The reviewed source can support a conservative practical protocol.
Brali decision: Protocol candidate. This page summarizes a reviewed evidence boundary; it does not reproduce the source and it does not turn one paper into a universal prescription.
What the source supports
When unfinished work must be interrupted, a short resumption plan can reduce attention residue and protect performance in the studied interruption contexts.
What it does not establish
It eliminates all switching costs.
There is a validated exact three-line template.
It has a known universal productivity percentage.
Important limitations
The evidence comes from a small set of controlled interruption studies and does not represent every form of complex, collaborative or high-stakes real-world work.
A ready-to-resume plan can mitigate attention residue in the studied contexts; it does not make task switching cost-free or imply that avoidable interruptions should be accepted.
The research supports making a concrete resumption plan, not Brali's exact three-prompt note format, note length, writing medium or timing rule.
The studies do not establish a universal productivity percentage, a guaranteed performance benefit, or the same effect for every individual and task.
This evidence decision is attached to the maintained Brali entry above. The public protocol may be narrowed, reviewed, or kept practical according to the decision.
Editorial note: Highest-value genuinely new productivity protocol from this pass. Proposed action: before a forced or deliberate switch from unfinished work, capture where you stopped, the next concrete action, and one critical restart detail.
Use the boundary, not just the headline
When an AI agent or a person retrieves this decision, preserve both the supported claim and the unsupported or overstated claims. Dropping the boundary would turn a reviewed source into a stronger claim than Brali actually maintains.