-technique/", "title": "Boost Recall with Full Lists", "description": "To remember all items: - Avoid splitting lists: Keep the whole list in view when reviewing. - Use categories: Organize items into groups to make them easier to recall. - Quiz yourself: After reviewing, cover the list and test yourself on all the items. Example: When memorizing a grocery list, don’t focus only on part of it—review the entire list.", "action": "To remember all items: - Avoid splitting lists: Keep the whole list in view when reviewing. - Use categories: Organize items into groups to make them easier to recall. - Quiz yourself: After reviewing, cover the list and test yourself on all the items. Example: When memorizing a grocery list, don’t focus only on part of it—review the entire list.", "check_in": "Check in when you use a full-list approach to improve recall.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:future-self-planning-check", "protocol_id": "brali:future-self-planning-check", "slug": "future-self-planning-check", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/future-self-planning-check/", "title": "Think Beyond Your Current Self", "description": "When making future plans: - Pause: Ask, \"Will future me feel the same way?\" - Imagine different scenarios: Consider how changes in mood, priorities, or environment might affect your choices. - Build flexibility: Leave room to adapt as your preferences evolve. Example: Booking a gym membership? Think about whether your motivation will match your current enthusiasm in a month.", "action": "When making future plans: - Pause: Ask, \"Will future me feel the same way?\" - Imagine different scenarios: Consider how changes in mood, priorities, or environment might affect your choices. - Build flexibility: Leave room to adapt as your preferences evolve. Example: Booking a gym membership? Think about whether your motivation will match your current enthusiasm in a month.", "check_in": "Check in when you adjust a plan to account for changing future preferences.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:generation-effect-memory-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:generation-effect-memory-coach", "slug": "generation-effect-memory-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/generation-effect-memory-coach/", "title": "Remember Better: - Create Your Own Notes: Instead of Copying, Rephrase in Your Own", "description": "To remember better: - Create your own notes: Instead of copying, rephrase in your own words. - Teach someone else: Explaining ideas reinforces your understanding. - Summarize: Generate key points from what you learn and write them down. Example: After a meeting, jot down what you’ve learned in your own words to solidify your memory.", "action": "To remember better: - Create your own notes: Instead of copying, rephrase in your own words. - Teach someone else: Explaining ideas reinforces your understanding. - Summarize: Generate key points from what you learn and write them down. Example: After a meeting, jot down what you’ve learned in your own words to solidify your memory.", "check_in": "Check in when you generate your own version of a concept to enhance recall.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:goal-journaling-insights", "protocol_id": "brali:goal-journaling-insights", "slug": "goal-journaling-insights", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/goal-journaling-insights/", "title": "Goal Journal Review", "description": "Use a short goal journal to capture what you planned, what actually happened, what got in the way, and one adjustment for the next attempt.", "action": "After a meaningful work session or at a regular review point, write four short lines: what I intended, what happened, what helped or blocked me, and what I will change next.", "check_in": "Did the journal produce one concrete adjustment, or did it become another place to write without changing anything?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "future-builder", "title": "Future Builder" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "future-builder" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:highlight-recall-assistant", "protocol_id": "brali:highlight-recall-assistant", "slug": "highlight-recall-assistant", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/highlight-recall-assistant/", "title": "Make Key Info Stand Out", "description": "To remember better: - Highlight differently: Use bold colors or symbols for key points. - Add uniqueness: Attach a quirky story or image to important details. - Group by importance: Separate standout items from general information. Example: If studying a list, underline or use bright markers on the most critical items.", "action": "To remember better: - Highlight differently: Use bold colors or symbols for key points. - Add uniqueness: Attach a quirky story or image to important details. - Group by importance: Separate standout items from general information. Example: If studying a list, underline or use bright markers on the most critical items.", "check_in": "Check in when you make key information stand out in your notes.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:hindsight-bias-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:hindsight-bias-coach", "slug": "hindsight-bias-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/hindsight-bias-coach/", "title": "Challenge Hindsight Bias", "description": "When reviewing past events: - List surprises: Note things that were unexpected at the time. - Avoid ‘should haves’: Focus on decisions made with the information you had then. - Compare predictions: Look back at what you expected versus what happened. Example: After a project, review what you thought would happen and compare it to the outcome.", "action": "When reviewing past events: - List surprises: Note things that were unexpected at the time. - Avoid ‘should haves’: Focus on decisions made with the information you had then. - Compare predictions: Look back at what you expected versus what happened. Example: After a project, review what you thought would happen and compare it to the outcome.", "check_in": "Check in when you identify a moment where hindsight altered your perspective.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:honest-feedback-phrasing-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:honest-feedback-phrasing-coach", "slug": "honest-feedback-phrasing-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/honest-feedback-phrasing-coach/", "title": "When Asked for Your Opinion: - Be Truthful: Share Your Real Thoughts Respectfully", "description": "When asked for your opinion: - Be truthful: Share your real thoughts respectfully. - Use tact: Frame criticism constructively (\"I think this could be improved by…", "action": "When asked for your opinion: - Be truthful: Share your real thoughts respectfully. - Use tact: Frame criticism constructively (\"I think this could be improved by…", "check_in": "Check in when you give honest feedback without fear of offending.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:honest-outcome-reflection-bias", "protocol_id": "brali:honest-outcome-reflection-bias", "slug": "honest-outcome-reflection-bias", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/honest-outcome-reflection-bias/", "title": "Own Successes AND Failures", "description": "When reflecting on outcomes: - Be honest: Ask, \"What role did I really play in this success or failure?\" - Balance: Acknowledge both personal effort and external factors. - Learn from mistakes: Use failures as opportunities to grow, not excuses to deflect. Example: If a project goes well, credit teamwork and planning, not just your input.", "action": "When reflecting on outcomes: - Be honest: Ask, \"What role did I really play in this success or failure?\" - Balance: Acknowledge both personal effort and external factors. - Learn from mistakes: Use failures as opportunities to grow, not excuses to deflect. Example: If a project goes well, credit teamwork and planning, not just your input.", "check_in": "Check in when you give a balanced account of your role in success or failure.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:humor-memory-mnemonics", "protocol_id": "brali:humor-memory-mnemonics", "slug": "humor-memory-mnemonics", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/humor-memory-mnemonics/", "title": "Leverage the Humor Effect", "description": "To remember better: - Add humor: When studying or taking notes, include a funny phrase, drawing, or analogy. - Lighten the mood: Associate dry facts with jokes or funny stories. - Laugh it off: Share what you’ve learned in a humorous way with others. Example: To remember “photosynthesis,” picture a plant wearing sunglasses and sipping a smoothie!", "action": "To remember better: - Add humor: When studying or taking notes, include a funny phrase, drawing, or analogy. - Lighten the mood: Associate dry facts with jokes or funny stories. - Laugh it off: Share what you’ve learned in a humorous way with others. Example: To remember “photosynthesis,” picture a plant wearing sunglasses and sipping a smoothie!", "check_in": "Check in when you use humor to make something memorable.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:intent-vs-accident-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:intent-vs-accident-coach", "slug": "intent-vs-accident-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/intent-vs-accident-coach/", "title": "Distinguish Intent from Accident", "description": "When evaluating actions: - Ask: \"Could this have been an accident or unintentional?\" - Look for patterns: One mistake doesn’t indicate intent—watch for repeated behavior. - Check your biases: Avoid assuming intent without solid evidence. Example: If a coworker forgets to share notes, consider if it was an oversight rather than deliberate exclusion.", "action": "When evaluating actions: - Ask: \"Could this have been an accident or unintentional?\" - Look for patterns: One mistake doesn’t indicate intent—watch for repeated behavior. - Check your biases: Avoid assuming intent without solid evidence. Example: If a coworker forgets to share notes, consider if it was an oversight rather than deliberate exclusion.", "check_in": "Check in when you distinguish between intentional and accidental actions.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:intrinsic-vs-extrinsic-motivation-check", "protocol_id": "brali:intrinsic-vs-extrinsic-motivation-check", "slug": "intrinsic-vs-extrinsic-motivation-check", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/intrinsic-vs-extrinsic-motivation-check/", "title": "Understand Motivations", "description": "When evaluating motivation: - For others: Ask, \"Could their actions come from genuine interest, not just external rewards?\" - For yourself: Reflect, \"Are my actions really driven by passion, or am I influenced by external factors?\" - Compare honestly: Treat others’ motivations as complex as your own. Example: A teammate working late might care about the project, not just a bonus.", "action": "When evaluating motivation: - For others: Ask, \"Could their actions come from genuine interest, not just external rewards?\" - For yourself: Reflect, \"Are my actions really driven by passion, or am I influenced by external factors?\" - Compare honestly: Treat others’ motivations as complex as your own. Example: A teammate working late might care about the project, not just a bonus.", "check_in": "Check in when you give fair weight to both intrinsic and extrinsic motivations.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:judge-decisions-by-process", "protocol_id": "brali:judge-decisions-by-process", "slug": "judge-decisions-by-process", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/judge-decisions-by-process/", "title": "Review a Decision Using What Was Known at the Time", "description": "Reconstruct what information was actually available when a decision was made, compare it with the options and constraints considered then, and turn the review into one process improvement for a similar future decision.", "action": "Write the decision and its date, list the information and constraints that were available then, separate later discoveries into a different section, note which realistic alternatives were considered or missed, identify one process weakness or strength, and define one change to use for a similar future decision.", "check_in": "What was genuinely knowable at the decision point, what did I learn only afterward, and what should change in the process next time?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:judge-groups-fairly", "protocol_id": "brali:judge-groups-fairly", "slug": "judge-groups-fairly", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/judge-groups-fairly/", "title": "See the Individual in the Group", "description": "When judging groups: - Challenge assumptions: Ask, \"Does this apply to all members, or just one person?\" - Seek evidence: Look for facts about the group, not just individual actions. - Avoid overgeneralizing: Treat group decisions as collective, not necessarily representative of everyone. Example: If one team member misses a deadline, don’t assume the entire team is unreliable.", "action": "When judging groups: - Challenge assumptions: Ask, \"Does this apply to all members, or just one person?\" - Seek evidence: Look for facts about the group, not just individual actions. - Avoid overgeneralizing: Treat group decisions as collective, not necessarily representative of everyone. Example: If one team member misses a deadline, don’t assume the entire team is unreliable.", "check_in": "Check in when you evaluate groups without letting one person’s actions define the whole.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:judge-individuals-not-groups", "protocol_id": "brali:judge-individuals-not-groups", "slug": "judge-individuals-not-groups", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/judge-individuals-not-groups/", "title": "Judge Individuals, Not Groups", "description": "When evaluating groups: - Ask yourself: \"Am I judging the group based on one person’s actions?\" - Separate individuals: Focus on specific behaviors or contributions, not stereotypes. - Avoid sweeping judgments: Base evaluations on evidence, not generalizations. Example: If one team member underperforms, don’t assume the whole team is inefficient.", "action": "When evaluating groups: - Ask yourself: \"Am I judging the group based on one person’s actions?\" - Separate individuals: Focus on specific behaviors or contributions, not stereotypes. - Avoid sweeping judgments: Base evaluations on evidence, not generalizations. Example: If one team member underperforms, don’t assume the whole team is inefficient.", "check_in": "Check in when you focus on individuals instead of generalizing about groups.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:judge-intent-not-outcomes", "protocol_id": "brali:judge-intent-not-outcomes", "slug": "judge-intent-not-outcomes", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/judge-intent-not-outcomes/", "title": "Judge Actions, Not Outcomes", "description": "When assessing morality: - Focus on intent: Ask, \"What was their intention, regardless of the outcome?\" - Separate luck from action: Consider how chance influenced the result. - Be fair: Avoid overpraising or blaming based on outcomes alone. Example: If someone saves a life by chance, their intent to help matters as much as the lucky outcome.", "action": "When assessing morality: - Focus on intent: Ask, \"What was their intention, regardless of the outcome?\" - Separate luck from action: Consider how chance influenced the result. - Be fair: Avoid overpraising or blaming based on outcomes alone. Example: If someone saves a life by chance, their intent to help matters as much as the lucky outcome.", "check_in": "Check in when you evaluate actions based on intent rather than results.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:kpi-drift-guardrail", "protocol_id": "brali:kpi-drift-guardrail", "slug": "kpi-drift-guardrail", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/kpi-drift-guardrail/", "title": "Focus on the Bigger Picture", "description": "When working with metrics: - Ask yourself: \"Is this measure representing the actual goal, or has it become the goal?\" - Revisit the strategy: Ensure you understand the broader objective the metric supports. - Avoid tunnel vision: Regularly check if actions are aligned with the ultimate goal. Example: Focusing solely on sales numbers? Balance them with customer satisfaction to maintain long-term success.", "action": "When working with metrics: - Ask yourself: \"Is this measure representing the actual goal, or has it become the goal?\" - Revisit the strategy: Ensure you understand the broader objective the metric supports. - Avoid tunnel vision: Regularly check if actions are aligned with the ultimate goal. Example: Focusing solely on sales numbers? Balance them with customer satisfaction to maintain long-term success.", "check_in": "Check in when you align metrics with strategic goals.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:meeting-message-recall", "protocol_id": "brali:meeting-message-recall", "slug": "meeting-message-recall", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/meeting-message-recall/", "title": "Retain the Message: - Summarize: Write or Say the Main Idea in Your Own", "description": "To retain the message: - Summarize: Write or say the main idea in your own words. - Look for patterns: Identify recurring themes or key points. - Practice context recall: Remember when and why something was said, not just how. Example: After a meeting, jot down the core decisions and action points instead of trying to recall word-for-word what was said.", "action": "To retain the message: - Summarize: Write or say the main idea in your own words. - Look for patterns: Identify recurring themes or key points. - Practice context recall: Remember when and why something was said, not just how. Example: After a meeting, jot down the core decisions and action points instead of trying to recall word-for-word what was said.", "check_in": "Check in when you remember the essence of a conversation or reading.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:memory-fact-checker", "protocol_id": "brali:memory-fact-checker", "slug": "memory-fact-checker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/memory-fact-checker/", "title": "Reality Check Your Memories", "description": "To avoid false memories: - Validate facts: Check with others involved or revisit records (emails, photos, notes). - Stay neutral: Avoid over-analyzing or trying too hard to recall—this can create distortions. - Ask questions: Reflect on whether your memory feels vivid or constructed. Example: Before insisting that an event happened a certain way, verify it with a trusted source.", "action": "To avoid false memories: - Validate facts: Check with others involved or revisit records (emails, photos, notes). - Stay neutral: Avoid over-analyzing or trying too hard to recall—this can create distortions. - Ask questions: Reflect on whether your memory feels vivid or constructed. Example: Before insisting that an event happened a certain way, verify it with a trusted source.", "check_in": "Check in when you fact-check a memory to confirm its accuracy.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:modality-effect-memory-booster", "protocol_id": "brali:modality-effect-memory-booster", "slug": "modality-effect-memory-booster", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/modality-effect-memory-booster/", "title": "Remember Better: - Listen and Repeat: Say Key Points Aloud After Hearing Them", "description": "To remember better: - Listen and repeat: Say key points aloud after hearing them. - Mix modalities: Write down spoken info or speak aloud written notes. - Review audio: Record important notes and listen back later. Example: After a meeting, record a summary of key points and listen to it during your commute.", "action": "To remember better: - Listen and repeat: Say key points aloud after hearing them. - Mix modalities: Write down spoken info or speak aloud written notes. - Review audio: Record important notes and listen back later. Example: After a meeting, record a summary of key points and listen to it during your commute.", "check_in": "Check in when you use a mix of listening and writing to strengthen recall.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:mood-memory-matcher", "protocol_id": "brali:mood-memory-matcher", "slug": "mood-memory-matcher", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/mood-memory-matcher/", "title": "Use Mood Context Carefully When Practicing Recall", "description": "To align mood and memory: - Match your mood: Study happy topics when you’re in a good mood; tackle tough topics when feeling serious. - Recreate the setting: When recalling something, try to recreate the emotional environment you were in when you learned it. - Stay balanced: Use calming techniques (like deep breathing) to avoid overly negative or positive distortions. Example: If you felt relaxed while learning a skill, try to replicate that mood during a test or performance.", "action": "To align mood and memory: - Match your mood: Study happy topics when you’re in a good mood; tackle tough topics when feeling serious. - Recreate the setting: When recalling something, try to recreate the emotional environment you were in when you learned it. - Stay balanced: Use calming techniques (like deep breathing) to avoid overly negative or positive distortions. Example: If you felt relaxed while learning a skill, try to replicate that mood during a test or performance.", "check_in": "Check in when you match your mood to the task to improve memory.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:moral-judgment-bias-checker", "protocol_id": "brali:moral-judgment-bias-checker", "slug": "moral-judgment-bias-checker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/moral-judgment-bias-checker/", "title": "Look Beyond Morals", "description": "When assessing outcomes: - Pause: Ask yourself, \"Could societal factors have contributed here?\" - Contextualize: Consider external influences like environment, resources, or circumstances. - Avoid blame: Shift from moral judgment to understanding. Example: If someone misses a deadline, think about workload or system issues rather than assuming laziness.", "action": "When assessing outcomes: - Pause: Ask yourself, \"Could societal factors have contributed here?\" - Contextualize: Consider external influences like environment, resources, or circumstances. - Avoid blame: Shift from moral judgment to understanding. Example: If someone misses a deadline, think about workload or system issues rather than assuming laziness.", "check_in": "Check in when you assess situations without jumping to moral judgments.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:negativity-bias-positive-reflection", "protocol_id": "brali:negativity-bias-positive-reflection", "slug": "negativity-bias-positive-reflection", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/negativity-bias-positive-reflection/", "title": "Balance the Negativity Bias", "description": "To manage negative recall: - List positives: After a bad experience, write down at least 3 positive things that happened that day. - Reframe events: Find the silver lining in unpleasant memories. - Focus on solutions: Instead of dwelling on what went wrong, brainstorm ways to improve next time. Example: If a meeting didn’t go well, note what you learned and how you can prepare better next time.", "action": "To manage negative recall: - List positives: After a bad experience, write down at least 3 positive things that happened that day. - Reframe events: Find the silver lining in unpleasant memories. - Focus on solutions: Instead of dwelling on what went wrong, brainstorm ways to improve next time. Example: If a meeting didn’t go well, note what you learned and how you can prepare better next time.", "check_in": "Check in when you counteract negativity by focusing on the positive.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:pause-before-assuming-hostility", "protocol_id": "brali:pause-before-assuming-hostility", "slug": "pause-before-assuming-hostility", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/pause-before-assuming-hostility/", "title": "Pause Before Assuming Hostility", "description": "When interpreting behavior: - Pause: Ask yourself, \"Could this be unintentional or neutral?\" - Clarify: If unsure, communicate and seek their perspective. - Reflect: Check if past experiences are influencing your assumptions. Example: If someone doesn’t reply to an email, consider they might be busy, not ignoring you.", "action": "When interpreting behavior: - Pause: Ask yourself, \"Could this be unintentional or neutral?\" - Clarify: If unsure, communicate and seek their perspective. - Reflect: Check if past experiences are influencing your assumptions. Example: If someone doesn’t reply to an email, consider they might be busy, not ignoring you.", "check_in": "Check in when you interpret behavior without immediately assuming hostility.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:phase-transition-ritual-tracker", "protocol_id": "brali:phase-transition-ritual-tracker", "slug": "phase-transition-ritual-tracker", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/phase-transition-ritual-tracker/", "title": "Create a Clear Handoff Between Two Activities", "description": "Use a short, ordinary handoff at a recurring boundary—such as work to personal time—to record what is unfinished, reset the environment, and make the first action of the next activity explicit.", "action": "Choose one recurring transition, write down any unfinished item that must be resumed later, perform one simple closing action in the environment, name the first action of the next activity, then leave the handoff alone unless it proves useful enough to repeat.", "check_in": "What did I close, what did I preserve for later, what is the first action in the next mode, and did this handoff reduce avoidable switching friction?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "triz", "title": "TRIZ" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" }, { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" }, { "id": "attention-focus", "title": "Attention & Focus" } ], "methods": [ { "id": "triz", "title": "TRIZ" } ], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "triz" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:plan-tasks-by-peak-energy", "protocol_id": "brali:plan-tasks-by-peak-energy", "slug": "plan-tasks-by-peak-energy", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/plan-tasks-by-peak-energy/", "title": "Match Demanding Work to Your Own High-Energy Windows", "description": "Track when demanding work feels easier or harder for several normal days, protect a promising window for one important task, and keep the change only if your own results justify it.", "action": "For several ordinary workdays, note your perceived energy and the kind of work you were doing at a few points in the day, look for a repeatable high-energy window, place one demanding task there, protect the block from avoidable interruptions, and compare the result with your usual schedule.", "check_in": "When did demanding work feel easiest today, what task did I place there, and did the scheduling change produce a result worth repeating?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "do-it", "title": "Do It" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "task-initiation", "title": "Task Initiation" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "do-it" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:present-bias-check", "protocol_id": "brali:present-bias-check", "slug": "present-bias-check", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/present-bias-check/", "title": "Avoid Overestimating the Present: - Zoom Out: Ask, “will This Matter in a Year", "description": "To avoid overestimating the present: - Zoom out: Ask, “Will this matter in a year? Five years?” - Review the past: Compare this moment to similar past events for perspective. - Plan ahead: Focus on long-term goals, not just immediate importance. Example: Instead of stressing over a minor setback, think about how it fits into your bigger picture.", "action": "To avoid overestimating the present: - Zoom out: Ask, “Will this matter in a year? Five years?” - Review the past: Compare this moment to similar past events for perspective. - Plan ahead: Focus on long-term goals, not just immediate importance. Example: Instead of stressing over a minor setback, think about how it fits into your bigger picture.", "check_in": "Check in when you step back and see the broader context.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:prevention-vs-response-calculator", "protocol_id": "brali:prevention-vs-response-calculator", "slug": "prevention-vs-response-calculator", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/prevention-vs-response-calculator/", "title": "Weigh Prevention vs. Response", "description": "When faced with a risk: - Compare effectiveness: Ask, \"Is prevention or response better suited for this situation?\" - Estimate cost: Look at resources needed for prevention versus timely action later. - Focus on balance: Avoid overinvesting in one while ignoring the other. Example: Buying insurance? Balance between preventative coverage and resources for handling unexpected events.", "action": "When faced with a risk: - Compare effectiveness: Ask, \"Is prevention or response better suited for this situation?\" - Estimate cost: Look at resources needed for prevention versus timely action later. - Focus on balance: Avoid overinvesting in one while ignoring the other. Example: Buying insurance? Balance between preventative coverage and resources for handling unexpected events.", "check_in": "Check in when you balance prevention and response strategies effectively.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:proportionality-bias-big-events", "protocol_id": "brali:proportionality-bias-big-events", "slug": "proportionality-bias-big-events", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/proportionality-bias-big-events/", "title": "Question Big Causes for Big Events", "description": "When faced with a big event: - Ask yourself: \"Is there solid evidence for a big cause, or am I assuming it because the event is large?\" - Break it down: Look at smaller, logical factors that might explain the event. - Challenge conspiracy thinking: Focus on verified sources and avoid overgeneralizing. Example: A major market crash? Analyze economic trends rather than assuming a single catastrophic cause.", "action": "When faced with a big event: - Ask yourself: \"Is there solid evidence for a big cause, or am I assuming it because the event is large?\" - Break it down: Look at smaller, logical factors that might explain the event. - Challenge conspiracy thinking: Focus on verified sources and avoid overgeneralizing. Example: A major market crash? Analyze economic trends rather than assuming a single catastrophic cause.", "check_in": "Check in when you avoid jumping to big causes for big events.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:pygmalion-expectations-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:pygmalion-expectations-coach", "slug": "pygmalion-expectations-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/pygmalion-expectations-coach/", "title": "Set Positive Expectations", "description": "To harness the Pygmalion Effect: - Encourage: Set realistic but optimistic expectations for others. - Support: Provide feedback and resources to help them succeed. - Monitor: Ensure your expectations align with their actual strengths and goals. Example: If mentoring someone, focus on their potential and emphasize progress over perfection.", "action": "To harness the Pygmalion Effect: - Encourage: Set realistic but optimistic expectations for others. - Support: Provide feedback and resources to help them succeed. - Monitor: Ensure your expectations align with their actual strengths and goals. Example: If mentoring someone, focus on their potential and emphasize progress over perfection.", "check_in": "Check in when you set positive expectations and see improvements in performance.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:qa-checklist-templates-runbook", "protocol_id": "brali:qa-checklist-templates-runbook", "slug": "qa-checklist-templates-runbook", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/qa-checklist-templates-runbook/", "title": "Build a QA Checklist from Real Failure Modes", "description": "Turn a recurring QA task into a short checklist with clear expected results, exception handling, an owner, and a revision step when reality exposes a missing check.", "action": "Choose one recurring QA activity, list the failure modes that would matter, turn each necessary check into an action plus expected result, define what to capture when the result differs, run the checklist on real work, and revise it when a new recurring miss appears.", "check_in": "Which check changed the release or review decision, which item was ambiguous, and what should be added, removed, or rewritten before the next run?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "as-qa", "title": "As QA" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "work-money", "title": "Work & Money" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "error-prevention", "title": "Error Prevention" }, { "id": "work-systems", "title": "Work Systems" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "qa", "title": "Quality Assurance" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "as-qa" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:qa-clear-feedback-templates", "protocol_id": "brali:qa-clear-feedback-templates", "slug": "qa-clear-feedback-templates", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/qa-clear-feedback-templates/", "title": "Write an Actionable QA Report Another Person Can Use", "description": "Turn a vague defect report into a compact handoff that distinguishes what was observed from what is suspected and gives the receiver enough context to reproduce, investigate, and verify the fix.", "action": "Write a one-line observed problem and context, add the smallest reliable reproduction sequence, attach the relevant evidence while removing secrets and personal data, label any suspected cause as a hypothesis, state the expected behavior, and define a narrow acceptance check for the fix.", "check_in": "Can another person see what happened, reproduce or investigate it, distinguish fact from hypothesis, and know what would count as fixed?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "as-qa", "title": "As QA" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" }, { "id": "communication-relationships", "title": "Communication & Relationships" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "error-prevention", "title": "Error Prevention" }, { "id": "clear-communication", "title": "Clear Communication" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [ { "id": "qa", "title": "Quality Assurance" } ], "classification_status": "explicit", "classification_source": "reviewed-ontology-override", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "as-qa" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:question-default-portions", "protocol_id": "brali:question-default-portions", "slug": "question-default-portions", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/question-default-portions/", "title": "Rethink Default Quantities", "description": "When consuming (e.g., food, resources): - Ask yourself: \"Do I really need this much, or am I just following the default?\" - Adjust portions: Take only what’s appropriate for your needs, not the suggested amount. - Set your own limits: Avoid letting external standards dictate your consumption. Example: Served a large plate of food? Eat until you’re satisfied, not until the plate is empty.", "action": "When consuming (e.g., food, resources): - Ask yourself: \"Do I really need this much, or am I just following the default?\" - Adjust portions: Take only what’s appropriate for your needs, not the suggested amount. - Set your own limits: Avoid letting external standards dictate your consumption. Example: Served a large plate of food? Eat until you’re satisfied, not until the plate is empty.", "check_in": "Check in when you adjust consumption based on your actual needs.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:question-fairness-bias", "protocol_id": "brali:question-fairness-bias", "slug": "question-fairness-bias", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/question-fairness-bias/", "title": "Question the Fairness Narrative", "description": "When analyzing injustice: - Ask: \"Is this outcome truly deserved, or am I rationalizing it?\" - Empathize: Consider factors outside the victim’s control. - Acknowledge reality: The world isn’t always fair—avoid blaming victims. Example: If someone loses their job unexpectedly, avoid assuming they must have done something wrong.", "action": "When analyzing injustice: - Ask: \"Is this outcome truly deserved, or am I rationalizing it?\" - Empathize: Consider factors outside the victim’s control. - Acknowledge reality: The world isn’t always fair—avoid blaming victims. Example: If someone loses their job unexpectedly, avoid assuming they must have done something wrong.", "check_in": "Check in when you question assumptions about fairness in outcomes.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:question-purpose-in-random-events", "protocol_id": "brali:question-purpose-in-random-events", "slug": "question-purpose-in-random-events", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/question-purpose-in-random-events/", "title": "Question Purposeful Explanations", "description": "When noticing a purpose in random events: - Ask yourself: \"Is there any actual evidence of intention or design here?\" - Consider randomness: Some things happen by chance without any goal behind them. - Separate cause from purpose: Look for causal explanations rather than assuming intent. Example: A storm ruined plans? Don’t assume it “happened for a reason”—explore natural causes instead.", "action": "When noticing a purpose in random events: - Ask yourself: \"Is there any actual evidence of intention or design here?\" - Consider randomness: Some things happen by chance without any goal behind them. - Separate cause from purpose: Look for causal explanations rather than assuming intent. Example: A storm ruined plans? Don’t assume it “happened for a reason”—explore natural causes instead.", "check_in": "Check in when you challenge the assumption of purpose in random events.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:recall-early-childhood-memories-triggers", "protocol_id": "brali:recall-early-childhood-memories-triggers", "slug": "recall-early-childhood-memories-triggers", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/recall-early-childhood-memories-triggers/", "title": "Explore Childhood Amnesia", "description": "To recall early memories: - Use triggers: Look at photos or listen to music from your early years. - Ask family: Talk to relatives about events you may have forgotten. - Write it down: Jot down fragments of memories as they surface. Example: A photo of a birthday party might help you recall more about the event.", "action": "To recall early memories: - Use triggers: Look at photos or listen to music from your early years. - Ask family: Talk to relatives about events you may have forgotten. - Write it down: Jot down fragments of memories as they surface. Example: A photo of a birthday party might help you recall more about the event.", "check_in": "Check in when you recall an early memory with the help of a trigger or conversation.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:reduce-egocentric-bias-with-evidence", "protocol_id": "brali:reduce-egocentric-bias-with-evidence", "slug": "reduce-egocentric-bias-with-evidence", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/reduce-egocentric-bias-with-evidence/", "title": "Reduce Egocentric Bias", "description": "When recalling events: - Use evidence: Look at photos, reports, or other objective records of what happened. - Ask others: Gather perspectives from those who were there. - Reflect honestly: Recognize moments where your memory might exaggerate your role or success. Example: If you remember organizing a successful event, check with others to confirm your recollection.", "action": "When recalling events: - Use evidence: Look at photos, reports, or other objective records of what happened. - Ask others: Gather perspectives from those who were there. - Reflect honestly: Recognize moments where your memory might exaggerate your role or success. Example: If you remember organizing a successful event, check with others to confirm your recollection.", "check_in": "Check in when you adjust your memory to reflect reality, not ego.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:reduce-reactance-offer-choices", "protocol_id": "brali:reduce-reactance-offer-choices", "slug": "reduce-reactance-offer-choices", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/reduce-reactance-offer-choices/", "title": "Handle Resistance Calmly", "description": "When facing reactance: - Reframe requests: Offer choices instead of commands to reduce resistance. - Empathize: Understand the other person’s need for autonomy and validate their feelings. - Negotiate: Collaborate on solutions that respect their freedom. Example: Instead of saying, \"You must do this now,\" say, \"Would you prefer to tackle this now or after lunch?\"", "action": "When facing reactance: - Reframe requests: Offer choices instead of commands to reduce resistance. - Empathize: Understand the other person’s need for autonomy and validate their feelings. - Negotiate: Collaborate on solutions that respect their freedom. Example: Instead of saying, \"You must do this now,\" say, \"Would you prefer to tackle this now or after lunch?\"", "check_in": "Check in when you successfully reframe a request and reduce resistance.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:reduce-stereotype-bias-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:reduce-stereotype-bias-coach", "slug": "reduce-stereotype-bias-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/reduce-stereotype-bias-coach/", "title": "Break Free from Stereotypes", "description": "To reduce stereotypical bias: - Pause and question: Before making assumptions, ask yourself, “What evidence do I have?” - Focus on individuals: Get to know people beyond labels and categories. - Seek diverse perspectives: Actively listen to stories and views different from your own. Example: Instead of assuming someone’s skills based on their background, ask them about their experiences directly.", "action": "To reduce stereotypical bias: - Pause and question: Before making assumptions, ask yourself, “What evidence do I have?” - Focus on individuals: Get to know people beyond labels and categories. - Seek diverse perspectives: Actively listen to stories and views different from your own. Example: Instead of assuming someone’s skills based on their background, ask them about their experiences directly.", "check_in": "Check in when you challenge and replace stereotypical assumptions.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:remember-names-and-faces", "protocol_id": "brali:remember-names-and-faces", "slug": "remember-names-and-faces", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/remember-names-and-faces/", "title": "Overcome Cross-Race Effect", "description": "When meeting new people: - Focus on details: Pay attention to unique features, like hairstyle, clothing, or mannerisms. - Make connections: Associate the person with an activity or place to reinforce recognition. - Practice mindfulness: Avoid rushing interactions—give yourself time to observe. Example: If you meet someone at a conference, link their face to a topic they discussed.", "action": "When meeting new people: - Focus on details: Pay attention to unique features, like hairstyle, clothing, or mannerisms. - Make connections: Associate the person with an activity or place to reinforce recognition. - Practice mindfulness: Avoid rushing interactions—give yourself time to observe. Example: If you meet someone at a conference, link their face to a topic they discussed.", "check_in": "Check in when you recognize someone accurately despite initial difficulties.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:rotate-focus-list-recall", "protocol_id": "brali:rotate-focus-list-recall", "slug": "rotate-focus-list-recall", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/rotate-focus-list-recall/", "title": "Overcome Memory Inhibition", "description": "To retrieve all items: - Rotate focus: Review all parts of a list instead of sticking to the first items. - Use triggers: Write down clues to jog your memory for the forgotten parts. - Repeat evenly: Go over the list multiple times without overemphasizing certain items. Example: When revising notes, review sections evenly instead of just re-reading the first few pages.", "action": "To retrieve all items: - Rotate focus: Review all parts of a list instead of sticking to the first items. - Use triggers: Write down clues to jog your memory for the forgotten parts. - Repeat evenly: Go over the list multiple times without overemphasizing certain items. Example: When revising notes, review sections evenly instead of just re-reading the first few pages.", "check_in": "Check in when you recover forgotten parts of a list by balancing your focus.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:searchless-memory-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:searchless-memory-coach", "slug": "searchless-memory-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/searchless-memory-coach/", "title": "Combat the Google Effect", "description": "To reduce dependency on search engines: - Write things down: Jot key facts in a notebook or app. - Memorize essentials: Focus on learning critical knowledge by heart. - Quiz yourself: Test what you know without looking it up. Example: Instead of Googling a frequent recipe, memorize it and practice making it.", "action": "To reduce dependency on search engines: - Write things down: Jot key facts in a notebook or app. - Memorize essentials: Focus on learning critical knowledge by heart. - Quiz yourself: Test what you know without looking it up. Example: Instead of Googling a frequent recipe, memorize it and practice making it.", "check_in": "Check in when you recall something without needing to look it up online.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:separate-to-decide-decision-evaluator", "protocol_id": "brali:separate-to-decide-decision-evaluator", "slug": "separate-to-decide-decision-evaluator", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/separate-to-decide-decision-evaluator/", "title": "Evaluate Options Against Fixed Criteria Before Comparing Them", "description": "Define the must-have criteria first, inspect each option against the same criteria, record unknowns separately, and compare survivors only after the individual evaluations are complete.", "action": "Write the must-have constraints and relevant preferences before opening the comparison, evaluate each option against that same list, mark missing information as unknown rather than pass or fail, remove options that clearly violate a must-have, and compare the remaining trade-offs only after the individual evaluations are recorded.", "check_in": "Did I keep the same criteria across options, which unknown could still change the result, and which remaining trade-off actually matters?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:slow-time-under-pressure", "protocol_id": "brali:slow-time-under-pressure", "slug": "slow-time-under-pressure", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/slow-time-under-pressure/", "title": "Master Your Perception of Time", "description": "To manage time perception: - Practice calmness: Breathe deeply to slow things down when you feel rushed. - Focus intently: In critical moments, focus on one detail at a time to create clarity. - Review after action: Reflect on what happened to separate emotions from actual timing. Example: During a stressful meeting, focus on your breath and slow your response to regain control.", "action": "To manage time perception: - Practice calmness: Breathe deeply to slow things down when you feel rushed. - Focus intently: In critical moments, focus on one detail at a time to create clarity. - Review after action: Reflect on what happened to separate emotions from actual timing. Example: During a stressful meeting, focus on your breath and slow your response to regain control.", "check_in": "Check in when you regulate your sense of time under pressure.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:spot-illusory-correlations", "protocol_id": "brali:spot-illusory-correlations", "slug": "spot-illusory-correlations", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/spot-illusory-correlations/", "title": "Spot Illusory Correlations", "description": "To avoid false connections: - Look for patterns: Ask yourself, “Is this really connected, or just a coincidence?” - Seek evidence: Check if there’s actual data supporting the relationship. - Stay objective: Write down facts separately and then compare. Example: If you think eating bananas always improves your mood, track it for a week to see if the pattern holds.", "action": "To avoid false connections: - Look for patterns: Ask yourself, “Is this really connected, or just a coincidence?” - Seek evidence: Check if there’s actual data supporting the relationship. - Stay objective: Write down facts separately and then compare. Example: If you think eating bananas always improves your mood, track it for a week to see if the pattern holds.", "check_in": "Check in when you catch yourself assuming a connection without evidence.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:spot-the-halo-effect", "protocol_id": "brali:spot-the-halo-effect", "slug": "spot-the-halo-effect", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/spot-the-halo-effect/", "title": "Separate Traits from Perception", "description": "When forming an impression: - Ask yourself: \"Am I judging based on one good trait or the full picture?\" - Challenge assumptions: Notice if a positive quality is influencing unrelated judgments. - Seek diverse feedback: Gather opinions from others to balance your perception. Example: A charismatic colleague may not always be the best leader—focus on skills, not charm.", "action": "When forming an impression: - Ask yourself: \"Am I judging based on one good trait or the full picture?\" - Challenge assumptions: Notice if a positive quality is influencing unrelated judgments. - Seek diverse feedback: Gather opinions from others to balance your perception. Example: A charismatic colleague may not always be the best leader—focus on skills, not charm.", "check_in": "Check in when you evaluate someone based on multiple traits, not just one standout quality.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:spot-unintentional-plagiarism", "protocol_id": "brali:spot-unintentional-plagiarism", "slug": "spot-unintentional-plagiarism", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/spot-unintentional-plagiarism/", "title": "When You Think You’ve Had a Novel Idea: - Pause and Reflect: Ask, “have", "description": "When you think you’ve had a novel idea: - Pause and reflect: Ask, “Have I encountered this idea before?” - Check sources: Revisit books, articles, or conversations you’ve recently engaged with. - Document origins: Note down where your ideas come from to avoid confusion later. Example: If you’re writing a report, double-check to ensure your “new” concept isn’t paraphrased from another source.", "action": "When you think you’ve had a novel idea: - Pause and reflect: Ask, “Have I encountered this idea before?” - Check sources: Revisit books, articles, or conversations you’ve recently engaged with. - Document origins: Note down where your ideas come from to avoid confusion later. Example: If you’re writing a report, double-check to ensure your “new” concept isn’t paraphrased from another source.", "check_in": "Check in when you verify the originality of your thoughts.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:suggestibility-defense-trainer", "protocol_id": "brali:suggestibility-defense-trainer", "slug": "suggestibility-defense-trainer", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/suggestibility-defense-trainer/", "title": "Question Leading Suggestions", "description": "To resist suggestibility: - Slow down: Reflect before accepting others’ suggestions as true. - Seek evidence: Verify claims rather than relying on someone’s framing. - Ask critical questions: “Is this my thought, or has it been influenced?” Example: If someone suggests a memory (“Remember when we all agreed?”), ask for details to confirm.", "action": "To resist suggestibility: - Slow down: Reflect before accepting others’ suggestions as true. - Seek evidence: Verify claims rather than relying on someone’s framing. - Ask critical questions: “Is this my thought, or has it been influenced?” Example: If someone suggests a memory (“Remember when we all agreed?”), ask for details to confirm.", "check_in": "Check in when you pause to question a suggestion instead of accepting it immediately.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:sunk-cost-decision-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:sunk-cost-decision-coach", "slug": "sunk-cost-decision-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/sunk-cost-decision-coach/", "title": "Review a High-Commitment Continue-or-Stop Decision", "description": "For a commitment with multiple stakeholders, dependencies, or meaningful switching costs, compare future paths explicitly and document which current facts justify the next step.", "action": "Define the feasible options. For each option record future cost, expected benefit, dependency or obligation, switching cost, reversibility, and important uncertainty. Ask what you would choose if the unrecoverable past investment were already accepted as history, then reconcile that answer with real current constraints.", "check_in": "Which current facts justify continuing or stopping, which past costs are irrelevant to the next choice, and what uncertainty still matters?", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:three-good-things-highlights", "protocol_id": "brali:three-good-things-highlights", "slug": "three-good-things-highlights", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/three-good-things-highlights/", "title": "Stay Positive: - Recall Wins: Write Down 3 Good Things That Happened Each Day", "description": "To stay positive: - Recall wins: Write down 3 good things that happened each day. - Reframe negatives: Think about what you learned from a tough situation. - Celebrate progress: Look back on how far you’ve come. Example: At the end of the week, write a short note about your best moments to revisit later.", "action": "To stay positive: - Recall wins: Write down 3 good things that happened each day. - Reframe negatives: Think about what you learned from a tough situation. - Celebrate progress: Look back on how far you’ve come. Example: At the end of the week, write a short note about your best moments to revisit later.", "check_in": "Check in when you focus on positive moments and lessons from the past.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:tip-of-the-tongue-fix", "protocol_id": "brali:tip-of-the-tongue-fix", "slug": "tip-of-the-tongue-fix", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/tip-of-the-tongue-fix/", "title": "Clear the ‘Tip of the Tongue’ Block", "description": "To unblock stuck memories: - Relax: Take deep breaths and stop stressing over the word or idea. - Use hints: Think of related words, phrases, or contexts. - Distract yourself: Do something else for a while; it often pops up later. Example: If you can’t recall a name, focus on where you met the person or other details about them.", "action": "To unblock stuck memories: - Relax: Take deep breaths and stop stressing over the word or idea. - Use hints: Think of related words, phrases, or contexts. - Distract yourself: Do something else for a while; it often pops up later. Example: If you can’t recall a name, focus on where you met the person or other details about them.", "check_in": "Check in when you resolve a memory block using hints or relaxation.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:top-3-daily-focus-planner", "protocol_id": "brali:top-3-daily-focus-planner", "slug": "top-3-daily-focus-planner", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/top-3-daily-focus-planner/", "title": "Choose Up to Three Priority Outcomes for the Day", "description": "Choose a small set of outcomes that deserves protected attention today, define what done means, and move the rest to a visible backlog instead of pretending every task is equally urgent.", "action": "Review today's deadlines, dependencies, and available capacity; choose up to three outcomes that most deserve progress; define what done means for each; reserve appropriate time where possible; place other tasks in a visible backlog; and re-plan explicitly when genuinely urgent work changes the day.", "check_in": "Which priority outcomes moved today, what changed the plan, and what should be carried forward rather than silently added to tomorrow?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "future-builder", "title": "Future Builder" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "future-builder" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:verify-claims-ask-for-sources", "protocol_id": "brali:verify-claims-ask-for-sources", "slug": "verify-claims-ask-for-sources", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/verify-claims-ask-for-sources/", "title": "Test the Truth", "description": "When someone shares information: - Ask for clarity: \"Where did you hear this?\" or \"What’s the source?\" - Cross-check: Verify their claims with other evidence. - Stay neutral: Don’t assume truth or falsehood—investigate first. Example: A colleague makes a bold claim in a meeting. Instead of accepting it outright, request data or examples.", "action": "When someone shares information: - Ask for clarity: \"Where did you hear this?\" or \"What’s the source?\" - Cross-check: Verify their claims with other evidence. - Stay neutral: Don’t assume truth or falsehood—investigate first. Example: A colleague makes a bold claim in a meeting. Instead of accepting it outright, request data or examples.", "check_in": "Check in when you verify information instead of assuming its truth.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:verify-facts-protect-memory", "protocol_id": "brali:verify-facts-protect-memory", "slug": "verify-facts-protect-memory", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/verify-facts-protect-memory/", "title": "Guard Against Misinformation", "description": "To protect memory: - Verify info: Check facts before trusting new details about an event. - Write it down: Record key facts right after an event to lock them in. - Question changes: Be skeptical of info that seems to alter your original memory. Example: If you hear a new version of a story, cross-check it with your original notes or memory.", "action": "To protect memory: - Verify info: Check facts before trusting new details about an event. - Write it down: Record key facts right after an event to lock them in. - Question changes: Be skeptical of info that seems to alter your original memory. Example: If you hear a new version of a story, cross-check it with your original notes or memory.", "check_in": "Check in when you verify facts to prevent misinformation from altering your memory.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:visual-mnemonics-memory-booster", "protocol_id": "brali:visual-mnemonics-memory-booster", "slug": "visual-mnemonics-memory-booster", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/visual-mnemonics-memory-booster/", "title": "Improve Memory: - Use Visuals: Add Images to Your Notes or Presentations", "description": "To improve memory: - Use visuals: Add images to your notes or presentations. - Sketch ideas: Draw simple visuals to represent complex concepts. - Pair pictures and words: Combine images with short descriptions for the best results. Example: When learning vocabulary, draw a quick picture next to each word to make it easier to recall.", "action": "To improve memory: - Use visuals: Add images to your notes or presentations. - Sketch ideas: Draw simple visuals to represent complex concepts. - Pair pictures and words: Combine images with short descriptions for the best results. Example: When learning vocabulary, draw a quick picture next to each word to make it easier to recall.", "check_in": "Check in when you use pictures to strengthen your memory of information.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:weekly-goal-review-coach", "protocol_id": "brali:weekly-goal-review-coach", "slug": "weekly-goal-review-coach", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/weekly-goal-review-coach/", "title": "Run a Weekly Review That Produces One Clear Change", "description": "Use a recurring weekly checkpoint to inspect active goals, completed and missed work, constraints, and changing priorities, then turn the review into a small set of concrete scheduling or scope decisions.", "action": "Review the active goals and commitments, note what moved and what did not, identify the main constraint or changed assumption, decide what should continue, stop, shrink, delegate, or move, and schedule the first concrete action created by the review.", "check_in": "What moved this week, what blocked or changed, what am I changing for the next week, and where is the first action scheduled?", "life_area": { "slug": "focus-execution", "title": "Focus & Execution" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "future-builder", "title": "Future Builder" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "focus-action", "title": "Focus & Action" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "goals", "title": "Goals" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "focus-execution", "growth_zone_slug": "future-builder" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": "2026-09-10" }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:weird-visual-mnemonics", "protocol_id": "brali:weird-visual-mnemonics", "slug": "weird-visual-mnemonics", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/weird-visual-mnemonics/", "title": "Remember Something: - Make It Weird: Add Something Bizarre or Unusual to the Idea", "description": "To remember something: - Make it weird: Add something bizarre or unusual to the idea or fact. - Visualize it vividly: Picture the bizarre element as vividly as possible. - Tell a story: Embed the information in a strange, memorable scenario. Example: To remember someone’s name (e.g., Daisy), imagine them wearing a giant daisy hat.", "action": "To remember something: - Make it weird: Add something bizarre or unusual to the idea or fact. - Visualize it vividly: Picture the bizarre element as vividly as possible. - Tell a story: Embed the information in a strange, memorable scenario. Example: To remember someone’s name (e.g., Daisy), imagine them wearing a giant daisy hat.", "check_in": "Check in when you use bizarre imagery to enhance your memory of something.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null }, { "canonical_id": "brali:protocol:zeigarnik-unfinished-task-focus", "protocol_id": "brali:zeigarnik-unfinished-task-focus", "slug": "zeigarnik-unfinished-task-focus", "url": "https://brali-lifeos.github.io/life-os/zeigarnik-unfinished-task-focus/", "title": "Harness Focus: - Start Small: Begin a Task, Even If You Can’t Finish It", "description": "To harness focus: - Start small: Begin a task, even if you can’t finish it right away. - Use checkpoints: Pause at natural stopping points to keep motivation. - Let it linger: Use the tension of an unfinished task to stay motivated. Example: Write the first sentence of an email or presentation to make it easier to continue later.", "action": "To harness focus: - Start small: Begin a task, even if you can’t finish it right away. - Use checkpoints: Pause at natural stopping points to keep motivation. - Let it linger: Use the tension of an unfinished task to stay motivated. Example: Write the first sentence of an email or presentation to make it easier to continue later.", "check_in": "Check in when you leave a task unfinished to build momentum.", "life_area": { "slug": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" }, "growth_zone": { "slug": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" }, "ontology": { "domains": [ { "id": "learning-thinking", "title": "Learning & Thinking" } ], "topics": [ { "id": "cognitive-biases", "title": "Cognitive Biases" } ], "methods": [], "lenses": [], "classification_status": "topic-mapped", "classification_source": "legacy-zone-map", "legacy": { "life_area_slug": "learning-thinking", "growth_zone_slug": "cognitive-biases" } }, "evidence": { "status": "practical", "source_recorded": false, "source_url": null, "reviewed_at": null }, "sensitive": false, "eligible": true, "quality_score": 50, "quality_checks": { "trusted_state": true, "required_identity": true, "required_content": true, "valid_life_area": true, "sensitive_boundary": true, "topic_mapped": true, "has_check_in": true, "source_linked": false, "action_quality": true, "description_quality": true }, "strengths": [ "trusted-practical", "topic-mapped", "has-check-in", "clear-action", "clear-description" ], "ineligible_reasons": [], "selected": false, "selection_rank": null, "selection_score": null, "selection_reason": null } ] }